...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Sheridan

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or your loved ones become victims of dog bite injuries within Sheridan, the trusted legal team at Carlson Bier is ready to help. Whether we engage in negotiations with insurance companies or take them head-on in court when necessary, our years of experience handling such cases ensures that due justice will not elude our clients. Dog bite injuries can be severe and life-altering, potentially leading to significant medical costs, emotional distress and potential loss of wages; thus it’s imperative for one to secure exceptional representation immediately after incidents occur. The seasoned attorneys at Carlson Bier are adept at unraveling complex liability issues related to dog bites; assuring each client recovers maximum compensation allowed under Illinois law professionally and ethically. Swift, comprehensive investigations grant us vital insights into individual cases contributing significantly towards successful litigation processes as well as financial recovery schemes for victims involved. Clients have hailed Carlson Bier as their undaunted champion against powerful opponents – making us your best bet when pursuing restitution from dog-bite inflicted damages.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Sheridan Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury cases and we understand that being the victim of a dog bite can be a traumatic experience. As top-tier attorneys based in Illinois, our aim is more than just offering legal support; it begins with educating you about every aspect of your dog bite case.

Dog bites may often seem minor but their appearances are misleading. Even the smallest puncture wound from a dog bite can lead to serious infections such as tetanus or rabies. More severe injuries could result in lasting nerve damage, disfigurement, emotional trauma and even fatalities. It’s vital to seek immediate medical attention following a dog bite incident not only for proper treatment but also ensuring precise documentation of your injuries which serves as crucial evidence.

When dealing with dog bite incidents, there are few key factors worth noting:

• Liability: In Illinois, based on the “strict liability rule,” if a person is bitten or injured by a dog due to an attack or aggressive behavior in either public areas or lawfully private properties, the owner stands responsible.

• Statute of Limitations: The time framework to file a lawsuit varies from state to state. In Illinois, it’s within two years from when the injury took place.

• Comparative Negligence Rule: An exception to strict liability rule where if the victim provoked the animal intentionally causing this mishap then compensation might diminish proportionally.

Additionally while seeking compensation for medical expenses is expected, victims can also claim damages for pain and suffering caused by trauma post-incident affecting daily routine and quality of life dynamically ‘known as non-economic damages’. Insurance settlements frequently undervalue these intangible aspects thus proving our assistance irreplaceable for securing optimum reparation.

The proactive team at Carlson Bier stays committed towards transforming complex jargon into understandable language facilitating an easy navigation through entire litigation process untill successful resolution. From helping gather compelling evidences including browsing surveillance footage near accident location (if available), to skilful negotiation and even representing in trial if required – every step, we navigate with you.

A crucial characteristic of the Carlson Bier approach is our dedication towards prioritizing open communication. By consistently updating clients about case proceedings while offering clarity on any queries, we strive to ensure your peace of mind throughout this journey as our most valuable achievement.

At Carlson Bier, we also understand that dog bite injuries are not just physical scars but emotional wounds too. We carry forth compassion and empathy along with aggressive representation to get you the justice and compensation deserved – a combination setting us apart in this industry passionately.

Our years of exhaustive experience dealing with various insurance companies have equipped us immensely using their tactics effectively for procuring highest feasible settlements or awards assuaging overall impact made by these unfortunate incidents on clients’ lives minimizing hassle significantly .

Lastly, no financial constraints should deter the path towards justice affecting outcome favorably hence; working on contingency basis making legal aid accessible universally irrespective financial capacities where fees comes into picture only after successful settlement or verdict attainment . To evaluate chances of maximum claim recovery potential from your unique situation please click on the button below and let’s begin restoring harmony disrupted abruptly. Secure your rightful place stepping today courageously by trusting experienced guidance from Carlson Beir.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Sheridan Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Sheridan

Areas of Practice in Sheridan

Cycling Mishaps

Expert in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Burns

Supplying professional legal assistance for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Providing professional legal assistance for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Liability

Handling cases involving defective products, providing adept legal guidance to customers affected by harmful products.

Elder Misconduct

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Trip Incidents

Skilled in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking recovery for their harm.

Infant Wounds

Delivering legal aid for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Crashes: Devoted to helping sufferers of car accidents obtain reasonable remuneration for damages and losses.

Bike Accidents

Specializing in providing legal services for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Semi Collision

Offering adept legal services for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for hurts.

Building Site Accidents

Focused on assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Brain Impairments

Specializing in delivering specialized legal representation for clients suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Injuries

Expertise in handling cases for persons who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Committed to legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Passing

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and experienced legal support to ensure compensation.

Backbone Trauma

Committed to advocating for clients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​