Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Streamwood

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the immediate aftermath of a pedestrian accident, securing representation from skilled lawyers often becomes essential. Among numerous law firms, Carlson Bier stands as a symbol of trust and competency for these victims in Illinois. Having represented several pedestrian accident cases successfully, they are well-versed with the intricacies involved within this niche category of personal injury law. Known for their aggressive advocacy, deep understanding of local legal requirements and high success rate in settlements, Carlson Bier’s attorneys ensure comprehensive support to victims during challenging times. In addition to adeptly navigating through tricky insurance claim processes or litigating aggressively if needed, their meticulous approach includes educating clients about each step taken toward compensating them duly for loss incurred due to an unfortunate incident. When deciding upon whom you should entrust your case’s responsibility with following a potentially life-altering experience such as this one; count on the expertise and professional diligence that remains synonymous with Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Streamwood Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted Illinois-based personal injury attorneys absolutely dedicated to advocating for the rights of those unjustly injured in pedestrian accidents. Our legal expertise, entrenched in Illinois law, is drawn from years of experience managing intricate claims like yours. We not only hold the liable party accountable but also ardently strategize on procuring optimum compensation for you.

Pedestrian accidents have far-reaching consequences, often leading to severe injuries and, sadly in some instances, loss of life. Victims are frequently faced with heavy medical bills, extended recovery periods, lost wages due to time off work and considerable emotional trauma. Happening understandably without any forewarning, these situations can leave victims feeling vulnerable and overwhelmed.

At Carlson Bier, we stand at the forefront supporting victims through their recovery journey by providing unmatched guidance about legal pathways that offer redress. Widely known state-wide as a steadfast beacon during tumultuous times arising from pedestrian accidents; our competence extends from understanding obfuscated laws to consulting you through filing claims.

Key aspects we address include:

• Identifying responsible parties – From negligent drivers to city council entities who failed maintaining safe sidewalks or traffic lights.

• Gathering proof – Acquiring robust evidence such as surveillance footage or eyewitness testimonies that reinforce your claim.

• Calculating accurate settlement amounts – Factoring all current and future expenses tied up with your injury.

• Dealing with insurance companies – Ensuring rightful indemnities while preventing manipulation or undercutting of your claim’s value.

For most people navigating Illinois’s complex structure of personal injury law is daunting especially when battling physical damage caused by another person’s irresponsibility can be stressful enough! At Carlson Bier we streamline this process for you. Backed by extensive litigation prowess and an unwavering commitment towards securing justice for our clients; every case is treated with undivided attention until its resolution.

Our team invests countless hours meticulously analyzing the facts surrounding your accident circumstances so we can construct a formidable case on your behalf. Renowned for our staunch negotiating skills, we are unwavering in our pursuit of maximum compensation that wholly addresses the range of physical, emotional and financial impact you’ve had to endure.

Under Illinois law, the legal timeline or statute of limitations for lodging personal injury lawsuits stands at two years from the date of the accident. It’s crucial not to miss this deadline as failure to file within this timeframe results in forfeiting your right to seek damages altogether. We aggressively work around this timeline guaranteeing all necessary procedures are promptly and correctly executed within these laws.

It’s imperative to understand that pedestrian accidents vary greatly in nature thus impacting litigation proceedings accordingly. This is why having a seasoned team like Carlson Bier by your side who recognizes these nuances can make the difference between winning or losing a case! Our unyielding dedication towards fighting for victims rights assures us facing any challenge head-on with an unrivaled zeal matched only by our clients’ resilience!

Victims’ rights are central to every step taken here at Carlson Bier where passionate advocacy meets comprehensive legal solution. If you have been injured due to someone else’s negligence don’t bear the burden alone! Trust in our consummate legal representation and let us fiercely champion your course backed by unwavering support allowing you recuperate with ease.

We urge you not just read but take meaningful action now – Connect with Carlson Bier; because every second matters when it comes to rectifying unjust personal injuries! Don’t be left wondering about potential outcomes or hypothetical situations when real professional advice is merely a click away.

Inform yourself further regarding Colorado’s specific traffic laws pertinent directly affecting pedestrian accidents and gain deeper insights into how well-crafted personalized representation can essentially define your road towards equitable recovery! Click on the button below now – find out precisely what your case is worth accompanied by ethical guidance rooted purely within Illinois law.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Streamwood Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Streamwood

Areas of Practice in Streamwood

Bicycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Scald Burns

Providing expert legal support for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Healthcare Misconduct

Providing specialist legal advice for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Liability

Handling cases involving faulty products, offering expert legal help to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Neglect

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip & Fall Occurrences

Specialist in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking redress for their damages.

Infant Injuries

Providing legal guidance for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Crashes: Committed to supporting clients of car accidents secure appropriate settlement for hurts and harm.

Bike Accidents

Focused on providing legal services for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

18-Wheeler Accident

Extending experienced legal assistance for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Concentrated on defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Neurological Damages

Focused on delivering specialized legal assistance for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Damages

Proficient in tackling cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Expert in legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unjust Demise

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and expert legal representation to ensure restitution.

Neural Damage

Dedicated to defending clients with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer