FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Bicycle Accidents in Stronghurst

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Have you or a loved one been involved in a bicycle accident in Stronghurst? Carlson Bier is highly experienced in handling such cases and ensuring the best possible outcome. Our formidable team of bicycle accident attorneys understands Illinois’s complex cycling laws, providing expertise grounded in thorough preparation and aggressive representation. We empathize with the challenging situation faced by our clients post-accident – unexpected medical expenses, pain, perhaps even job loss. Thus, we fervently advocate for your rights to secure maximum compensation. Unlike many firms that may settle quickly for less compensation to expedite closure, Carlson Bier meticulously reviews each case paying close attention to detail which has consistently resulted in favorable outcomes whether it be through settlement or trial verdicts. What sets us apart is not just our legal prowess but also our commitment towards standing with you every step of the way – from preliminary consultation until resolution without ever having false expectations on physical presence because professionalism transcends geography. Trust your Bicycle Accident case with Carlson Bier; rest assured knowing you are teeing up for success!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Stronghurst Illinois

Bicycle accidents often go unreported but have substantial and lasting negative effects on the victims. Understanding your rights and pursuing a legal course of action can be overwhelming without professional guidance. With our extensive experience in personal injury cases, Carlson Bier endeavors to empower clients with knowledge about bicycle accidents and how best to navigate their aftermath.

In Illinois, cyclists are granted equal rights as motorists by law, meaning that should an accident occur between a car and a bicycle, the cyclist is entitled to compensation if negligence on part of the motorist is established. However, it’s important to remember each case is unique; several factors play into deciding its outcome such as evidential requirements.

• Investigation: Gather relevant information immediately following the incident – details of people involved or witnessing it, pictures or video at the scene if possible.

• Medical Attention: Receiving prompt medical help solidifies physical evidence for injuries sustained, vital documentation for any forthcoming litigation.

• Legal Support: Engaging skilled personal injury attorney early ensures preservation of crucial facts while they are clear & vivid.

The nuances in laws related exclusively to bicycle accidents vary from other personal injury cases. For instance, cyclists bear responsibility for adhering guidelines such as riding near curb restricting movement parallelly with roadway traffic unless turning left or avoiding hazardous conditions making conventional rules unsafe—bicycles must also obey all general traffic control signals just like cars.

Compensation determination elaborates wide-ranging categories: Medical Expenses (both past & future ones), Lost Earnings (including loss due capacity deduction), Property Damage/Replacement costs and Pain/Suffering amounts reflect mental distress undergone due to accident after-effects.

No-fault state regulations don’t apply under most biking circumstances here too—you needn’t worry about insurance limits preventing rightful recovery. Establishing comparative culpability indeed decides verdict results closely though; penalties might decrease proportionally based off individual fault contributed during event occurrence.

Potential questions often revolve around time limits applicable for filing such lawsuits. In Illinois, you have 2 years from the accident date for personal injury and 5 years in case of property damage; this is generally feasible unless any exceptions hinder it .

However, with all its intricacies and delicate complexities navigating through bicycle accident litigation can feel daunting without expert guidance. At Carlson Bier, we believe in taking a comprehensive approach to handle every nuance of your case diligently. Our attorneys will conduct an in-depth analysis based on facts collated helping ascertain liability factors & calculating rightful damage claims.

Our ultimate goal at Carlson Bier is to ensure each client not only secures the compensation they deserve but also understands their journey throughout this challenging process—crypto lawsuits aren’t just about adjudication awards; they’re majorly a quest normalization post adversity faced.

If you or someone you care about has been involved in a bicycle accident, don’t wait another moment pondering over available options — time could play a crucial part! We invite you now to navigate below where our easy-to-use tool awaits, ready to estimate potential worth pertaining your legal claim promptly aiding make informed decisions quicker – because fairness mustn’t await.

Please note our presence spans across multiple locations within the state facilitating wider reaches benefitting numerous clientele bases; however ensuring integrity & transparency adherence we affirm that Carlson Bier firm does not maintain any offices within Stronghurst area currently.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Stronghurst Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Stronghurst

Areas of Practice in Stronghurst

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Expert in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Providing adept legal help for victims of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Hospital Carelessness

Ensuring expert legal support for patients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Liability

Managing cases involving faulty products, extending professional legal guidance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Abuse

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Trip Accidents

Skilled in handling trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking restitution for their injuries.

Birth Wounds

Providing legal aid for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Mishaps

Mishaps: Dedicated to guiding patients of car accidents obtain reasonable settlement for damages and destruction.

Motorcycle Crashes

Focused on providing legal assistance for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Truck Incident

Providing experienced legal advice for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for hurts.

Building Site Incidents

Committed to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Head Harms

Expert in offering compassionate legal services for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in tackling cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Committed to legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Wrongful Fatality

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and expert legal services to ensure redress.

Spine Harm

Expert in advocating for victims with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​