...

Medical Malpractice Attorney in South Chicago

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the aftermath of medical malpractice in South Chicago, turn to trusted legal champions at Carlson Bier. Distinctly knowledgeable about Illinois laws and staunch advocates for victims’ rights, our attorneys handle every case with unrivaled precision. Extensive litigation experience allows us to navigate complex healthcare scenarios, holding accountable those whose negligence has caused physical harm or emotional distress. We firmly believe that patients should trust their healthcare providers completely – any breach of this trust calls for justice. Our success is rooted in our meticulous approach and an empathetic understanding of our clients’ ordeal. Decades-long practice underpins a robust record of substantial verdicts won on behalf of the aggrieved parties across different tiers within the state’s medical community – from individual practitioners to large set-ups like hospitals or clinics. When results matter most, rely on Carlson Bier as your proactive partner who aims not only to surpass legal expectations but also restore faith lost due to unfortunate circumstances involving negligent medical care.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in South Chicago Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury lawsuits, taking particular interest in Medical Malpractice cases. Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare provider fails to meet the accepted standard of care, resulting in harm or injury to a patient. The complexity of these claims tends to be higher than typical personal injury cases, hence necessitating the need for skilled representation such as that provided by our seasoned team.

Our Illinois-based team is committed to providing value through detailed educational content around medical malpractice. This includes understanding what constitutes a successful claim: proof of negligence, harm due to this negligence and tangible consequences because of this damage. It’s critical to understand that not every unfortunate outcome from a medical treatment or procedure qualifies as negligence – there are instances where health complications occur despite proper precautions and correct conduct on part of the medical practitioners. In scenarios where you suffered harm after receiving sub-standard care which directly led to significant injuries or suffering, then you may have a valid case.

At Carlson Bier, our role is defined by championing for our clients’ rights relentlessly while ensuring legal jargon never clouds their comprehension of case progress:

• Negligence Proof: Establishing that your healthcare provider did indeed violate the adequate standard of care during your treatment.

• Harm Demonstration: Providing solid evidence that it’s solely due to this negligent act you suffered specific damages.

• Damage Quantification: Calculating realistic representation of any financial losses incurred due to additional medical bills, lost wages alongside monetary approximation for pain and suffering endured.

Utmost commitment towards client satisfaction sets us apart from other law firms within Illinois State limits; thus all interactions with us are earmarked by professionalism right at the onset with transparent communication about lawsuit details and possible outcomes without unwarranted promises. Our track record speaks volumes about our ability – leveraging tactical expertise drawn from decades-long collective experience has earned us momentous victories marked by substantial compensation sums awarded favorably in favour of our clients.

Understanding medical malpractice deeply and how it influences both your daily life and long-term plans allows us to build compelling cases by skillfully articulating the gravity of negligence impact in legal terms. Dotted with strong ties within the local community, being a part of Carlson Bier ensures you never walk alone in this investigative and litigation journey- you have empathetic allies working round the clock to turn tables in your favour.

Under Illinois law, solidifying your claim for medical malpractice has time limits applicable; typically, one must file a lawsuit within two years (statute of limitations) after you knew about the injury or could have reasonably known about the harm but filing no later than four years following negligent act occurrence. It is important to remember these are typical guidelines and some exceptions can affect them – another reason why professional legal counsel proves invaluable.

No case is off-the-table when seeking justice served at Carlson Bier. Whether circumstances involve diagnosis errors leading to non-treatment or wrong treatment of a disease, erroneous medication dosage leading to harmful side effects or surgical errors during procedures causing unforeseen complications; our firm is ready to dissect every layer necessary ensuring all grounds covered thoroughly for maximum possible compensation winnable.

Medical Malpractice lawsuits are undoubtedly burdensome : not only do they require navigating through delicate health information, they also necessitate enforcing judicial rigour in consolidating your case’s stature competently against resourceful defense teams often employed by accused parties. Rely on us to shoulder this burden while you focus fully on healing optimately.

As experts well versed with Medical Malpractice claims under Illinois laws, we feel obligated further strengthening public awareness around this facet beyond representing clients fearlessly. We invite all readers who suspect themselves victimized by healthcare negligence related suffering exploring personalized case evaluations with us – just click on the button below initiating absolutely free assessment helping understand what persuasive potential lies inherent within your complaint parameters probably unlocking considerable compensatory worth confronting medical trauma caused by unwanted malpractice. At Carlson Bier, your voyage towards justice is never a solo one.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For South Chicago Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in South Chicago

Areas of Practice in South Chicago

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Offering specialist legal support for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Healthcare Negligence

Ensuring expert legal assistance for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Fault

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, providing specialist legal guidance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble & Slip Accidents

Expert in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking justice for their losses.

Birth Wounds

Delivering legal assistance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Incidents

Crashes: Devoted to aiding sufferers of car accidents receive fair payout for damages and harm.

Motorbike Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal advice for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Trucking Accident

Offering professional legal services for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for harms.

Construction Mishaps

Focused on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Focused on delivering expert legal support for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Wounds

Proficient in handling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Accidents

Expert in legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Loss

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and expert legal support to ensure restitution.

Spine Harm

Expert in advocating for patients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal support to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer