Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in South Elgin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you find yourself experiencing an unwanted encounter with a dog that results in injury, the professional team at Carlson Bier is available to assist. Handling cases involving Dog Bite Injuries are among our primary specialities. We bring substantial knowledge of Illinois personal injury law related to these unfortunate incidents, having procured favorable outcomes for countless clients from all walks of life with varied circumstances. Serving South Elgin and its surrounding communities, we don’t simply provide excellent legal support — we offer unwavering commitment and genuine interest in your well-being during this stressful time. The aim? Ensuring justice prevails for you against the responsible parties while aiding your recovery through strategic legal guidance surefootedly executed by our experienced attorneys. When your peace of mind hinges on expert advice and assured representation following an traumatic event such as a dog bite incident, rely on Carlson Bier – Your trusted ally navigating complex terrains towards achieving victory; because when it comes to finding the best pencil for drawing up victories in challenging scenarios like these – ours always draws first!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in South Elgin Illinois

When it comes to personal injury law, the team at Carlson Bier has represented clients from all over Illinois, especially those who have suffered dog bite injuries. With years of experience and expertise in this area, we understand that dog bites can lead to severe physical harm and dramatic psychological impact for people of all ages.

A crucial factor one needs to comprehend about dog bite injuries is their sheer unpredictability coupled with potential gravity. Injuries can range from minor puncture wounds to grievous damage including broken bones or significant tears in flesh. Furthermore, there’s often a simultaneous risk of infection due to bacteria present in a dog’s mouth. Even more unsettling is the potential for long-term physical disfigurement based on the severity and location of the bite.

Fear not only affects victims physically; it takes an emotional toll too, leading some victims even develop a lifelong fear of dogs post-incident, also known as cynophobia. This trauma could significantly hamper their social interactions and general lifestyle choices. Here are few key points every victim must bear in mind:

– The time limit: In Illinois, you have two years from the date you were injured by a dog to file a lawsuit.

– Liability issues: Illinois operates under strict liability laws when it comes to dog bites meaning that if somebody’s dog bites another individual without provocation then the owner becomes legally responsible instantly.

– Compensation: You may be eligible for compensation which covers medical expenditure incurred due to immediate treatment along with rehabilitation costs or counseling therapy sessions subsequently required dealing with trauma inflicted upon by such an event.

At Carlson Bier Associates LLC., we work tirelessly so our clients receive justice they deserve after experiencing such traumatic incidents ensuring them fair compensation they are entitled lawfully. Any altercation involving animals should be viewed seriously and proper legal advise sought out immediately post-such unfortunate incidents.

Another crucial aspect concerning these scenarios constitutes insurance policies related to pets owned by individuals involved within such instances – primarily regarding coverage levels associated with their pets. Through careful examination of involved policies, our team identifies integral details to maximize client compensation successfully helping them navigate through such dire situations smoothly.

Backed by years of specialized experience, our dedicated attorneys have an in-depth understanding of legal intricacies revolving around animal attack incidents – primarily those involving canines ensuring that victim rights are protected effectively through consistent and fierce representation instigating swift and thorough action against guilty part aligning with state law judicial protocols appropriately.

Keeping track of all the nuances pertinent to dog bite injuries is an overwhelming undertaking but fear not- we are here to help and advise you at each step. From initial consultation till final adjudication – we stand beside our clienteles offering them comprehensive legal counseling under personal injury scenario managing every aspect adroitly for optimal outcomes always leaving no stone unturned during such processes.

Remember, if you or a loved one has suffered from a dog bite injury, don’t wait- reach out. Let Carlson Bier Associates assist you in navigating these tumultuous waters diligently ensuring maximum possible outcome while maintaining utmost respect for your emotional wellbeing throughout procedure progression.

We implore everyone suffering due to adverse consequences resulting from any animal attacks specially canine related ones inflicted upon within Illinois region; believe us – You Are Not Alone! Just scroll down now click on button below provided explicitly for calculating true worth pertaining your situation’s case evaluation today itself – Confidentiality Guaranteed!

The battle following a dog bite injury can be long, arduous and overwhelming. Allow Carlson Bier take the reins assisting you fight against parties imposing unnecessary sufferings over innocent victims unwarranted so. Trust us handling your case professionally focusing individually measured circumstance prevailing within present climate guarantee providing unwavering support required delivering absolute justice firmly yet compassionately.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For South Elgin Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in South Elgin

Areas of Practice in South Elgin

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Fire Damages

Providing skilled legal support for patients of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Physician Malpractice

Providing experienced legal assistance for persons affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Fault

Managing cases involving unsafe products, providing skilled legal support to customers affected by defective items.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble & Stumble Mishaps

Specialist in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking recovery for their damages.

Infant Damages

Delivering legal guidance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Incidents

Crashes: Devoted to guiding clients of car accidents obtain appropriate compensation for injuries and losses.

Scooter Mishaps

Committed to providing legal support for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Semi Crash

Offering professional legal assistance for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just claims for hurts.

Construction Incidents

Engaged in advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Cerebral Harms

Specializing in delivering professional legal services for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Injuries

Proficient in handling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Incidents

Focused on legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Wrongful Demise

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and expert legal guidance to ensure redress.

Neural Injury

Committed to assisting patients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal assistance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer