FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in South Elgin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Facing a spinal cord injury is undeniably overwhelming; these cases demand expert legal direction. If you are seeking exceptional representation in South Elgin, consider Carlson Bier—an acclaimed personal injury law firm in Illinois. Specializing in spinal cord injuries, we understand the unique challenges such cases entail and navigate them with acute expertise to secure your just compensation.

Our formidable acumen lies not only on our vast experience but also our devoted focus on each case—one client at a time. We meticulously pore over every facet of your case to unfold key details essential for a robust litigation strategy.

At Carlson Bier, expect fiercely dedicated advocates ready to fight tooth and nail for you—because behind every claim is an individual who deserves justice as much as they need healing from their traumatic ordeal.

Whether it involves negotiation or setting foot inside the courtroom journeying towards that rightful verdict and settlement, rest assured you will not be alone. Count on Carlson Bier—the powerful ally synonymous with strength amidst adversity—as your ultimate partner throughout this arduous process.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in South Elgin Illinois

Founded on an unwavering commitment to seek justice for the injured, our law firm Carlson Bier brings together a cohesive team of respected personal injury attorneys in Illinois. Having represented several clients with varying degrees and scopes of spinal cord injuries, we enriched our professional praxis focusing on the nuances of such complex cases.

A spinal cord injury can have life-altering implications, warranting sustained medical attention and potentially impacting one’s ability to earn a living. These are categorized as complete and incomplete injuries. A complete spinal cord injury leads to total paralysis below the site of trauma while an incomplete injury allows some function preservation beneath said site. Causes range widely from car crashes, falls, sports accidents up to violent encounters but however it happens, this significant havoc to one’s life justifies equitable restitution.

The array of challenges that besets victims go beyond physical debilitation: psychological impact counts among them. It isn’t rare to find individuals battling post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression or anxiety following their trauma-induced adjustments. Overlooked by many yet enormously important is social alienation wherein individuals with a spinal cord injury may feel outcast or ostracized due in large part to stigma or misconceptions about their condition.

If you live with such an experience inflicted upon you through another party’s negligence, remember these cardinal points:

• You have rights – The Illinois legal framework leans favorably towards protecting accident victims.

• Preserving evidence matters – This significantly strengthens your case if negotiations lead to trial.

• Timely filing – The statute of limitations for personal injury claims relating to spinal cord injuries in Illinois requires action within two years.

Navigating these complexities demands expert assistance which underscores Carlson Bier’s relevance at this juncture: as dedicated litigators seeking the best possible outcome on your behalf! Our extensive court experiences augur well for claimants dealing with uncaring insurance companies determined only on safeguarding their interest against yours. We labor relentlessly to unearth and present critical pieces of evidence that will substantiate your claim, therefore swaying the scales of justice favorably towards you.

You don’t merely need an attorney; you require a relentless advocate in your corner who understands firsthand the intricacies defining spinal cord injury cases – this is what Carlson Bier embodies. Our firm’s record of multimillion-dollar trial verdicts pays testament to our unwavering dedication in protecting clients’ rights.

Getting started with us involves no financial commitment from you because we operate on a “no win-no fee” policy: You pay only if we win! This relieves you of any upfront cost worries and lets us focus squarely on delivering a satisfactory outcome for you.

We encourage every potential client to seek immediate consultation without delay. Remember, action delayed could be justice denied! As an esteemed law firm operating legally within Illinois state, the Carlson Bier team offers unparalleled support focused on spinal cord injuries victims. Let us shoulder your burden by empowering your claim journey towards favorable settlements or court victories.

To discover how much your case might be worth click on the button below as a first step towards reclaiming control over your life once more. Embrace our steadfast promise: Here at Carlson Bier, where our outstanding personal injury legal service represents not just mere transactions, but transformative journeys towards healing and closure.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For South Elgin Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in South Elgin

Areas of Practice in South Elgin

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Focused on legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Scald Burns

Offering expert legal support for people of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Medical Malpractice

Providing professional legal advice for clients affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Liability

Handling cases involving faulty products, delivering professional legal guidance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Abuse

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Stumble Injuries

Specialist in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking redress for their losses.

Newborn Injuries

Offering legal aid for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Accidents

Crashes: Committed to aiding individuals of car accidents get equitable payout for wounds and harm.

Scooter Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Semi Mishap

Providing specialist legal representation for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for losses.

Building Site Collisions

Committed to defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Head Impairments

Committed to ensuring compassionate legal advice for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at addressing cases for victims who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Expert in legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unjust Loss

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and adept legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Committed to defending persons with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440