FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Tamaroa

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re faced with the unfortunate aftermath of a dog bite in Tamaroa, finding an expert attorney becomes paramount. That’s where Carlson Bier comes in – renowned for their exceptional track record handling Dog Bite Injury cases throughout Illinois. We understand that each incident carries its own nuances and degree of trauma, requiring an empathetic yet strategic perspective to guide clients toward justice. Expertise is crucial when navigating the complex legal procedures associated with these incidents, and at Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on our comprehensive understanding of Illinois regulations governing dog bite injuries. Our dedicated team ensures your case gets the attention it deserves while fighting relentlessly for rightful compensation ensuring physical as well as emotional healing from such distressing experiences. Selecting us represents not just choosing superior legal representation but also opting for peace-of-mind during this challenging time thanks to our unparalleled dedication towards rectifying adversity affecting innocent victims of canine aggression across Illinois. Trust Carlson Bier – Your optimal choice for managing Dog Bite Injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Tamaroa Illinois

Personal injuries can disrupt lives in unimaginable ways, leaving victims struggling with physical pain, financial burdens, emotional distress, and a grueling pursuit for justice. At the heart of Illinois, our law firm Carlson Bier embodies an unwavering commitment to individuals who have fallen victim to the negligence of others. We take pride in our legal team’s combined expertise and compassion as personal injury attorneys. A critical area where Carlson Bier has enjoyed considerable success is dog bite cases.

Dog bites are not mere trifling accidents that one can simply shrug off – they constitute serious personal injuries which sometimes evoke lifelong trauma. The consequences from these types of injury range from painful scars and long-term therapy to hefty medical bills and lost wages due to recovery downtime. Knowing this harsh reality fuels our relentless drive at Carlson Bier as we strive to ensure those affected by dog bites receive everything they’re entitled to.

In Illinois, “strict liability” rules apply when it comes to dog bite laws. This means that an owner remains liable if their dog attacks or injures someone else—even if precautions were taken or regardless of whether this was the first biting incident. Moreover:

– The injured party does not have to establish negligence on the part of the owner.

– Exceptions exist only when a victim provokes a dog intentionally or where they aren’t legally allowed on the property at the time of attack.

– The law provides flexibility around “dogs”, including animals often mistaken for dogs like wolves or coyotes.

At Carlson Bier, we believe in empowering everyone with comprehensive understanding about their right under such circumstances. In other words, you’re fully protected by law should you fall prey to such an unfortunate event.

This extensive knowledge sets us apart as expert personal injury lawyers who devise winning strategies grounded on facts and relevant laws rather than quick-draw assumptions.

Furthermore:

– We comprehend not every claimant bears sufficient knowledge about documenting wounds properly—a crucial factor while pushing for fair compensation.

– With an eye for detail, we help in gather necessary medical documents and witness testimonies, assembling them in a compelling manner that anchors your claim.

– Our network of healthcare providers ensures victims receive timely and appropriate treatment while also documenting the injuries accurately.

Should the worst occur, do not hesitate to reach out. It is only natural to worry about legal fees when dealing with such crises. However, at Carlson Bier, our operations are designed around contingency models which simply means – no recovery equates to no fees.

Despite the strict liability law, navigating through dog bite cases could prove challenging due to layered complexities involved in personal injury law. The perpetrator may argue provocation or trespassing as their defense or insurance companies might undervalue your claim. These scenarios underscore the need for an expert personal injury attorney who can champion your fight both inside a courtroom and on negotiation tables.

In summary:

– Dog bites aren’t mere accidents; they’re serious incidents bearing long-lasting impacts.

– Illinois’ “strict liability” laws protects victims from dog bite injuries.

– Evidence helps build strong claims; precise documentation of wounds plays a critical role here.

– Legal representation shields you from unfair settlements by insurers or denials based on disputable defenses.

Our goal at Carlson Bier centers around delivering maximum value through resolve and fortitude reflecting in each represented case. Bringing decades of experience into play along with localized expertise proudly rooted within Illinois gives us leverage when it comes to adjusting approaches per situational demands – ensuring nothing stands between justice and our clients.

Remember—you don’t have to endure this journey alone. Click on the button below, let Carlson Bier guide you towards gaining insight into what your well-deserved compensation value may look like because justice shouldn’t just be served—it should be won!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Tamaroa Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Tamaroa

Areas of Practice in Tamaroa

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Scald Injuries

Offering professional legal help for people of serious burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Extending specialist legal services for persons affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Obligation

Taking on cases involving defective products, extending adept legal guidance to consumers affected by defective items.

Geriatric Neglect

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Fall Occurrences

Specialist in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking compensation for their losses.

Newborn Wounds

Supplying legal assistance for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Incidents: Devoted to assisting clients of car accidents secure equitable payout for harms and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Expert in providing legal services for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Big Rig Incident

Offering adept legal services for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for injuries.

Construction Incidents

Concentrated on supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Neurological Harms

Committed to offering compassionate legal representation for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Specialized in handling cases for clients who have suffered harms from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and expert legal services to ensure restitution.

Backbone Trauma

Specializing in defending persons with paralysis, offering specialized legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440