...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Southern View

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When navigating the legal burden of dog bite injuries in Southern View, trust none other than Carlson Bier. As a distinguished personal injury law firm in Illinois, we specialize in dealing with intricate cases involving dog bite injuries. Our attorneys empathize with your pain and understand how significantly such ordeals can disrupt one’s life. We utilize deep domain knowledge to help you secure fair compensation for medical bills, lost wages, as well as emotional trauma. Despite numerous lawful complexities attached to an incidence like this, our proficient attorneys provide comprehensive factual support from the investigative phase until achieving satisfactory settlements or verdicts. In addition to our expertise on Illinois liability laws and regulations surrounding dog bites, we follow an aggressive approach when representing victims against perpetrator’s insurance companies who often prefer minimal payout amounts aiming at higher profits for themselves. Choose Carlson Bier’s dedicated team of experienced lawyers to safeguard your rights entailing substantial justice after experiencing a traumatic dog-bite incident within Southern View borders.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Southern View Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are unequivocally dedicated to championing the rights of our clients who have succumbed to injuries from dog bites. Our experienced team based out of Illinois exhibits exceptional knowledge and proficiency in personal injury law, with a particular focus on cases revolving around canine-induced harm. Dog bite injuries can be distressingly traumatizing both physically and emotionally. It’s only justified that you get compensated for your pain, medical expenses, lost wages, or psychological stress caused by such an unfortunate event.

Dog bites may render victims prone to numerous health hazards ranging from simple puncture wounds to significant tissue damage potentially leading to surgeries in severe cases. Added discomfort could include scarring or disfigurement which often leaves lasting emotional implications. The probability of infection is another critical matter as roughly 18% of all dog bites become infected with bacteria holding serious implications if left untreated.

We advocate knowing your rights when it comes to liability laws pertaining to dog bite injuries within the state of Illinois – every citizen should understand their legal standing. Here are some key points of interest:

• Owners hold strict liability: Often referred to as the “one-bite rule”, Illinois is one among few states where this regulation does not apply; hence owners cannot escape accountability claiming it was their pet’s first attack.

• No proof needed for negligence: To claim compensation in many states, victims need substantiated evidence beyond mere happenstance whereas under the rigid structure enforced within Illinois disappointing attempts at proving negligence aren’t necessary.

• Landlords may share liability: If bitten on private property, potential shared responsibility lies with landlords provided they were aware their tenant harbored an aggressive animal.

Working through these intricacies alone might appear daunting which is why seeking professional accolade proves beneficial more often than not during claims connected with egregious suffering encumbered by individuals due to these incidents.

In processing a personal injury lawsuit concerned with settling compensation related claims toward incurred damages through dog attacks, Carlson Bier is undoubtedly one of the most reputable access points you can contact. Documenting incidents, gathering thorough medical reports and establishing liability make up our comprehensive strategy aimed toward securing rightful reparation. We work diligently exploring every avenue to ensure total success when claiming your rights and don’t accept fees unless we win.

Not only does Carlson Bier strive to attain justifiable compensation, but our seasoned team also assists in ensuring victims receive appropriate medical treatment for injuries sustained from dog bites. Our relentless dedication has established a solid track record reflecting decades old consistency in achieving favorable settlements. Never underestimate the potential aftermath of dog bite injuries nor the specialized legal representation that Kimberley Danlow and associates offer at Carlson Bier.

Overwhelmed by understanding legality intricacies? The knowledge array sprawled out on our website supplies broad insight about personal injury law shedding comprehensive light on dog bite cases in Illinois to assure victims are apprised concerning their legal entitlements. At Carlson Bier, we believe firmly in determining full dimensions before proceeding with litigation pertaining effectively to these alarming occurrences.

Take your first step towards hassle-free recovery from traumatic distress induced through such dreadful incidents; click on the button below now to discover how much your case is worth without resorting to any guesswork equation but paved with professional discretion meriting maximum attainable reimbursement cutting no corners toward justice arriving rightfully at deserving parties’ doorstep. Rightfully claim what’s yours today with steadfast guidance from trusted professionals at Carlson Bier!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Southern View Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Southern View

Areas of Practice in Southern View

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Offering specialist legal support for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Healthcare Malpractice

Providing dedicated legal services for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Responsibility

Handling cases involving faulty products, providing specialist legal help to victims affected by defective items.

Geriatric Neglect

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Slip Incidents

Adept in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking justice for their suffering.

Birth Wounds

Extending legal assistance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Crashes

Accidents: Concentrated on supporting patients of car accidents secure appropriate recompense for injuries and destruction.

Scooter Mishaps

Expert in providing representation for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

18-Wheeler Accident

Providing adept legal services for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for injuries.

Worksite Accidents

Committed to advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Neurological Damages

Focused on ensuring specialized legal support for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Adept at tackling cases for people who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Expert in legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Wrongful Loss

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and professional legal representation to ensure justice.

Spine Trauma

Focused on representing persons with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​