Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Streator

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Victims of dog bite injuries deserve a fierce advocate in their corner, and Carlson Bier is prepared to be exactly that. As masters in Illinois personal injury law, they understand the nuances involved and are committed to achieving fair settlements for clients suffering from such traumatic experiences. The stature of Carlson Bier as a qualified representative for dog bite cases arises from their result-oriented approach; this encompasses reviewing case details judiciously while ardently seeking maximum compensation. Navigating insurance processes requires competent assistance; with extensive experience in negotiating difficult claims, integrity defines all interactions at this esteemed firm – offering genuine support when it’s most needed by victims of dog attacks. Their dedication caters specifically toward securing justice for individuals bearing physical scars or psychological traumas due to unforeseen events involving dogs’ aggressive behavior within Streator’s environs. Amidst rising concerns over canine-induced incidents, Carlson Bier stands ready: your trusted partner advocating tirelessly on behalf of every client wrongfully subjected to such harrowing circumstances – bridging the gap between pain and justice.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Streator Illinois

Established and reputable within the legal field, Carlson Bier is a trusted Personal Injury Attorney Group based in Illinois. Renowned for our commitment to justice and extensive expertise in personal injury law, we maintain an unwavering dedication to defending the rights of individuals who have fallen victim to circumstances outside their control.

One area of personal injury that we place significant value on explaining its intricacies pertains to Dog Bite Injuries. An unfortunate reality in society today is the occurrence of canine attacks causing severe physical harm and emotional trauma. Despite being deemed “man’s best friend,” some dogs can cause catastrophic injuries under certain circumstances.

Dog bite injuries are not only about physical agony but extend to exorbitant medical costs, psychological stress, infections caused by bite wounds, and potential future surgical procedures. Victims could face life-altering consequences which are daunting prospects requiring immediate legal attention.

For those unfamiliar with this aspect of personal injury law, it’s crucial to understand that states like Illinois apply ‘Strict Liability’ when dealing with dog bite cases. The owner can be held legally responsible if their dog causes bodily harm or injures someone without provocation. No matter whether the incident occurred at public places or private properties, as long as victims were there legally – they’re entitled to exercise their right for compensation claim.

Few key details worth keeping in mind regarding Dog Bite Cases include:

• Strict liability rule applies even if this incident is a first-time occurrence.

• Negligence per se doesn’t need proof; violation rules such as leash laws will hold owners accountable.

• The statute of Limitation grants injured parties two years from the date of incidence to file a lawsuit.

• It’s disregarded that prior knowledge was available regarding dog’s vicious propensities.

We at Carlson Bier comprehend each case deeply from the perspective of Illinois state laws ensuring maximum recovery against damages incurred due to ignorant pet-owner negligence.

Our litigation strategy involves comprehensive investigation protocols, expert testimonial consultations, medical expense assessments, and an aggressive negotiation approach. With a proven track record under our belt, we strive to achieve justice for every victim by meticulously adhering to due process and professional standards.

Having a specialized attorney like us can make all the difference in winning your dog bite injury case. Carlson Bier stands right beside you to lessen your burden during these trying times. If you or anyone you know has been subject of such predicament; facing enormous bills and trauma – do not hesitate to reach out.

Don’t let the aftermath of such unforeseen tragedies weigh heavily upon your future well-being! Choose Carlson Bier, where each client’s best interest is at heart. The journey towards recovery might seem formidable but with us by your side – it becomes reachable.

As specialists in personal injury law who are experienced in tackling a whole spectrum of cases including dog bites: We faithfully advocate for justice as per the jurisdiction of Illinois laws ensuring victims receive fair compensation that covers damage extent.

With us representing you in the fight against negligent pet-owners and their insurance companies, rest assured that maximum returns on lawsuits are pursued concentrating on recovery aspects like medical costs, mental anguish and overall lifestyle consequences inflicted due to events outside one’s control.

Our website showcases plethora of success stories serving as testaments emphasizing our proficiency within this legal field along with demonstrating the profound impact held upon those cases handled diligently by dedicated partners from beginning till end.

Patiently answer all queries demonstrating how various factors collectively influence lawsuit results while staying realistic concerning potentials outcomes – everything is clarified since at Carlson Bier, transparency remains paramount importance amidst everything done.. Click the button below now with confidence knowing that seeking help from an established firm as ours would indeed turn things around giving them better shape further brightening up prospects looking so grim presently…

Find out what its actual worth could be when discussed in-depth together! Click below now and start unraveling truth behind actual amounts that your case’s worth! Allow us, Carlson Bier, your trusted legal partner, to help you navigate these challenging times.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Streator Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Streator

Areas of Practice in Streator

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Burn Burns

Extending adept legal services for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Physician Carelessness

Offering professional legal representation for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Accountability

Handling cases involving faulty products, supplying skilled legal services to victims affected by harmful products.

Elder Neglect

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Tumble Incidents

Skilled in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking justice for their losses.

Infant Traumas

Providing legal aid for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Accidents: Committed to assisting clients of car accidents gain equitable settlement for damages and harm.

Scooter Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal support for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

18-Wheeler Collision

Providing experienced legal assistance for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for harms.

Building Incidents

Dedicated to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Neurological Traumas

Committed to offering specialized legal services for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Harms

Specialized in dealing with cases for people who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Fatality

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and adept legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Damage

Dedicated to assisting individuals with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal representation to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer