...

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Sheldon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experience the superior advocacy of Carlson Bier, your trusted partner in navigating medical malpractice claims in Sheldon. We understand how medical negligence can shatter lives and are committed to securing justice for victims. With an impressive track record that spans over decades, our top-tier attorneys have made a mark in achieving substantial compensations for clients affected by medical errors and mishaps. At Carlson Bier, we maintain steadfast dedication towards challenging health care providers and protecting patients’ rights while demonstrating utmost respect for the legal norms of Illinois State. Our expertise extends to various dimensions of medical malpractice – be it misdiagnosis, surgical errors or medication mistakes. What sets us apart is our meticulous approach; every case undergoes intense investigation ensuring no detail is overlooked resulting in powerful negotiations or trial presentations when needed. Choose Carlson Bier today, as it isn’t just about picking a lawyer but placing faith on competence & stellar representation against any form of negligent harm caused by healthcare professionals.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Sheldon Illinois

Medical malpractice is a legal area with grave implications that demand the utmost attention, precision and expertise. As Carlson Bier, an Illinois-based personal injury law firm steeped in integrity and guided by a strong sense of justice, we are passionately dedicated to advocating for victims of medical malpractice. With our seasoned team of attorneys well-versed in litigating such cases, we aim to deliver a comprehensive understanding about this specific branch of law.

In essence, medical malpractice refers to situations where health care professionals fail to conform to established standards within their field, causing harm or even death due to negligence or incompetence. Recognizing when you’ve been subjected to medical malpractice can be challenging; hence it’s crucial that we outline the primary aspects herein:

Firstly, evidence must be presented that there existed a doctor-patient relationship between parties concerned which called for professional care or treatment.

Secondly, proof should clearly demonstrate that your healthcare provider deviated from commonly accepted professional protocols during your care.

Lastly but certainly not least important is establishing tangible links between these deviations and the resultant harm experienced by you as a patient.

Unfortunately, many instances occur under subtler circumstances making discernment difficult without deep-seated knowledge in both medical terminologies and practices alongside intricate judicial processes associated with proving medical malpractice.

At Carlson Bier we employ an all-encompassing investigative approach aimed at amassing substantial evidence requisite for envisioning powerful arguments on your behalf. From expert testimonials corroborating misconducts in professional standards adapted during administering treatments —to exhaustive proof confirming causative relationships linking practitioner’s laxity or gross oversight towards escalated symptoms or prolonged recoveries—we essentially leave no stone unturned resonate through claims guaranteeing rightful entitled remunerations.

Moreover, we also address matters concerning ‘Statute Of Limitations’ prevalent under Illinois state laws governing filing lawsuits against negligent healthcare providers—an additional testament stipulating how indispensible specialists like us can prove while navigating convoluted terrain amid distressing times.

Now it’s significant to know, financial damages awarded in medical malpractice suits typically fall within two broad categories: Compensatory and Punitive damages. Our proficient team will ensure the best possible outcome by pursuing compensatory settlements meant to offset direct implications brought upon due to malpractice like loss of income, medical bills, or pain and suffering. In instances where practitioner’s misconduct is isolatingly egregious justifying harsher penalties—for instance when gross negligence or intentional harm can be proven—we tactfully work towards influencing courts into awarding punitive damages beyond initial compensatory payouts.

Carlson Bier stands focused on powerfully advocating your rights while delivering personalized attention fostering comfortable environments allowing our clients better focus towards recuperating from traumatic episodes experienced at hands of healthcare providers initially entrusted with their well-being. We pledge unwavering commitment taking on these challenging circumstances shoulder-to-shoulder ensuring justice is served rightfully so for each of you entrusting us this grueling journey.

To wrap things up – remember, every case varies in intricacies laid out under individual narratives contending against accountable parties that prove resilient defending their standpoints fiercely thanks largely to equally competent counsels representing them. It crucially matters aligning causes alongside a personal injury attorney who thoroughly understands the nuances associated with such claims specifically within Illinois jurisprudence landscapes employing methods honed over years helping victimized patients.

Curious about what your case could potentially yield? The next step is simple yet crucial—click the button below to estimate how much your case is worth based on key facts surrounding your unique situation today! With Carlson Bier at your side, rest assured that you have someone equipped and fully committed toward seeing through the complexities poised by medical malpractice litigation until victoriously reached resolutions affirming deserving reparations you ought righteously claim as yours.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Sheldon Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Sheldon

Areas of Practice in Sheldon

Bicycle Incidents

Expert in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or hazardous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Supplying expert legal help for individuals of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Hospital Misconduct

Delivering experienced legal assistance for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Liability

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, supplying expert legal services to consumers affected by defective items.

Senior Misconduct

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Fall Accidents

Expert in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking restitution for their losses.

Childbirth Wounds

Supplying legal help for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Accidents: Concentrated on supporting patients of car accidents gain equitable compensation for injuries and harm.

Scooter Mishaps

Committed to providing legal advice for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Semi Collision

Ensuring specialist legal representation for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for damages.

Building Site Collisions

Engaged in representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cerebral Injuries

Committed to ensuring professional legal support for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Injuries

Expertise in handling cases for victims who have suffered damages from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Committed to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Demise

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and skilled legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Neural Damage

Specializing in representing victims with spine impairments, offering expert legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer