Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in South Holland

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in providing legal service for Spinal Cord Injuries. Our extraordinary blend of comprehensive knowledge, dedication and compassion has carved us a niche reputation as reliable allies navigating the complex landscape of personal injury law. One life-altering incident can wreak havoc on your livelihood and peace; our formidable team champions those facing this situation by tirelessly pursuing compensation to alleviate financial strain from mounting medical costs. We understand that every spinal cord injury case holds unique circumstances, engendering distinctive challenges. That’s why we tailor personalized strategies designed to maximize results for each client – because justice isn’t one size fits all. Trust is fundamental in attorney-client relationships, at Carlson Bier it isn’t taken lightly – your battle becomes ours too! If you’re contending with a spinal cord injury anywhere including South Holland area or need qualified advice on Illinois laws pertaining to such injuries; look no further than us: dedicated advocates relentlessly fighting for your rights ensuring injurious parties are held accountable!

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in South Holland Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our experienced team of personal injury attorneys has championed the rights of individuals who have suffered spinal cord injuries due to accidents or negligence. Based in Illinois, we are wholly committed to providing you with meticulous legal assistance that takes into account your individual circumstance and needs. Spinal cord injuries cause significant distress – physically, emotionally, and financially – some scenarios often overlooked by insurance companies. The stress caused by mounting medical bills coupled with an inability to work makes such a situation extremely overwhelming.

Spinal Cord Injuries need careful scrutiny as they largely impact victim’s lives regardless of its severity – whether it leads to partial impairment or full-blown paralysis. Furthermore:

– They require extensive rehabilitation and therapy

– It may entail costly home modifications for accessibility

– There usually are substantial costs involved involving medication management,

– The potential for life-long loss of income due to limited mobility warrants consideration.

Navigating through this daunting legal landscape requires expertise which our attorneys at Carlson Bier possess in abundance. We consider all essential factors while preparing your case from facilitating initial talks with insurance companies right up to negotiating settlements or fighting tenaciously in court if needed to get you the justice you deserve on time.

Understanding the implications of spinal cord injuries is crucial before moving towards legal action. These catastrophic accidents could result from varied situations including but not limited to vehicle collisions, slip-and-falls, sports incidents, or even acts of violence:

• A ‘complete’ injury implies total loss of function below the level of injury,

• An ‘incomplete’ injury indicates some degree of function remains below the level of the wound.

• Paraplegia represents paralysis from waist down affecting legs and lower body functions.

• Quadriplegia/Tetraplegia denotes impairment in all four limbs resulting from damage occurring around neck area.

These intricate details can profoundly affect settlements in terms for recompense and accommodation adjustments therefore comprehensive precise medical validation is of the essence.

At Carlson Bier, we believe that no one should be forced to shoulder the physical and financial burdens arising from another person’s negligence. Our team holds an impeccable record in handling such complex cases with finesse. With a reputation for structuring powerful strategies that yield advantageous outcomes, our clients can attest to us landing favorable verdicts and settlements.

Securing rightful compensation isn’t just about reparation; it’s also about bringing a semblance of normalcy back into your life. We understand your need to feel cared for and valued during these challenging times – this is why at Carlson Bier we prioritize offering personalized attention over adopting a high-volume approach.

Our commitment remains unwavering towards facilitating recovery, long-term care, expected future treatments costs or any life-altering adjustments you may require. At every juncture, our legal guidance is centered around achieving maximum attainable restitution so as to reduce undue hardships borne by victims and their loved ones as much as possible.

Lastly, remember that navigating intricate laws alone can seem daunting – it’s not necessary you do so when exceptional legal representation exists at arm’s reach! Use this moment to empower yourself; garner comprehensive insights into your specific situation beyond what has been provided here. Click on the button below now to uncover exactly how much your case could potentially be worth – justice delayed is justice denied after all! Know your rights, claim what is rightfully yours with Carlson Bier today.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For South Holland Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in South Holland

Areas of Practice in South Holland

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Giving skilled legal advice for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Hospital Malpractice

Providing professional legal assistance for victims affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Accountability

Managing cases involving defective products, supplying specialist legal guidance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Neglect

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Fall Incidents

Expert in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking redress for their suffering.

Neonatal Harms

Delivering legal support for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Mishaps: Devoted to supporting clients of car accidents secure just settlement for damages and harm.

Scooter Collisions

Expert in providing legal services for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

18-Wheeler Collision

Offering adept legal assistance for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for hurts.

Worksite Mishaps

Engaged in representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Cerebral Injuries

Focused on delivering dedicated legal assistance for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Traumas

Expertise in addressing cases for victims who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Committed to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unfair Demise

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Neural Injury

Dedicated to assisting clients with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer