FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Shelbyville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Pedestrian accidents can result in severe injuries or even loss of life, leaving the affected parties with emotional trauma and potential financial hardships. When these distressing incidents occur in Shelbyville, it’s crucial you have a trusted advocate by your side to fight for your rights. That’s where Carlson Bier steps into action as the dependable Pedestrian Accident Attorney group that is always ready to represent your interests relentlessly. This personal injury law firm brings knowledge and experience onto the table, keen on securing suitable compensation for physical suffering, lost income, medical expenses and other related damages incurred due to pedestrian accidents. With Carlson Bier at your helm, expert legal advice is assured every step of the way –from insurance clinics negotiation to courtroom representation if needed – ensuring clients’ needs are met optimally while adhering strictly to Illinois law protocols. Entrust yourself with our seasoned attorneys who harbor an established reputation borne out of winning settlements against overwhelming odds – trust only Carlson Bier Solicitors for handling your pedestrian accident claims effectively.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Shelbyville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that the aftermath of a pedestrian accident can be exceedingly daunting and confusing. Based in Illinois, our experienced personal injury attorneys are dedicated to support you every step of the way as we navigate your case towards an equitable resolution.

Pedestrian accidents represent a specific and challenging area of personal injury law, as these incidents often result in severe injuries due to the vulnerable position of the pedestrian at the time of impact. With an estimated tens of thousands of incidents reported annually nationwide, Illinois has seen its share of catastrophic pedestrian accidents.

Several factors contribute immensely to this kind of unfortunate incident: distracted driving by mobile usage or intoxication; failure to give right-of-way at crosswalks; speeding or reckless driving; and poor visibility conditions amongst others. Understanding such causes could aid immensely not only with litigation but also emphasize adequate precautions and preventive strategies pedestrians could adhere to.

The legal nuances essentially depend on pinpointing responsibility accurately based upon comprehensive understanding

of traffic laws applicable in Illinois. Proving driver negligence forms an essential part for just compensation claims post pedestrian accidents.

Our team at Carlson Bier applies collective expertise honed over years offering excellent counsel for such cases outlined around three key pillars:

1) Thorough Investigation: Our seasoned lawyers assiduously examine all aspects surrounding your case beginning from police reports, witness statements to reviewing video footage if available.

2) Expertise in Law: Basis their extensive knowledge, our attorneys will identify infractions against pertinent laws allowing us to fault correctly thereby strengthening your claim.

3) Negotiation Skills: Leveraging years’ worth legal acumen our team effectively negotiates with insurance companies fighting resiliently for fair payouts covering medical bills, lost wages and pain-and-suffering damages.

While proving liability might appear straightforward, insurance companies often try using tactics like comparative negligence theory attempting shifting blame on victims partly or wholly.With Carlson Bier by your side,you can rest assured knowing that you have aggressive yet compassionate advocates defending your rights and working assiduously towards securing the compensation you deserve.

It is important to note that Illinois operates under the statute of limitations – a time limit within which victims can file personal injury lawsuit. State law mandates that such claims must be filed within two years from accident date failing which it may result in outright dismissal of your case.

Also, if government property was implicated or a government employee during duty e.g a bus driver, there could potentially be different laws and timelines applicable to such cases.The complexities encapsulated necessitates expert legal counsel- understand this, we at Carlson Bier are prepared to offer our relentless services so you receive the justice entitlement you unfortunately found misplaced due to someone else’s careless behavior.

We invite you now not merely as empathetic consultants but also stalwarts who will stand beside and stride ahead where necessary fighting headstrong for you. To learn more about how Carlson Bier can assist with your pedestrian accident claim specifically tailored around Illinois state laws click on the button below.Delve deeper into understanding what your case could possibly be worth. You’ve suffered enough; let us maneuver those legal intricacies while simultaneously ensuring best representation thereby getting your life back on track. At Carlson Bier, we stand for justice, we stand for you!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Shelbyville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Shelbyville

Areas of Practice in Shelbyville

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Scald Injuries

Extending adept legal advice for victims of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Clinical Malpractice

Offering experienced legal assistance for clients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Accountability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, supplying expert legal services to customers affected by harmful products.

Aged Mistreatment

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Fall Injuries

Adept in managing trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking compensation for their suffering.

Newborn Injuries

Supplying legal support for families affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Crashes: Focused on guiding patients of car accidents secure reasonable remuneration for wounds and harm.

Scooter Incidents

Focused on providing legal support for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

18-Wheeler Collision

Providing professional legal representation for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for injuries.

Worksite Incidents

Focused on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Neurological Harms

Specializing in ensuring dedicated legal assistance for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Injuries

Specialized in managing cases for victims who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Expert in legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Demise

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and professional legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spine Harm

Expert in assisting persons with vertebral damage, offering professional legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​