FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Sidney

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the aftermath of traumatic dog bite injuries in Sidney, knowing what legal steps to take can be complex. Carlson Bier is your foremost choice for expertise and guidance during these challenging times. Our team of skilled attorneys have a proven track record with this trove of personal injury cases – they possess intimate familiarity with the nuances of Illinois laws pertaining to dog bites, thus helping you navigate every step effectively. At Carlson Bier, we believe that swift and thorough action is paramount for successful outcomes; our steadfast commitment towards clients’ very individual needs drives us for better results every time – as testimonies from myriad satisfied clients affirm.

Furthermore, despite not physically based in Sidney, you still receive timely service like we are local (strictly compliant with Illinois law). We extend supportive teleconsultations ensuring easy accessibility without compromising on personalized care or proficiency levels typically associated with being ‘local’. Choose none but Carlson Bier when seeking diligent representation for unfortunate canine-inflicted trauma – because here at Carlton & Bier nothing matters more than putting your health and best interest first. Trust us for prompt justice under compelling circumstances caused by dog bite incidents within Sidney’s jurisdiction.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Sidney Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we provide expert legal services in various personal injury cases and our experience extends notably into the specific field of Dog Bite Injuries. Based in Illinois, we understand that being bitten by a dog is not only a horrifyingly traumatic event but can also result in significant physical harm and financial burden due to medical bills and work absences.

The aftermath of such incidents often creates an overwhelming amount of stress for victims which demands clear-cut information and guidance about their rights according to Illinois law. Therefore, it is important to know that if you or your loved ones have suffered from dog bite injuries, several forms of compensation are potentially within your reach: recovery for present and future medical expenses, pain and suffering, loss of earning capacity, loss of normal life activities among others.

Key things to remember:

• The state of Illinois operates under strict liability laws pertaining to dog bites – ensuring the owner remains liable even if they were unaware their dog was dangerous.

• Time is critical when dealing with these cases – the statute of limitations imposes that lawsuits must be filed within two years after the injury occurred.

• Gathering evidence proving the incident took place without provocation on your part will strengthen your claim.

• Every case is unique; hence compensation varies significantly depending upon the severityof injuries, level of negligence displayed by the pet owner etc.

We want you to understand how critical it is not just for us at Carlson Bier – this necessitates dispelling common misconceptions surrounding “Dog Bite Law”. Firstly, there’s no requirement proving aggressive behavior from dogs in prior conducts unlike other personal injury cases where demonstrating previous negligent character strengthens plaintiff’s argument. Identification matters too; failing to correctly identify offending animal might jeopardize whole proceedings irrespective size or breed being immaterial during lawsuit filing processes under particular statutes exercised across Illinois jurisdiction.

Our team at Carlson Bier bring dedication combined with expertise inchurning complex legal jargon into comprehensible advice enabling clients navigate efficiently through various procedures involved addressing personal injury lawsuits. We understand intricacy these cases hold thus reassurance maximum effort exerted helping recover all compensations owed follow dog bites victims across Illinois.

Every situation is unique, and the circumstances of your personal incident play a crucial role in determining its outcome. No two cases are exactly alike, which means you need legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances for absolute clarity on potential outcomes.

As responsible personal injury attorneys, we do not pre-emptor provide overambitious estimations about compensation figures. Instead, our primary focus always rests on providing accurate information aimed at empowering you with knowledge, ensuring that decisions made align with your best interests.

Should you choose to proceed further by filing a lawsuit or settling outside court –we ensure supporting pleas are meticulously structured reflecting facts completely while pursuing highest possible recovery optimized according client’s needs.

Navigating the law surrounding Dog Bite Injuries can be a daunting task alone – this is why having capable representation from Carlson Bier allows shifting burdensome aspects onto us leaving clients concentrate advancing towards recovery unhindered by complex litigation processes.

To learn more about our approach and how it could benefit your circumstance specifically; let Carlson Bier assist in getting as much relevant information possible regarding injuries suffered due unruly dogs owned negligent pet owners all exceeded beyond standard care expectation levels. To gain insight onto what extent damages could possibly accumulated based parameters instituted throughout Illinois’ jurisdictions– don’t hesitate clicking button below determine prospective case worth appeal accomplishments reflect dedication towards handling such sensitive issues utmost sincerity hence reassuring everyone out there facing similar plight their interest never undermined any cost whatsoever here at Carlson Bier.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Sidney Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Sidney

Areas of Practice in Sidney

Cycling Collisions

Dedicated to legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Supplying professional legal assistance for people of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Physician Negligence

Providing dedicated legal services for patients affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Obligation

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, offering adept legal guidance to victims affected by faulty goods.

Aged Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Stumble Mishaps

Specialist in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking redress for their damages.

Birth Harms

Offering legal help for families affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Accidents

Incidents: Committed to helping victims of car accidents get fair compensation for hurts and damages.

Scooter Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal services for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Offering specialist legal support for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for injuries.

Construction Site Incidents

Concentrated on supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cerebral Harms

Focused on extending compassionate legal advice for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Traumas

Proficient in tackling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Collisions

Committed to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Demise

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and skilled legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Neural Impairment

Expert in defending individuals with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440