...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Stone Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unwelcome event of a dog bite injury within Stone Park, thoughtfully turn to Carlson Bier. Specialized in personal injury law, and specifically experienced in handling Dog Bite Injuries cases, they bring extensive legal knowledge to your aid paired with resolute compassion for their clients’ predicaments. The aftermath of a dog bite can be emotionally draining and complex from a legal perspective. However, this is where our seasoned attorneys at Carlson Bier step up spotlighting their skillset. They navigate fiercely through the intricacies of Illinois’s specific laws related to such injuries on your behalf while ensuring you receive due compensation promptly and justly owed for medical expenses or any ensuing trauma due to the unfortunate incident. Entrusting Carlson Bier means receiving premier representation not confined by borders but driven by dedication towards client welfare and justice served correctly irrespective of location constraints; conveniently exemplifying region-based precision without an explicit geographic presence necessitated within administrative terminologies – a true partner-centric approach indeed!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Stone Park Illinois

Personal injury cases can take many forms, and one of the less talked about but equally significant is dog bite injuries. At Carlson Bier – your trusted Illinois personal injury attorney group- we have a deep understanding of this field and are highly equipped to support victims in their legal journey for justice. Dog bites may seem minor issues; however, they can result in severe physical trauma, emotional distress, and substantial financial burdens related to medical expenses.

Getting bitten by a dog can be traumatic enough without having to worry about the complicated nuances of personal injury law in Illinois. It’s essential for anyone who has been injured to know that under Illinois statutes, dog owners are liable for damages when their pet bites another person without provocation. This liability applies if the victim was conducting themselves peacefully and was legally allowed in the place where the biting occurred.

Here at Carlson Bier, our team will guide you through these laws ensuring you get full comprehension about it:

• The rights of an injured individual

• Dog owner responsibilities and liabilities

• Possible defenses a dog owner may raise

• How courts determine whether a dog is “dangerous” or “vicious.”

Our commitment lies with making complex law terms simple enough for everyone to understand while providing robust representation because we care genuinely about getting clients positive results.

When representing any personal injury case including those pertaining to dog bites injuries, our approach remains comprehensive:

– We closely examine all aspects of the incident: Every tiny detail matters when compiling evidence against negligent parties.

– Futuristic view on financial implications: Our evaluation factors in future medical costs linked to long-term physical therapy or cosmetic procedures along with current treatment bills.

– Emotional anguish counts too: We believe mental health is integral as well; hence therapy expenses associated with post-traumatic stress or anxiety disorders aren’t overlooked.

– Negotiating for maximum settlement: With perspicacious negotiation skills derived from vast experience, we aim toward obtaining maximum compensation for clients.

The injuries inflicted by a dog bite can range from minor to severe and may even be life-threatening. It’s crucial to remember that it’s not just the physical damage that counts in such cases but also emotional trauma, not forgetting other complications like infections or diseases that dogs may transmit. This vast array of potential outcomes is precisely why expert legal counsel is critical to ensuring you receive full compensation.

At Carlson Bier, we possess the vital know-how that makes us highly proficient in guiding victims through the complicated maze of personal injury laws regarding dog bites. Our extensive experience serves as a powerful tool which empowers us toward delivering justice for our clients. We are adept at battling insurance companies who tend to undervalue claims, striving tirelessly until we reach an agreement suitable for every client.

Finally, each case has individualistic complexity surrounding it; if you’re grappling with uncertainty about your claim’s worth due to unfamiliarity, worry no more. As your committed Illinois personal injury attorney group, we’ve structured this website resourcefully for you! Feel free to utilize the ‘Claim Worth Button’ below this text. By clicking on it, you will accurately determine how much your particular case is potentially worth— all professionally evaluated without any sort of obligation at your end!

Trust Carlson Bier — where professional service meets compassionate support in helping you achieve rightful justice and peace of mind. Your satisfaction helps us affirm our commitment — making law simple & understandable while crafting robust representation!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Stone Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Stone Park

Areas of Practice in Stone Park

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Proficient in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Scald Burns

Providing specialist legal advice for victims of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Physician Negligence

Providing specialist legal services for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Responsibility

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, providing specialist legal guidance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Senior Mistreatment

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Fall Occurrences

Professional in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking recovery for their injuries.

Childbirth Damages

Delivering legal assistance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Mishaps

Mishaps: Devoted to assisting sufferers of car accidents get just compensation for hurts and destruction.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Committed to providing legal services for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Trucking Incident

Offering experienced legal advice for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Dedicated to advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Brain Traumas

Focused on extending professional legal services for patients suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Expertise in managing cases for persons who have suffered harms from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Death

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and professional legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Neural Injury

Committed to defending persons with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​