FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Teutopolis

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a spinal cord injury, navigating legal matters can add an overwhelming layer to an already stressful situation. Turning to a professional law firm like Carlson Bier brings reassurance and expertise to your side. A premier name in personal injury litigation across Illinois, specializing specifically in spinal cord injuries, our understanding of such complex cases remains unparalleled. At Carlson Bier, extensive knowledge blended with compassion drives us as we progressively take on each case’s unique challenges and needs. Recognizing that every case hinges on fact-specific issues pertaining to medical consequences and liability questions involved with spinal cord injuries, we provide meticulously crafted legal strategies personally designed for each client’s circumstances – striving towards ensuring the maximum compensation deserved is achieved. Choosing us puts years of experience garnered from successfully arguing countless such cases at your disposal; remember when searching for an advocate after a catastrophic event involving Spinal Cord injury: Choose strength; choose expertise; consider turning towards Carlson Bier Personal Injury Lawyers”-

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Teutopolis Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted Illinois-based group of personal injury attorneys dedicated to serving victims like you. One particular area of our expertise focuses on spinal cord injuries; these are complex and life-changing incidents that can cause immense physical, emotional, and financial strain on the victim and their families.

A spinal cord injury is an acute traumatic event resulting from numerous causes such as motor vehicle accidents, falls, violence, sports-related impacts – even illnesses or certain medical procedures. This devastates one’s life in many forms – everything from pain and suffering to reduced mobility, altered sensation function and potentially a diminished capacity to earn income.

The potential outcomes for those with this kind of injury vary significantly depending upon several key variables: where along the spine the injury occurred (with higher-level injuries generally leading to more severe consequences), whether the damage is partial or complete (completely severing the spinal cord tends to have much greater implications than a partial tear or bruise), and how swiftly effective medical intervention was provided post-injury.

Properly navigating through all these complexities requires extensive legal knowledge coupled with technical medical understanding; fortunately at Carlson Bier we possess both. Our key offerings ticketed specifically towards supporting victims of spinal cord injuries include:

– Guiding clients through medical reporting processes

– Securing expert witness testimonies relevant to your case

– Crafting comprehensive demand packages detailing all losses incurred

– Negotiating assertively with insurance companies on behalf of our clients

Recovering from a spinal cord injury does not only involve healing physically but also financially; by securing damages that help compensate you for all costs associated with your injury. These include medical bills (both present and future), lost wages due to being unable to work, pain & suffering caused by this life-altering incident as well as other related expenses you might incur during recovery process.

It is essential for anyone dealing with a spinal cord injury not just understand these aspects but also how they are interconnected. For example, while an insurance company might initially offer to cover a particular surgical procedure this might not necessarily mean they recognize full extent of your long-term care needs associated with injury.

At Carlson Bier we leave no stone unturned; we understand that each case is unique and tailor our approach accordingly ensuring all aspects are evaluated in-depth facilitating optimal results for our clients. With an impressive track record spanning numerous successful compensation recoveries, testament to our dedicated service and astute professional acumen.

We assure you, nobody will fight harder for you than us; nobility of justice is the courage within us! We encourage you, dear reader if you or someone close has suffered a spinal cord injury due to negligence of another party, take the first step towards protecting your rights today – only by doing so can you ensure that those responsible are held accountable while also securing financial means necessary for recovery.

Remember this key takeaway: A spinal cord injury does not end when immediate crisis resolves. This often sets one off on years-long journey entailing long-term medical care, persistent rehabilitation therapy and recurrent adaptation to new limitations. Surviving this ordeal therefore requires persistence along with strong legal representation; something which we at Carlson Bier promise to deliver with utmost professionalism and dedication.

Ready to seek expert counsel from trusted personal injury attorneys here at Carlson Bier? Click on the button below now – finding out how much your case is worth could be just one simple click away!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Teutopolis Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Teutopolis

Areas of Practice in Teutopolis

Cycling Mishaps

Proficient in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Supplying professional legal advice for individuals of major burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Clinical Carelessness

Extending expert legal services for clients affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Obligation

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, delivering skilled legal support to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Misconduct

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Slip Incidents

Adept in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking redress for their injuries.

Childbirth Harms

Providing legal guidance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Car Crashes

Incidents: Concentrated on helping individuals of car accidents receive fair payout for injuries and harm.

Scooter Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal services for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Big Rig Mishap

Offering professional legal support for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Committed to defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Neurological Damages

Focused on providing expert legal support for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Wounds

Expertise in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Collisions

Focused on legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Loss

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and experienced legal support to ensure compensation.

Neural Damage

Expert in defending persons with vertebral damage, offering expert legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​