...

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Stanford

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to Slip And Fall Accidents, ensuring you have expert legal representation is of utmost importance. Therefore, Carlson Bier stands as your best consideration. We are an Illinois-based law firm specializing in personal injury cases with considerable experience and success in Slip And Fall claims. Our dedicated attorneys will tirelessly work for you, striving to help secure the settlement that rightly compensates for your loss and sufferings. From evidentiary gathering to strategic negotiation or aggressive courtroom representation if needed, our comprehensive approach often benefits our clients even when complex circumstances arise during the case proceedings. We pride ourselves on getting the results that make a difference and upholding the rights of those affected by such unfortunate incidents—very much like those arising from calamities similar to Slip And Fall scenarios which might have occurred in various situations across cities, just like Stanford’s happenstances where serious outcomes aren’t uncommon at all . Trust Carlson Bier: we’re committed not just to excellent service—but justice too.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Stanford Illinois

Slip and Fall accidents, a common torrent in the realm of personal Injury law, encompass situations where an individual falls on another person’s property due to unsafe conditions. Carlson Bier, a seasoned Illinois-based personal injury attorney group, has distinguished itself for championing victims of these disconcerting incidents. We deeply understand that the aftermath of such an accident can be daunting and confusing, hence why we have taken upon ourselves to provide easy-to-undersstand educational content on Slip and Fall Accidents.

When individuals slip or trip and fall due to hazardous conditions negligently left unattended by a property owner -be it wet floors without warning signs or uneven surfaces-, they stand eligible under Illinois law to seek compensation for incurred injuries. A successful case hinges on proving negligence on the part of the property owner, meaning they either knew about the hazard but did nothing or that they should have reasonably known about its existence. This criterion often presents considerable challenges which necessitate professional legal intervention from veteran attorneys like those at Carlson Bier.

Negotiating this slippery slope requires comprehensive understanding of key considerations around Slip and Fall cases:

• Timeframe: Illinois law stipulates a two-year timeframe within which one must file a claim after experiencing a Slip and Fall accident.

• Liability: The burden lies with you (the victim) to prove that your fall resulted directly from existing hazards that went negligently attended by the property owner.

• Damages: When claiming damages, ensure monies asked not only cover immediate medical expenses but also cater for future treatments related to suffered injuries.

Navigating through these elements undeniably seems complex – undoubtedly so when grappling simultaneously with the trauma associated with these unforgiving incidents—coupled with rising medical expenses and potential lost wages due to time away from work. Now more than ever before do you need dedicated advocates tirelessly working towards achieving justice for you.

At Carlson Bier, we take immense pride in our commitment towards shielding Illinois families from the detrimental aftermath of Slip and Fall accidents. We meticulously untangle every complexity surrounding these cases, skillfully proving negligence on the property owner’s side while concurrently securing a comprehensive claim for damages suffered. By leveraging our extensive experience and deep knowledge of state laws, we have expertly guided countless clients towards achieving rightful outcomes in their personal injury cases.

It is against this backdrop that we are inviting you to become part of our distinguished clientele base. The value proposition presented by Carlson Bier as your prospective advocate extends beyond merely handling your case but also providing continued guidance and support throughout the tumultuous process. We believe every victim deserves justice—hence why we dedicate ourselves to provide profound expertise coupled with utmost compassion throughout your journey towards recovery.

The depth of our commitment shines through in our no-win-no-fee approach, meaning that unless we recover compensation for you, you owe us nothing—a testament indeed to our confidence in delivering results for all clients each time without fail.

Are you grappling with immense uncertainties following a Slip and Fall Accident? Is upholding your rights under these circumstances seeming more complex than ever before? Allow Carlson Bier to come on board and steer your course towards deserved justice and commiserate compensation reflective of incurred damages.

Do not let another day pass under the dark clouds cast by your slip or fall accident. Clarity beckons when professional hands guide your path—it beckons right at Carlson Bier! Take action today: check below—the opportunity awaits for you to discern exactly how much your case could be worth if championed by none other than us, seasoned attorneys dedicated to serving Illinois families like yours with unenviable distinction.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Stanford Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Stanford

Areas of Practice in Stanford

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Proficient in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or risky conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving specialist legal help for people of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Healthcare Misconduct

Providing experienced legal representation for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Responsibility

Taking on cases involving problematic products, providing professional legal assistance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Abuse

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Fall Mishaps

Specialist in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking redress for their injuries.

Infant Injuries

Delivering legal support for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Collisions

Incidents: Devoted to supporting sufferers of car accidents gain reasonable compensation for hurts and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Truck Collision

Offering specialist legal advice for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for damages.

Construction Site Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Neurological Impairments

Focused on ensuring expert legal assistance for individuals suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Injuries

Proficient in addressing cases for clients who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Crashes

Focused on legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Death

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and skilled legal services to ensure justice.

Backbone Impairment

Committed to supporting victims with spine impairments, offering expert legal guidance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer