...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Stronghurst

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate event of a dog bite injury in Stronghurst, seeking expert legal counsel is crucial. The acclaimed lawyers at Carlson Bier are renowned for their vast knowledge and experience in dog bite litigation. They comprehend the intricacies of Illinois state laws pertaining to such cases, ensuring your rights as a victim remain protected throughout the process. Their unwavering conviction guarantees thorough investigations that verify liability while securing independent medical examination if necessary for optimal claim results. Weighing the physical pain suffered alongside any possible psychological trauma from an animal attack, Carlson Bier goes above and beyond by offering empathetic representation tailored to suffice every requirement pertinent to each individual case they tackle on Dog Bite Injuries matters. With unparalleled success rates attributed to their diligent negotiations or aggressive courtroom presentations when needed, they ascertain recovery of maximum compensation warranted under all relevant statutes with reassurance that you make no payment until your deserved recompense comes through successfully; thereby placing client satisfaction above everything else. Choose Carlson Bier for steadfastness in representation post-dog bite injuries!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Stronghurst Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the life-changing repercussions that often follow a vicious dog bite. We recognize that Illinois is home to countless pet lovers, but it is also important to acknowledge that incidents of dog bites could not only bring physical harm but have emotional and financial consequences as well. As a respected law firm based in Illinois, our team of dedicated attorneys specialize in personal injury cases, particularly working tirelessly to represent victims of Dog Bite Injuries.

To provide you with a comprehensive understanding about this area of specialization, let’s delve into some critical facets regarding Dog Bite injuries:

• Severity: When considering the severity of dog bite injuries, physical damage ranges from superficial scratches to serious wounds requiring surgical intervention. Moreover, infections such as rabies or tetanus can pose grave risks.

• Psychological impact: Aside from the physical consequences, dog bites can induce psychological trauma including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which may significantly impair quality of life.

• Financial toll: Medical consultations and procedures required after an attack can rack up substantial expenses. This burden extends further when lost earnings during recovery are factored in.

If you or a loved one falls victim to a canine-inflicted injury within Illinois state lines, securing legal representation promptly increases your shot at receiving just compensation for incurred damages. At Carlson Bier we are committed to guiding clients through these terrifying experiences by providing robust legal support every step along the way.

By standing on stringent principles towards ensuring victims’ rights are upheld against owners responsible for their pets’ actions under Illinois law – commonly referred to as the “One Bite Rule” – we strive hard in seeking maximum settlements for impacted lives. Often misunderstood by many individuals who presume they are powerless if it was the animal’s first recorded harmful act- The ‘one bite rule’ simply means that liability isn’t automatically lifted even when it is proven that animals haven’t been aggressive before.

We unrelentingly work towards quickly resolving our clients’ personal injury cases while maintaining a meticulous focus on the comprehensive legalities entailed. Our seasoned team of lawyers commences work by conducting an in-depth evaluation aimed at unravelling all case-specific variables, factors and scenarios, ensuring everything is exhaustively explored to permit a robust claim’s establishment, bolstering sure chances to rightfully win them deserved compensation.

As we consistently strive to stay updated with the latest changes relating to dog bite injury laws in Illinois state legislations, Carlson Bier remains armed with incisive know-how crucial for helping clients ascertain their rightful compensations.

Navigating personal injury claims may be daunting without expert help. That’s why our commitment doesn’t just end in courtrooms; we devote substantial time informing our valued clientele about legal procedures involved plus other components directly pertaining to their unique predicament – it is both our mission and passion!

Furthermore, bearing testimony of our unwavering dedication towards client satisfaction- We operate strictly based on CONTINGENCY FEES: meaning that you don’t pay us until we secure your compensation!

Are you curious about how much your Dog Bite Injury case could potentially recoup? Don’t let lingering worries cloud your judgment. Allow justice to take its course. The first vital step lies right at your fingertips – By clicking the button below. Let’s explore what due recompense stands owing towards resolving this regrettable chapter of life swiftly and smoothly within Illinois law jurisdictions in light of sound counsel from Carlson Bier- Your committed partner through tough times!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Stronghurst Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Stronghurst

Areas of Practice in Stronghurst

Bicycle Accidents

Expert in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Flame Burns

Offering expert legal advice for victims of major burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Hospital Negligence

Extending dedicated legal support for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Fault

Managing cases involving problematic products, supplying expert legal assistance to victims affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Abuse

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip and Slip Accidents

Specialist in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking compensation for their harm.

Birth Traumas

Delivering legal aid for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Incidents: Focused on assisting clients of car accidents receive equitable compensation for injuries and destruction.

Bike Accidents

Expert in providing legal services for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Semi Collision

Ensuring specialist legal assistance for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for harms.

Building Collisions

Committed to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Head Damages

Dedicated to delivering dedicated legal support for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Traumas

Skilled in handling cases for victims who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Specializing in legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Death

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and professional legal support to ensure fairness.

Spine Impairment

Expert in advocating for persons with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​