...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Springfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When confronting the distressing ordeal of a dog bite injury in Springfield, it is crucial to have skilled legal representation. Carlson Bier distinguishes itself as the region’s foremost authority in dog bite injuries law. Our unparalleled proficiency stems from our substantial experience dealing with numerous such cases and our relentless commitment to securing justice for victims. We diligently investigate each case, employing comprehensive knowledge of Illinois’ complex legislation on this matter. Moreover, we are particularly adept at navigating insurance claims intricacies following a canine attack incident – ensuring you receive deserving compensation without unnecessary delays or resistance. Undeniably ahead of other personal Injury lawyer firms owing to their incessant victory records; they vest every resource into preparing ironclad litigations regardless of whether the settlement happens out-of-court or before a jury trial takes place—making Carlson Bier an unbeaten champion when seeking robust legal counsel amidst painful aftermaths resultant from unforeseen Dog Bite Injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Springfield Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are passionate about assisting individuals who have been unfortunate victims of dog bite incidents. We understand the trauma and unpredictability associated with such experiences; it’s not just the physical wounds that harm an individual – psychological distress can be another major factor to grapple with. That’s why our dedicated personal injury attorneys offer their comprehensive expertise in the field to those negatively affected by dog bites.

The state of Illinois protects its citizens vehemently under the Animal Control Act, which holds a pet owner liable if his or her animal injures someone without provocation. This means that if you suffer from a dog bite in Illinois, you do not need to prove any negligence on part of the owner – only that you were conducting yourself peacefully and did not provoke the animal.

Many myths regarding dog bite incidents circulate around us, so let’s clear out some misconceptions:

• Not all dogs are prone: Any breed can potentially cause harm given specific circumstances.

• Provocation doesn’t only mean teasing: Even unintentional actions can be counted as provocations; for example, stepping on a tail accidentally.

• Pet owners are always responsible: Unless there was provocation or trespassing involved, pet owners are held accountable for injuries caused by their animals.

Beyond these misconceived beliefs, what could come across as surprising is the magnitude of damage a seemingly harmless incident like dog bite can inflict:

• Severe laceration causing permanent scarring or disfigurement.

• Puncture wounds leading to infections such as rabies and tetanus.

• Permanent nerve damage affecting hand and arm movements may also occur in severe cases.

• Psychological trauma including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), fear or anxiety around animals.

Being well aware of these facts makes it easier to comprehend why securing adequate legal representation following a dog bite incident is paramount. At Carlson Bier, our depth-of-knowledge coupled with unflinching commitment serves clients well as we seek justice for the wronged individual. We extend assistance ranging from navigating complex paperwork, dealing with uncooperative insurance companies to ensuring your medical costs are covered completely.

Our competent personal injury attorneys firmly believe in keeping the client’s best interest as their primary focus; offering unparalleled counsel and support at every step of the legal proceedings. We strive hard to ensure that our clients get rightful compensation not only for their immediate medical bills but also for any long-term therapy or counseling they might require due to such traumatic experiences.

Here at Carlson Bier, it is our ultimate goal to ensure that you receive everything entitled towards recovery post a harrowing incident like a dog bite. It doesn’t matter whether you suffered minor injuries or faced severe physical and emotional trauma – our team will always fight tooth and nail to bring you justice while securing maximum compensation possible under Illinois Law.

We understand how challenging times can deter even the most resilient individuals and therefore, we are committed to standing beside our clients in solidarity every step of the way while ensuring an optimal outcome. So if you or someone near and dear has been afflicted by a dog bite incident, don’t handle this trying time alone – let us help you obtain deserved compensation while safeguarding your rights.

In your path towards seeking justice, understanding what your case is worth truly matters which is why we encourage taking prompt action. For detailed insights catered specifically around your situation, take advantage of our free initial consultation today by clicking on the button below. Know what’s rightfully yours because when it comes down to protecting individuals dealing with something life-changing like dog bite incidents – Attorney Carlson Bier excels above all else!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Springfield Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Springfield

Areas of Practice in Springfield

Cycling Collisions

Specializing in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Flame Damages

Extending professional legal services for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Physician Negligence

Offering professional legal support for victims affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Liability

Taking on cases involving faulty products, delivering professional legal guidance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Neglect

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip & Fall Injuries

Adept in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking recovery for their suffering.

Newborn Traumas

Delivering legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Accidents: Committed to guiding victims of car accidents get reasonable payout for harms and destruction.

Bike Incidents

Specializing in providing legal support for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Trucking Collision

Extending expert legal assistance for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for losses.

Construction Site Collisions

Committed to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Traumas

Expert in extending expert legal assistance for victims suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Injuries

Expertise in addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Expert in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Demise

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and experienced legal representation to ensure justice.

Spine Harm

Expert in assisting individuals with paralysis, offering compassionate legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​