...

Bicycle Accidents in Springfield

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with bicycle accidents in Springfield, the counsel and representation of Carlson Bier is an ideal choice. They provide unmatched expertise in personal injury law, specifically pertaining to bicycle accidents. Their attorneys tackle complex legal issues adeptly while empathizing with your situation to ensure justice prevails. With impressive records of securing compensations for victims, they are a trusted source of advocacy when you need it the most. Previously overlooked details or lesser-known laws can often shift a case drastically – this is where the attorneys shine as they combine their meticulous approach and profound knowledge to tilt cases favorably for clients. What contributes massively towards making them paramount in representing Springfield residents involved in bicycle accidents isn’t merely their prowess but also their dedication; at Carlson Bier every case matters deeply. Your resilience combined with our determination ensures optimal outcomes following unfortunate bicyle-related mishaps – cultivation of such an alliance makes all difference between fairness being served or denied. Let Carlson Bier navigate the intricate labyrinth of bike accident claims on your behalf instead.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Springfield Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our Illinois-based personal injury attorneys hold rich expertise in handling bicycle accident cases. Being both effective advocates and compassionate counselors in such adversative circumstances, we are the knowledgeable confidantes to turn to when suffering from the aftermath of a bicycle accident.

First and foremost, understanding what counts as a bicycle accident is essential. Simply put, if you’re cycling and sustain injuries due to another party’s negligence or unsafe conditions, it is a bicycle accident. This may cover instances where motorists neglect cyclists’ rights on roads, poor street maintenance causing unnecessary hazards or product malfunctions that could be blamed on manufacturers.

Experiencing a bicycle accident can lead to severe physical injuries at times. The immediate trauma includes skin abrasions – colloquially known as road rash-, fractures/broken bones caused by impactful contact with vehicles or hard ground surfaces, dental/jaw damage from similar impacts and traumatic brain injuries often resulting from not wearing protective helmets during accidents.

The repercussions go beyond just physical harm; mental distress weighs heavily too post-accident. Initially shock ridden but later depression can set in as individuals struggle with the idea of getting back on their beloved bikes again. Protracted periods of anxiety about future rides have been reported frequently among victims too.

Additionally, there is an immense financial burden linked with these accidents which range from medical bills for emergency treatment, ongoing health care costs (physical therapy/rehabilitation fees), loss of wages due to inability to work while recovering/ permanently depending upon injury severity and associated damages like bike repair/replacement costs.

In Illinois State Bicycle Accident Laws affirm cyclists’ legal rights same way as they do motor vehicle drivers’. If your bike crash was someone else’s fault – even partially – you are entitled for compensation claiming aforementioned expenses along with pain/suffering endured. As per comparative negligence law yes though invalidated if person’s own fault place 51%+ then completely dismissed hence effective operations require proficient counsel like lawyers here at Carlson Bier being well-versed this complexity adepted siphoning maximum compensation that you rightfully deserve.

Of course, bicycle accident cases are unique and their intricacies can vary depending on a host of factors such as the parties involved, circumstances leading up to the accident, violations of specific cycling laws and so forth. Even factors like the type of bike you were riding or whether you were wearing appropriate safety gear (like helmets) can play into how your case unfolds legally. This is why our learned personnel always adopt a personalized approach to each case we represent.

At Carlson Bier, our unrivaled experience in handling personal injury accidents in Illinois enables us to anticipate stumbling blocks often encountered during legal proceedings, ensuring these challenges don’t impede justice serving victims.

Having discussed extensively about the nature and aftermath of bicycle accidents along with professional advice about the same, we hope that you have gained significant insights regarding potential pitfalls and strategic remedies related with them. However understanding complexities engulfing adversities under this category yields better outcomes when enthusiasts get compliant counsel therefore advocate pursuing legal help for rightful damage reclamation upon unfortunate incidents occurring.

In last words but certainly not least if considered enduring assault/bicycle accident then remember every minute counts due time limitation laws hence head over “Find my Case Worth” button below analyze claim capacity with experts at Carlson Bier walnut desk together navigate path towards comprehensive recovery beyond settling just bills achieving justice will be our mutual goal.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Springfield Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Springfield

Areas of Practice in Springfield

Bike Collisions

Expert in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Damages

Offering professional legal support for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Medical Incompetence

Providing dedicated legal services for victims affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Responsibility

Managing cases involving dangerous products, extending skilled legal assistance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Tumble Accidents

Skilled in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking justice for their harm.

Newborn Damages

Providing legal help for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Mishaps: Devoted to supporting patients of car accidents gain reasonable settlement for wounds and impairment.

Scooter Mishaps

Committed to providing legal services for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Big Rig Accident

Delivering expert legal assistance for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for injuries.

Building Site Crashes

Concentrated on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Brain Damages

Expert in providing compassionate legal representation for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at managing cases for clients who have suffered injuries from dog bites or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Committed to legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unfair Loss

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and professional legal representation to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Injury

Specializing in assisting victims with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal guidance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer