...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Shawneetown

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When the unexpected occurs and you fall victim to a dog bite injury in Shawneetown, it’s pivotal to have specialists on your side who understand Illinois law thoroughly. It’s here that Carlson Bier takes precedence over others. Our firm specializes in personal injury cases, particularly those pertaining to Dog Bite Injuries — an area we’ve mastered through extensive study and hands-on experience. We proudly deliver adept representation that encompasses all intricate aspects of this legal field; ensuring maximum protection for your rights as our client is our highest priority. Accidents involving dogs can be highly traumatic, often leading to serious physical injuries and emotional distress. Carlson Bier will help navigate these complex issues with compassion coupled with fierce legal savviness – getting you the compensation you rightfully deserve without delay or compromise. It isn’t by chance that citizens across Shawneetown turn their trust towards us when fate deals them a harsh blow of this nature – we’ve earned this confidence through committed service marked by competency at its best.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Shawneetown Illinois

Carlson Bier is esteemed as a premier personal injury law firm in Illinois that specializes in dog bite cases, backed by years of rich experience and diligent commitment. As advocates for justice, we understand the physical, emotional, and financial trauma such an incident can trigger. Our dedicated team of personal injury lawyers engages with compassion while efficiently working toward securing just compensation.

When it comes to dog bites the consequent injuries sustained vary drastically depending on several factors; these include the breed involved, the severity of the bite and whether immediate medical intervention was implemented. Innocuous though they may seem, deep puncture wounds often result from such attacks proving at times quite serious near joints or major blood vessels. This could lead to prolonged impairment further inhibiting daily activities and causing significant distress.

• Eighty percent of dog bites do not require medical treatment beyond minor first aid but severe occurrences can lead to injuries that necessitate surgical repair.

• Dog attacks are susceptible to infections given bacteria inhabit a canine’s mouth thereby introducing pathogens into wound tissue.

• Emotional repercussions are also prevalent extending from minor instances of fright escalating into severe conditions like Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

• Over half the victims bitten are children who present greater vulnerability towards sustaining considerable harm due to their size and inability to fend off a canine.

At Carlson Bier, we emphasize preventive education to aid potential victims avoid such situations entirely; hence we advocate aggressive-dog labeling laws which support awareness regarding potentially threatening animals in neighborhoods. Equally important is safeguarding pet owner responsibility whereby we encourage legislation stipulating more robust rules enforcing liable pet ownership.

In response to increased litigation regarding dog bites across Illinois recently enacted Civil Liability Act stipulates owners be held fully accountable for any harm inflicted by their pets irrespective if impending danger was perceived or not previously.

While coming with its own set of challenges pursuing legal recourse can significantly alleviate the burdensome costs associated with treating an incident induced by a dog bite especially relating to:

• Medical bills: Depending upon severity these can include hospital stays, surgeries, follow-up appointments, and medication.

• Psychological counseling: Post-traumatic stress or fear towards dogs might necessitate professional intervention.

• Lost wages: Inability to work while recovering.

The value in obtaining informed legal counsel cannot be overstated. Carlson Bier’s personal injury lawyers excel at carefully investigating and artfully presenting your case ensuring you secure the utmost compensation permissible under Illinois law.

We empathize with the turmoil such incidents cause and are here to facilitate regaining control of your life by demystifying the legal process. We guarantee our commitment extends beyond mere representation striving instead for advocacy as we guide you through this challenging time. Our extensive experience coupled with attentive personalized approach guarantees every client feels valued while their case progresses smoothly toward a successful closure.

In addition, Carlson Bier operates on contingency basis meaning attorney fees are collected only after a successful settlement has been achieved further fostering trust in us pursuing justice for you relentlessly without further augmenting financial duress experienced already.

Extend your confidence to our distinguished team at Carlson Bier where each case is treated with respect, urgency, integrity leaving no stone unturned till justice is served. For a comprehensive understanding of what your case implies legally and financially we encourage engaging with our ‘Compensation Calculator.’ Simply click on the button below further empowering yourself through awareness and taking that crucial step towards an organized recovery path encompassed by sound reassurance ensured by solid representation provided by Carlson Bier.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Shawneetown Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Shawneetown

Areas of Practice in Shawneetown

Bike Incidents

Focused on legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Fire Damages

Extending skilled legal services for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Medical Negligence

Providing experienced legal support for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Fault

Managing cases involving faulty products, providing specialist legal assistance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Aged Malpractice

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Trip Incidents

Expert in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking justice for their harm.

Birth Harms

Extending legal aid for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Crashes

Accidents: Committed to assisting patients of car accidents secure just compensation for injuries and damages.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Specializing in providing representation for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Truck Mishap

Ensuring adept legal support for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for damages.

Building Site Crashes

Dedicated to defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cognitive Traumas

Committed to ensuring dedicated legal assistance for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Wounds

Expertise in tackling cases for victims who have suffered damages from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Specializing in legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Loss

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and expert legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spine Damage

Specializing in supporting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​