Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in South Elgin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a slip and fall accident, consider Carlson Bier. As expert personal injury attorneys, they provide high-quality service tailored for the South Elgin community’s needs. Their extensive knowledge of Illinois law allows them to vigorously pursue your case. They believe that anyone who suffers from a slip and fall accident due to negligence deserves fair compensation. Choosing Carlson Bier means choosing relentless advocacy, meticulous case preparation, and compassionate support every step of the way. They’ve successfully represented many individuals in South Elgin on similar premises liability matters hence attesting their mastery in this area of practice. With renowned resilience in courtrooms and negotiable proceedings alike, they strive to secure maximum settlement for their clients’ injuries and damages incurred during such mishaps.Established reputation coupled with winning track record make Carlson Bier an ideal consideration when seeking representation after experiencing a slip-and-fall accident.As your advocate,Carter Biers highlighted priority is helping you overcome legal roadblocks so you can focus on healing,recovery,and moving forward.Space constraints

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in South Elgin Illinois

Owing to our unparalleled dedication and expert insights in personal injury law, Carlson Bier has established itself as a premier attorney group within the Illinois judicial landscape. Predominantly, we specialize in handling cases surrounding slip and fall accidents—occurrences that often lead to devastating injuries but go unremarked on account of misinformation or lack of understanding about legal entitlements.

The simple truth is that slip and fall accidents are far from trivial; they can result in severe physical damage like broken bones, spinal cord injuries, brain trauma, or even paralytic consequences. The financial burden to cope with such conditions can be exorbitant. This doesn’t even factor into consideration the mental toll an accident takes, embedding fear and vulnerability deep into one’s psyche. That’s why at Carlson Bier, we persistently advocate for accident victims’ rights so they don’t have to brave this journey alone.

To facilitate a better comprehension of your legal standing after a slip and fall incident, consider these key points:

– Legal claims may be filed if your accident occurred due to negligence on someone else’s part.

– Negligence refers to irresponsible conduct leading towards hazardous environments like slippery floors or broken staircases.

– Notably not all slips or falls constitute valid grounds for filing lawsuits – proving negligence is pivotal for eligibility.

– Gathering substantial evidence post-injury via medical records showing severity-damages inflicted facilitates stronger case development before court proceedings.

As seasoned attorneys recognized across Illinois catering frequently to clients grappling with similar issues—we’ve honed our knack for decoding complex jargons into comprehensible terms while providing guidance every step along this arduous journey.

We understand the unsaid pain afflicting you isn’t merely restricted by bodily harm but spills over onto familial relationships affected when their loved ones suffer—or occupational efficacy hindered due-to debilitating circumstances arising out-of such unfortunate incidents. It’s fundamental victims recoup—at least partially—their lost peace through rightful reparation and our legal guidance ensures navigating such pathways is less daunting.

Notably, time plays a crucial role as well. Illinois law stipulates the statute of limitations for filing slip and fall accident cases at two years post-incident. This essentially means if you’ve been a victim of a slip or fall due to someone else’s negligence, it’s prudent not merely from an recovery standpoint but also legally—to reach out to us sooner rather than later.

Navigating these intricate processes may seem perplexing—more so when you’re already grappling with trauma’s aftermath. That’s why we at Carlson Bier believe in lending our experience-infused insights to help demystify this process.

Indeed, each case presents its unique set of challenges—but hold no assumptions about your situation either being too complex or lacking necessary gravitas before seeking professional input. The value isn’t only restricted to gaining rightful reparations—or receiving deserved justice—but also extends unto individual perpetuation simply by chipping away persistently inherited misconceptions associated with personal injury claims like those surrounding slip and fall accidents.

As part of our commitment towards invoking legal awareness, we invite you to explore your options further below. Like mentioned earlier: each situation envelops its own degree-of severity—which naturally transfers onto assessments gauging potential compensatory outcomes. Our team waits on standby ready not merely to provide an actionable roadmap but also proposing expected monetary awards catering directly from incidents stemming out of slips or falls caused by others’ negligence.

So empower yourself today—click the button below—and have seasoned experts analyze what your case truly holds, helping better understand just how much could potentially be claimed owing to unjust circumstances unfairly foisted upon you—seek justice; seek peace; seek Carlsson Bier assistance now!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For South Elgin Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in South Elgin

Areas of Practice in South Elgin

Bicycle Crashes

Proficient in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Extending professional legal support for victims of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Healthcare Malpractice

Ensuring dedicated legal services for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Fault

Handling cases involving problematic products, offering professional legal assistance to consumers affected by defective items.

Elder Neglect

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble and Slip Incidents

Skilled in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking justice for their suffering.

Birth Damages

Extending legal guidance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Incidents: Devoted to aiding individuals of car accidents obtain just settlement for wounds and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Truck Accident

Extending specialist legal representation for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for harms.

Building Mishaps

Focused on assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Brain Damages

Committed to offering dedicated legal support for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Harms

Proficient in addressing cases for persons who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unfair Loss

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and adept legal services to ensure justice.

Backbone Damage

Expert in representing victims with paralysis, offering expert legal representation to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer