FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Sparta

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When medical malpractice strikes, the repute and experience of your legal representation matters. For residents in Sparta and its surroundings, Carlson Bier has a history steeped in distinction when it comes to pursuing justice for victims of medical negligence. Our relentless advocacy and client-centered approach set us apart as we navigate complex legal issues with finesse etched from decades of practice. We firmly believe that no one should suffer due to preventable errors made by their healthcare providers, which is why our commitment extends beyond courtroom walls – into fighting for systemic change within Illinois’ healthcare institutions as well. With our seasoned litigators who specialize in dissecting intricate malpractice cases at Carlson Bier on your side; relief from the burden of injustice becomes more than just a possibility – it can become an attainable reality. Entrust us with turning forgettable pasts into formidable futures after adversity stemming from medical malpractice. Your journey towards justice starts here.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Sparta Illinois

At the law firm of Carlson Bier, we have devoted our practice to serving victims who have suffered due to medical malpractice throughout Illinois. Our team of dedicated personal injury attorneys is committed to advocating for clients whose lives have been disrupted by the negligence of healthcare providers. Medical malpractice can transform a life in an instant, inflicting physical pain, emotional distress and financial stress on patients and their families.

Medical malacpractice refers to situations where a healthcare provider deviates from accepted standards of care within the realm of medicine resulting in harm to patients. Such instances could encompass errors made during diagnosis or treatment, failure or delay in providing necessary treatment and errors occurring in medication administration or performance of surgery. It also involves a complex blend of law and medicine wherein specific proving criteria must be met: — you need show that there was indeed a standard of care applicable; — there was deviation from this set standard; —a significant injury resulted directly from this deviation.

This form of litigation requires specialized knowledge, tenacity, determination and careful study given its intricacy. This heralds the inherent necessity for an experienced legal partner capable enough to navigate this landscape and ensure your voice gets heard. At Carlson Bier, we bring together years’ worth experience in handling numerous such intricate cases with positive outcomes.

Our objective at Carlson Bier is two-fold: Firstly – We seek justice on behalf our client whilst holding responsible those practitioners who neglected their duty causing harm; Secondly – By successfully prosecuting these cases deterrence is created among potential future violators thereby improving overall quality patient care.

When choosing Carlson Bier as your legal representative:

• Expect zealous advocacy starting from initial consultation all through trial stage if needed.

• Benefit from extensive research led approach dissecting every case detail comprehensively ensuring maximum compensation.

• Leverage full scale investigations supplemented with expert testimonies establishing liable party’s fault indubitably.

• Partner with compassionate yet relentless attorneys advocating tirelessly until justice served.

• Avail contingent fee based service – meaning we do not get paid unless you recover.

There is no replacement for experienced representation when endeavoring to handle the complex issues related to medical malpractice. The landscape involves deciphering vast amounts of medical records, understanding complex cases, and presenting it in a framework that a layperson can understand. This process requires meticulous preparation and attention to detail – something which Carlson Bier’s attorneys are inherently skilled at doing.

Prospective clients should be aware that Illinois has a particular timeframe called statute of limitations within which a lawsuit must be filed following an act of negligence constituting medical malpractice. Ranked among top-quality personal injury law firms across Illinois, our team understands state specific guidelines ensuring all case parameters firmly adhered rendering your legal pursuit significantly more effective.

Looking out for victims’ rights forms core ethos here at Carlson Bier. Complete client satisfaction being our ultimate goal, we work resolutely jumping over each hurdle posed by intricate personal injury laws while leveraging extensive knowledgebase accumulated over decades fighting various such battles successfully.

So, if you or someone dear suffering due medical malpractice in Illinois let us shoulder this burden assuring adherence to highest professional standards coupled with unwavering dedication towards helping recover maximum possible compensation one rightfully deserves.

We invite you now to take charge – do not let negligent parties get away without substantial penalty – there could be multiple other silent sufferers who may wake up courage seeing justice served! Click on the button below and find out how much your case might be worth today from expert attorney group proudly serving victims statewide standing as true champions fighting medical malacpractice. Your path toward justice starts right now, with Carlson Bier.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Sparta Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Sparta

Areas of Practice in Sparta

Cycling Mishaps

Proficient in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or risky conditions.

Flame Wounds

Giving specialist legal help for patients of serious burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Healthcare Malpractice

Ensuring dedicated legal support for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Obligation

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, providing skilled legal support to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Mistreatment

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Trip Mishaps

Specialist in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking redress for their losses.

Infant Traumas

Extending legal support for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Accidents: Devoted to guiding victims of car accidents secure reasonable recompense for harms and damages.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal advice for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Offering professional legal services for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for harms.

Worksite Collisions

Concentrated on defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Injuries

Focused on providing expert legal assistance for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Injuries

Expertise in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Mishaps

Committed to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Fatality

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and professional legal assistance to ensure justice.

Neural Injury

Dedicated to supporting victims with spine impairments, offering professional legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​