Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Stockton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When encountering a slip and fall accident, ensuring you have knowledgeable legal representation is critical. Choosing the Carlson Bier attorney team ensures your case will be backed by skilled professionals specializing in this arena. With their extensive experience with Slip And Fall Accidents and unwavering commitment to achieving the best outcome for clients, they take each case personally. Whether it’s navigating complicated liability laws or pursuing fair compensation for your injuries, every step of the process is handled meticulously and effectively. Their thorough investigation procedures identify all negligent parties contributing to an accident while also establishing clear liability evidence crucial in such cases. Carlson Bier’s vast understanding of how insurance companies operate empowers them during negotiations aiming at securing just settlements without unnecessary delays or denials. The comprehensive lawsuit service provided easily separates them from others in this practice area as they truly dedicate themselves towards getting victims their rightful dues when tragedy strikes due to someone else’s negligence relating to Slip And Fall Accidents.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Stockton Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that slip and fall accidents are among the most common causes of severe injury. This understanding allows us to effectively serve clients throughout Illinois who have been injured in such mishaps. Our expertise is geared towards ensuring that our clients receive fair compensation for their injuries.

Slip and fall accidents can occur anywhere — homes, businesses, public spaces— virtually anywhere one steps foot has the potential for harmful falls. Liability often rests on whether an owner or occupier of property was negligent in maintaining it— something we specialize in proving.

Slip and fall cases come under premises liability law which hinges on two basic elements: a dangerous condition existed on someone else’s property leading to harm and the property owner negligently failed at their duty to maintain safe conditions. Determining liability relies heavily on these aspects:

– How and when did the incident occur?

– Was there a reasonable justification for the presence of the hazard?

– Did the owner know about this hazard beforehand?

At Carlson Bier, we meticulously analyze these factors when examining your case.

Subtleties run rampant with slip-and-fall injuries; they range from minor scratches or humiliation to catastrophic impairment like head trauma or spinal cord damage—often linked with substantial medical expenses, lost earnings capacity, or enduring pain and suffering.

We believe that nobody should bear financial hardship because of another party’s negligence. Henceforth, through competent investigation strategies coupled with legal acumen unique to our team at Carlson Bier, our personal injury attorneys work tirelessly toward securing maximum damages you’re legally entitled to recover.

The primary targets here include compensation related to:

• Present as well as future medical expenses

• Lost wages

• Reduced earning ability due to sustained injury

• Compensation for mental anguish and physical suffering

Emphasizing particularly upon slip-and-fall incidents primarily arising out of unsafe conditions caused by slippery surfaces, unsound flooring/stairs/carpets/mats, unmarked/undisclosed danger zones, poor lighting provisions among others.

We would also like to address the situation wherein a ‘Comparative Negligence’ rule applies — meaning if an injured person is partially at fault for his/her own injuries, then any compensation amount granted by court possibly gets reduced proportionally. As knowledgeable attorneys in this field, we draft our legal moves considering such scenarios effectively.

Navigating through the complexities of legal framework and intricacies involved can be stressful without professional help. Our dedicated team at Carlson Bier focuses on building persuasive cases that prove negligence on part of the property owner and examines whether all safety standards were complied with or not; thus assisting you in pocketing rightful monetary assistance against your incurred losses.

Personal injury litigation is time-sensitive due to statute limitations set by Illinois law – another reason why it’s prudent to enlist professional help swiftly after any slip-and-fall accident. We prioritize quick action while ensuring thoroughness in building every client’s case.

In conclusion, remember that healing physically and mentally post-accident should be your central concern as someone undergone such distressing experience. Allow us – Carlson Bier—trusted personal injury attorneys throughout Illinois—to shoulder your burden of taking rightful legal course promptly and conscientiously.

Kindly click on the button below to learn about potential worth of your case, thus setting initial block stone towards a prospective fair compensation journey with us. Let’s together pave path towards justice & recovery – because You Matter Most!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Stockton Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Stockton

Areas of Practice in Stockton

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Flame Injuries

Supplying specialist legal help for victims of serious burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Physician Incompetence

Ensuring specialist legal assistance for patients affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Responsibility

Taking on cases involving defective products, extending specialist legal support to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Misconduct

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Fall and Stumble Mishaps

Expert in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking recovery for their losses.

Birth Traumas

Offering legal guidance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Collisions

Crashes: Dedicated to guiding patients of car accidents receive equitable settlement for harms and damages.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Expert in providing legal support for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Big Rig Collision

Delivering experienced legal representation for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just claims for injuries.

Building Site Collisions

Dedicated to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Injuries

Dedicated to ensuring professional legal advice for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Harms

Specialized in addressing cases for people who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Focused on legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Death

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and experienced legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Spine Trauma

Expert in supporting clients with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer