FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Teutopolis

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the aftermath of a dog bite injury, one requires a dedicated and experienced attorney at their corner. Carlson Bier comes to the forefront in these challenging times with high professionalism combined with empathetic handling of cases. Based in Illinois, our law firm’s expertise is predominated by personal injury matters, notably Dog Bite Injuries. We understand that these types of injuries can be both physically debilitating and emotionally distressing; hence we approach each case individually, working to ensure you receive the compensation you deserve for your pain and anguish. With an extensive breadth of practice within Illinois law guidelines on Dog Bite Injuries, including specific aspects relating to Teutopolis residents’ needs – Carlson Bier exhibits unparalleled commitment towards its clients while adhering strictly to legal tenets. Your choice in selecting Carlson Bier means aligning yourself with passionate experts fervently committed to seeking justice for those affected by dog bite tragedies – because your comfort today heralds brighter tomorrows.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Teutopolis Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand dog bite injuries can be deeply traumatizing events that leave physical and emotional scars. Our dedicated team of personal injury attorneys in Illinois stands ready to assist you in obtaining rightful compensation for such misfortunate incidents. Dog bites are a serious public health concern across the country, causing painful injuries, psychological trauma and, in severe cases, even death. These situations warrant legal expertise that’s both compassionate and fierce; that’s where Carlson Bier steps in.

A myriad of laws regulate the ownership and handling of dogs in Illinois. Among them is the Animal Control Act which holds owners liable for unprovoked attacks resulting in injury to people who conduct themselves peaceably. This act also covers instances when individuals have a lawful right to be at the location where the attack took place – including visiting someone else’s property or walking along public pathways or parks.

It’s vital to know your rights and responsibilities following a dog bite incident:

• Understand Your Rights: As a victim, you should receive medical treatment right away. Ensure comprehensive photographs are taken of your injuries as these serve as key evidence during the course of your claim.

• Report The Incident: It is crucial to inform local authorities about the incident promptly – not only for record keeping but it may prevent others from getting hurt by an aggressive pet.

• Identify The Dog & Its Owner: Gather necessary details about the dog involved and its owner including name, contact information, address and relevant insurance coverage.

• Legal Consultation: Reach out to experienced legal counsel like our attorneys at Carlson Bier whose deep understanding of Illinois’ Animal Control Act will aid you throughout this process.

Dog bite claims require supportable proof establishing liability on part of the canine’s owner plus visibility into incurred losses due to one’s injuries such as resulting medical bills, lost wages during recovery periods alongside enduring pain plus suffering that impacts day-to-day living.

Carlson Bier lawyers handle dog-bite injury cases on a contingency fee basis which simply means you won’t incur any upfront charges. Our fees are deducted from the final settlement or court-awarded damages at completion of your case. This provides a risk-free avenue towards justice, leveling the playing field even against large insurance companies that typically defend such claims.

Remember, not all personal injury lawyers carry equal caliber and experience dealing with complex dog bite cases in Illinois. At Carlson Bier, we stand out because of our:

• Deep Experience: We hold decades-long expertise navigating through complex legal terrains surrounding dog bite incidents.

• Track Record: A strong history of successful settlements and trial wins vouch for our aggressive negotiation skills along with courtroom proficiency.

• Compassionate Service: Our team treats every client as a unique individual deserving respect plus dignity while enduring tough consequences following an unimaginable ordeal.

The psychological impact post experiencing a traumatizing event like this can be overwhelming; thus, having expert advocates like us by your side significantly eases burden off during recovery. The love for pets is universal; however when man’s best friend turns into an attacker stuff becomes complicated – but worry no more as we’re here standing ready to help!

If you or someone close to you has become the victim of a dog bite incident in Illinois, reach out to Carlson Bier today. Don’t let worries about affordance stop you as remember we are operating on ‘no win-no fee’ basis thereby letting victims access top-notch legal support irrespective of their financial situation.

Allow us to turn your distressing circumstance into an advantage by establishing a robust claim tailored claiming maximum compensation you deserve – protecting your rights plus interests under Illinois law all throughout these proceedings.

To fully comprehend extent concerning how much your case potentially could be worth, explore below right now! Clicking captures mere seconds of one’s time yet opens doors leading towards paths filled with optimism where justice prevails over adverse circumstances turning these into triumphs serving humanity’s benefit at its core – not merely personal. Don’t delay, your journey towards justice awaits on the other side of that click!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Teutopolis Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Teutopolis

Areas of Practice in Teutopolis

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Flame Wounds

Extending adept legal advice for patients of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Healthcare Carelessness

Delivering professional legal assistance for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Accountability

Managing cases involving faulty products, offering adept legal support to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Senior Misconduct

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Tumble Occurrences

Skilled in managing trip accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking recovery for their suffering.

Birth Injuries

Supplying legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Collisions: Concentrated on supporting clients of car accidents obtain reasonable remuneration for hurts and impairment.

Scooter Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal services for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

18-Wheeler Collision

Delivering specialist legal assistance for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for damages.

Worksite Collisions

Committed to defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Head Impairments

Committed to providing specialized legal advice for clients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Damages

Proficient in handling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Focused on legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unjust Loss

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and adept legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Damage

Committed to defending victims with paralysis, offering specialized legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​