FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Sycamore

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the disconcerting event of a dog bite injury in Sycamore, Carlson Bier is the first name that comes to mind for cogent and comprehensive legal assistance. With an extensive roster of successful cases, their personal injury lawyers have carved a niche with unrivaled mastery in dealing with dog bite incidents. Through compassionate approach and astute procedural knowledge, they ensure your rights are not compromised against negligent pet owners. Utilizing Illinois law’s intricate understanding, every case at Carlson Bier is aggressively fought for ensuring maximum compensation recovery while you focus on recuperating from such distressful experiences. The distinctive approach at Carlson Bier pivots around tireless dedication coupled with proactive response to enforce accountability and safety standards within our community and beyond. You don’t just acquire legal representation when choosing Carlson Bier- you receive consistent support from experienced professionals fervently committed to fighting unjust circumstances brought by unwarranted dog bites. Carlton Bier stands as your best option where expertise aligns seamlessly with relentless advocacy set yield favorable outcomes in these daunting times!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Sycamore Illinois

In the unfortunate event of a dog bite injury, it is important to understand one’s rights and possible legal courses of action. At Carlson Bier, our dedicated personal injury attorneys based in Illinois possess years of expertise handling various types of personal injury cases of this nature. We implement an aggressive yet ethical approach to protect your interests and provide deserving compensation.

When it comes to dog bites, Illinois employs strict liability under its Animal Control Act. This means that the owner can be held responsible for a dog bite injury even if they had no reason to suspect their dog was dangerous before the incident transpired. Essentially, showing negligence on part of the owner isn’t necessary unlike other states – demonstrating categorically that their dog caused your injuries is primarily what you have to prove.

Some essential things victims need to know are:

• Compensatory Grants: Victims could receive compensation for medical bills related directly to the initial attack as well as future expenses ensuing from scarring or permanent disfigurement.

• Stringent Liability Perspective: The law stipulates holding owners accountable unless they can prove provocation. In instance when minor children provoke a pet unknowingly (for kids below seven), such defenses might not hold ground.

• Free-roaming dogs: If any damage has been inflicted by an unleashed dog off its owner’s property or without being appropriately restrained according to local leash laws, additional damages may also be awarded.

Also noteworthy is the fact that homeowners’ insurance typically covers most canine inflicted harm incidents thus affording plaintiffs reprieve concerning compensatory issues while seeking recourse.

For maximum recovery following a dog bite mishap in Illinois, reaching out promptly for professional advice becomes crucial once immediate medical concerns are addressed. Our team at Carlson Bier expertly navigates through complex nuances offering comprehensive aid with risk assessment, filing comprehensive claims procedures and tenaciously pursuing optimal outcomes during negotiation phases with insurers or legal representation on opposite ends.

Patient understanding is pivotal within our service ethos; thus we commit to explaining the intricate legal aspects and expected proceedings lucidly, helping you strategize accordingly. This transparency coupled with adept negotiation skills significantly enhances the possibility of securing maximum compensation.

Since identifying key elements crucial for a successful lawsuit can be challenging after traumatic incidents, detailed case evaluation becomes our forefront commitment in dealing with dog bite injury cases at Carlson Bier. Our comprehensive forensic approach ensures unearthing all potentially beneficial facets that could substantiate your claim. Moreover, our hands-on experience dealing with insurance adjusters reinforces indemnity awarded while avoiding undue victimization within these challenging processes.

To accentuate this point further, here are a few ways our dedicated team assists you;

• Evaluate initial incident reports and analyze medical documentation

• Assess potential long-term effects resulting from injuries

• Determine fair monetary valuation including pain and suffering

• Leverage years of expertise calculating future medical costs

We operate on a contingency basis meaning that pre-payment isn’t required – fees are charged only when successful outcomes materialize indicating an inherent shared risk benefiting clients directly in their quest for deserved justice.

Navigating through traumatic events can indeed be burdensome but remember, professional aid is just one click away! Reach out to us at Carlson Bier – Illinois’ dependable personal injury attorneys. Take advantage of our no-obligation consultation today by clicking the button below to explore how we could fortify your stand seeking deserving compensation post a dog bite incident. Uncover what your case genuinely might be worth – you have nothing to lose but loads to potentially gain!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Sycamore Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Sycamore

Areas of Practice in Sycamore

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Extending expert legal help for patients of major burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Clinical Malpractice

Delivering dedicated legal advice for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Obligation

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, supplying adept legal assistance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Elder Misconduct

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip & Fall Incidents

Specialist in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking redress for their damages.

Birth Harms

Extending legal assistance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Collisions: Devoted to supporting clients of car accidents gain equitable payout for damages and losses.

Scooter Accidents

Committed to providing legal advice for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Semi Incident

Offering professional legal advice for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for losses.

Construction Accidents

Committed to advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Impairments

Specializing in extending specialized legal assistance for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Harms

Proficient in handling cases for people who have suffered wounds from dog bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unfair Loss

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and skilled legal representation to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Harm

Committed to defending patients with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440