Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in South Wilmington

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a spinal cord injury is a life-altering event, and the ramifications are often exceedingly significant. The need for competent, compassionate legal representation during such times cannot be overstated. This is where Carlson Bier stands tall as an outstanding advocate for victims of such injuries in all parts of Illinois including South Wilmington. When your world has been turned upside down by a catastrophic spinal cord injury, our expert attorneys ensure you get the respect and compensation you rightly deserve.

Our specialty lies in understanding the complex medical issues associated with these unique injuries while facilitating justice through tenacious advocacy that aims to secure optimal outcomes for our valued clients. Every incidents’ contextual variables shape bespoke approaches we adhere too: ensuring maximum benefits are secured swiftly while adhering to law’s ever-changing dynamics.

At Carlson Bier, we strive beyond standard representations – forging strong attorney-client relationships anchored in trust and mutual respect. If knowledge combined with compassion served meticulously defines your search criteria for choosing a lawyer following devastating spinal cord trauma, consider placing your faith in us; Carlson Bier – providing exceptional legal services throughout Illinois.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in South Wilmington Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated advocates for those who have suffered spinal cord injuries. Our personal injury lawyers understand the profound effects of these traumatic events on an individual’s life and are prepared to fight proficiently for their rights in Illinois.

Spinal cord injuries often stem from unfortunate incidents such as vehicular accidents, slips and falls, medical malpractice or sports and recreation accidents. The after-effects can be overwhelming – lacking mobility, continuous discomfort, and psychological stress leaving many victims feeling powerless.

The impact of a spinal cord injury varies heavily depending upon the severity. Take note of these crucial points:

• Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: It may result in partial movement beneath the area where damage occurred.

• Complete Spinal Cord Injury: These injuries often lead to absolute paralysis known as either Tetraplegia/Quadriplegia or Paraplegia.

Navigating through the legal structure when trying to claim compensation for these injuries can get complex owing to the highly technical nature of medical reports that need interpretation plus quantifying lifetime costs involved post-injury.

At Carlson Bier, our commitment is towards making this process more manageable through providing you with comprehensive legal services tailored explicitly around your requirements. As extensive contributors in this arena across Illinois, we possess experienced attorneys equipped with advanced tools who conduct methodical reviews of all evidences concerned coupled with expert consultations ensuring you receive the maximum justified compensation recoverable under law.

Many individuals struggle to comprehend their right to demand reparation post-spinal cord damages. If negligence by another party directly led to your injury then you certainly have a lawful basis for seeking restitution. This could relate to failing adherence towards anticipated safety standards at workplaces causing accidents or even surgeons performing influencing operations without maintaining necessary caution leading towards inevitable harm.

It’s worth noting that identifying guilty parties goes beyond apparent suspects like reckless drivers; entities like manufacturing companies producing faulty vehicle parts also share responsibility if they indirectly caused your incident due to their shortcomings in quality control.

The Carlson Bier legal team is relentless when it comes to pursuing your case. We ensure the optimal outcome of each claim we handle, leaving no stone unturned when it comes to finding fault and liability. Your recovery, both physically and financially is our prime concern as we strive to shield you from further harm with a sense of dignity and respect.

But we also understand that time is the essence. In Illinois State, there’s a limit on how long an injured person can wait before filing a lawsuit – typically two years from the specific date the mishap took place.

As such, immediate intervention dictates success in cases around spinal cord injuries where evidence might change or get lost over time. Carlson Bier provides proficient representation upholding your interests whilst keeping you updated at every step helping you make informed decisions throughout the process.

To ensure you receive fair financial relief for losing employment opportunities, hefty medical bills incurred or to cater for future expenses post-injury pertaining towards livelihood modifications thereby enhancing accessibility; contact our office today without hesitation.

Wondering what your personal injury lawsuit could be worth? The value of each case varies based on the severity of sustained damages among other factors influencing assessment. Allow us to use professional expertise evaluating potential compensation rightfully due considering all suffered pains and losses combined with experienced insight into claims similar to yours which would guide us strategically framing your unique argument effectively commanding justified reimbursement.

Don’t let uncertainty hold back deserved justice any longer! By clicking on the button below ascertain exactly how much monetary restitution your case calls for reflecting true entitlements under Illinois law as affected victims of unfortunate incidents leading towards traumatic spinal cord injuries. Let’s fight together ensuring rightful compensation consequently fortifying steps towards effective recovery elevating future hopes through these tough times.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For South Wilmington Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in South Wilmington

Areas of Practice in South Wilmington

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Supplying adept legal advice for patients of intense burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Medical Incompetence

Delivering professional legal representation for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Fault

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering expert legal services to victims affected by faulty goods.

Elder Malpractice

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Trip Accidents

Skilled in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking justice for their losses.

Newborn Traumas

Providing legal support for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Accidents: Devoted to guiding individuals of car accidents get just payout for wounds and harm.

Motorcycle Collisions

Specializing in providing legal assistance for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Big Rig Accident

Ensuring adept legal support for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for harms.

Building Mishaps

Focused on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Dedicated to ensuring expert legal assistance for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Traumas

Expertise in addressing cases for victims who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Wrongful Passing

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and adept legal representation to ensure justice.

Spine Impairment

Expert in defending patients with paralysis, offering professional legal support to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer