Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Stonington

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re grappling with the aftermath of a dog bite incident in Stonington, consider enlisting Carlton Bier’s unmatched expertise. Accredited and revered in Illinois for our exceptional representation within dog bite injury litigation, we bring an unparalleled understanding of nuances to every case. Our commitment is about delivering justice, one client at a time. For victims of canine attacks residing or visiting Stonington who need proficient counsel regarding their rights under state laws, Carlson Bier has consistently proven its capacity by achieving successful settlements and obtaining just compensation for pain endured physically and emotionally. Dog bites can present severe short-term complications as well as long-lasting trauma, thereby necessitating the involvement of competent professionals like us who factor such intricacies into suitable legal recourse measures—ensuring clients get what they rightfully deserve while they focus on recovery from distressing circumstances brought on by unpredictable encounters with dogs.This steadfast dedication towards your well-being makes Carlson Bier your optimal choice amongst personal injury attorneys focusing on dog bite cases.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Stonington Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your safety and welfare are our utmost concerns. We urge you to comprehend the severity of dog bites injuries as it forms a significant part of personal injury cases. Understanding the potential hazards is essential, especially given that the Man’s Best Friend can sometimes turn hostile and be the cause of an uninvited incident leading to physical and emotional pain.

Dog bite injuries vary from simple puncture wounds to severe tissue damage, contributing to dangerous lifelong effects if not addressed promptly. Dog attacks can lead to lasting scars both physically and emotionally generating fear reactions toward dogs in general affect one’s ability to perform everyday tasks. The details about these injuries shed light on their seriousness:

– Puncture Wounds: Dogs have sharp teeth that can pierce through human skin causing painful wounds. These wounds may look small but run deep increasing risk for infection.

– Crush Injuries: Large breed dogs exert enough pressure when they bite which can result in crushed bones.

– Disfigurement: Attacks on visible areas such as face or arms may result in permanent scarring or disfigurement.

– Disease Transmission: A less known fact is that dogs’ mouths contain bacteria that can lead to infections and diseases like tetanus or rabies.

– Psychological trauma: Victims often endure flashbacks, night terrors or generalized anxiety following such incidents.

It’s crucial here based on Illinois law, Carlson Bier operates within its registered premises only; thus avoid misrepresentation regarding our location.

In Illinois, specific laws regard dog bites under which victim rights are protected allowing them actionable recourse against liable parties as long as certain conditions are met:

1. The victim must not provoke the animal inducing attack.

2. They must legally be allowed where attack took place without trespassing private property.

3. Sustained actual physical injuries either directly/indirectly due to dog.

If these criteria apply within your scenario then chances increase significantly for claim eligibility. You don’t want to navigate intricate legal pathways alone during such hard times, which calls for experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier.

Bringing a lawsuit over dog bites is a complex process requiring astute understanding of both state and local ordinances. At Carlson Bier we’ve honed our skills in personal injury law including dog bites cases amass years of experience providing paramount representation to victims statewide. We assist gathering relevant evidence needed confirming the liability by cross-verifying witness statements, medical reports, photographic evidence all whilst rigorously negotiating on your behalf with insurance companies ensuring full compensation as per Illinois state laws.

Taking action expediently after incident boosts chances for optimal results facilitating collection of precise evidences and testimonies that tend to fade away with time. So it’s recommended you reach out professional help sooner than later.

Oftentimes, the aftermath of a dog bite brings along added financial burden due to accumulating medical bills and loss of working hours, further straining the recovery process. At Carlson Bier, we believe no one should bear these unnecessary stresses when they can opt for rightful compensation under Illinois law.

Our team recognizes each case differs based on severity and individual circumstances hence devise custom-tailored approach while leaving no stone unturned maximizing potential claims covering all possible compensatory categories i.e., medical expenses, future care costs if ongoing treatment’s required, lost income during recovery period or any potential reduction in future earning capacity due to disfigurement / disability etc

Lawsuits often seem daunting but navigable efficiently when handled correctly; backed by passion driven practice at Carlson Bier pledged towards only securing justice fairly served.

To truly understand what your specific browser is worth implies deciphering multiple factors derived from same details such as degree of injury caused (Is reconstructive surgery involved?), emotional distress endured by victim post-incident(Has counseling been sought?), plus various other determinants impacting final settlement value – an endeavor best entrusted upon experienced hands of Carlson Bier attorneys. So take a moment to click the button below, let our team help you discern what your case may genuinely be worth under Illinois law recognizing degree of compensation entitled for moving towards personal recovery more confidently.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Stonington Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Stonington

Areas of Practice in Stonington

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Proficient in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Injuries

Extending skilled legal services for people of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Medical Misconduct

Offering experienced legal support for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Fault

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, offering specialist legal assistance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Malpractice

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Stumble Accidents

Adept in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking justice for their harm.

Birth Wounds

Extending legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Mishaps: Committed to supporting clients of car accidents obtain equitable compensation for harms and harm.

Scooter Mishaps

Committed to providing representation for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

18-Wheeler Incident

Delivering adept legal assistance for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for damages.

Construction Crashes

Concentrated on advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Traumas

Committed to offering compassionate legal representation for clients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Damages

Skilled in managing cases for people who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Dedicated to legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Wrongful Demise

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and skilled legal support to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Damage

Committed to defending patients with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer