FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Sullivan

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with daunting spinal cord injuries, it’s imperative to have robust legal representation. Carlson Bier excels in effectively handling these complex cases. Their extensive experience and proven track record make them a leading option for those seeking justice in Sullivan after being dealt an unfortunate hand. This topnotch law firm has made significant strides by successfully championing people who’ve suffered from devastating spinal cord injuries, ensuring they receive the compensation they are entitled to under Illinois law; this includes medical costs, lost wages, and pain & suffering expenses.

The attorneys at Carlson Bier diligently stand up against insurance companies refusing fair settlement offers or denying claims altogether. They comprehend how vital it is for you to have your rights protected during these challenging times. By choosing the distinguished team at Carlson Bier as your dedicated advocates throughout this journey of getting back on your feet post injury, any worries regarding legal matters can be put aside so that you can concentrate earnestly on recovery.

If duty calls requiring a meticulous lawyer for Spinal Cord Injuries within Sullivan – Simply Consider: Who better than Carlson Bier? Trust their reputation speaks volume itself!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Sullivan Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that living with a Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) can be life-altering and traumatizing. Our dedicated team of personal injury attorneys is committed to helping victims get through these challenges by providing expert legal representation. We endeavor to secure the highest level of compensation possible for our clients based in Illinois who have sustained such injuries.

Spinal cord injuries are often substantial, resulting in either complete or incomplete damage. Complete damage means there has been total loss of sensory and motor function below the injury point whereas an incomplete injury would denote some functional preservation below the affected area. This could manifest as limited mobility or slight sensation.

The most common causes of spinal cord injuries are motor vehicle accidents, falls, acts of violence like gunshot wounds, sports injuries, diseases like cancer and polio, and surgical procedures going wrong. Essentially any substantial blow to the spine can lead to a SCI, creating a cascade effect which may result in paralysis and other significant health issues.

What differentiates every spinal cord injury from one another is their location on the spine and their severity – they are paramount factors when determining how it will affect one’s lifestyle and what kind of treatment will be required. Injuries at different vertebral levels produce varying results: Cervical Vertebrae (C1-C7) injuries usually cause loss of function in chest muscles, arms or legs; Thoracic Vertebrae (T1–12) injuries detrimentally impact a person’s physical balance and possibly even control over bladder; Lumbar Sacral Vertebrae (L1-L5) & Coccygeal Vertebrae injures more likely restrict mobility related to hips and legs along with potentially affecting sexual functions.

It’s important to remember that early intervention after sustaining an SCI gives higher chances of recovery however long-term treatment plans should include physical therapy or occupational therapy – among other interventions aimed at improving quality-of-life outcomes post-SCI.

Financial implications arising from SCIs can be colossal due to constant medical care, treatment expenses and loss of revenue. A personal injury claim pursued effectively with an experienced law firm like Carlson Bier could contribute significantly in covering these costs.

Our legal team is dedicated to ensuring that every client obtains fair compensation for the pain and suffering, loss of earnings, medical transportation charges, rehabilitation costs, future care needs and more. We carefully assess each case based on its unique circumstances to provide a personalized legal strategy designed to ensure success.

Navigating through the complex litigation system while dealing with a traumatic injury can undoubtedly be overwhelming which is why we believe in taking over this burden so you can primarily focus on your recovery journey. Our lawyers are not only skilled professionals but they are compassionate individuals who connect deeply with clients’ situations.

At Carlson Bier, our experience has taught us that pursuing an SCI compensation claim requires not just proven facts showing negligence or liability leading to the injury, but also demonstrating how profoundly it has changed one’s life. We thus ensure establishing both aspects formidably during the court proceedings by collecting all necessary medical records along relevant evidence backing your stand.

Recovering from a spinal cord injury is an individual’s fight however allowing us, at Carlson Bier to battle for justice alongside you promises unparalleled support and assurance of possible victory against expensive long term suffering caused by someone else’s negligence.

We understand that puffing unknowingly into unwarranted hardships may often leave victims feeling powerless. Hence as a final note towards boosting such silently enduring spirits – do determine what would be the worth of your potential lawsuit? You might just find relief beyond expectations waiting ahead in your path!

Click on the button below right now for discovering what compensatory prospects await! Allow us to light up those dark tunnels flooding helpless despair with our informed advice because at Carlson Bier – we help justice prevail!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Sullivan Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Sullivan

Areas of Practice in Sullivan

Bicycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Burns

Supplying specialist legal services for people of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Physician Malpractice

Ensuring experienced legal representation for victims affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Responsibility

Managing cases involving faulty products, extending adept legal guidance to consumers affected by defective items.

Senior Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Fall Incidents

Professional in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking restitution for their damages.

Childbirth Injuries

Delivering legal help for households affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Accidents

Mishaps: Committed to aiding clients of car accidents get appropriate remuneration for harms and damages.

Scooter Crashes

Committed to providing representation for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Semi Collision

Offering expert legal services for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for injuries.

Building Crashes

Concentrated on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Neurological Impairments

Dedicated to extending professional legal representation for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at dealing with cases for victims who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Accidents

Expert in legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unfair Death

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and adept legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Dedicated to supporting individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​