Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Texico

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from dog bite injuries can be traumatizing and the legal ramifications complex. That’s where Carlson Bier, your premier choice in personal injury law representation comes into play. Our competence is insurmountable when addressing cases of Dog Bite Injuries, with highly skilled attorneys who possess a vigorous understanding of Illinois laws regarding these particular situations. Ensuring that victims receive rightful compensation for medical bills, emotional distress or lost wages arising from such incidents are our utmost priority. Even though we extend our services diligently to residents of Texico among other areas, it’s crucial to know that we strictly adhere to the professional ethics laid down by the Illinois bar association which forbids false advertisement of physical presence in cities where there’s no actual office presence established by us yet like Texico city currently is not one such location for us now.However,this will not hamper any client attorney relationship building arbitrated by jurisdictional physical boundaries.Nevertheless,this only reiterates commitment towards upkeeping transparency.Elevate your case with Carlson Bier; excellence combined with authenticity at its finest.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Texico Illinois

Understanding your rights and legal options is crucial if you’ve been the unfortunate victim of a dog bite injury. Carlson Bier – a distinguished personal injury law group based in Illinois – has extensive expertise and honed skills in handling such cases, making us the right choice to represent you.

Dog bite injuries are far from trivial; they have physical, emotional, and potentially financial impact on your life. You could be left with deep lacerations, severe infections or debilitating scars that result into permanent impairment or disfigurement. Furthermore, these injuries often induce immense psychological trauma due to their shockingly sudden occurrence.

Illinois holds strict liability laws for dog owners. Here’s what this means:

– Dog owners are legally responsible for any injuries caused by their pets.

– The injured individual does not need to prove that the owner was negligent or aware of the dog’s aggressive tendencies.

– Even if it’s the first time a dog bites someone, its owner would still be held accountable.

This underscores your rightful entitlement to compensation after experiencing such an incident—a fact that many victims remain unaware of until they consult seasoned professionals like Carlson Bier.

Now addressing frequent queries: What can actually be claimed as damages in these situations? We can liaise with you over obtaining recovery costs related to medical expenses incurred during immediate care and ongoing treatments – this includes fees for hospital stays, doctor appointments, surgeries and medications. Additionally, we pursue claims including loss of earnings owing to inability to work during recovery period and even diminished earning capacity if enduring impairments affect future job prospects noticeably.

Moreover, general damages involving pain & suffering resulting from physical wounds plus mental anguish inflicted by episode are included. In extreme cases where evident negligence is involved—like unleashed dogs in public places—the court may award punitive damages as deterrence against recurring incidents.

Compiling necessary evidence is indispensable part of lawsuit success hence:

– Always seek immediate medical assistance post-bite for both health-care & documentation purposes.

– Attempt to identify the dog and its owner: this evidence can be essential when making a claim.

– Gather witness information: statements gathered at the scene of the incident will strengthen your dog bite case.

Here at Carlson Bier, we are committed to supporting victims navigate through intricate legal procedures to obtain just compensation while restoring their lives back on track. We empathetically understand that grappling with distressing aftermath is challenging; hence our relentless endeavor lies in mitigating your burden by efficiently handling all legal aspects.

We believe no individual should be left dealing with such dire outcomes alone especially considering Illinois law protects you comprehensively as a dog attack victim. Our proficient team works diligently assessing minute specifics of your case ensuring you get maximum possible remuneration.

As stalwarts in personal injury law, our extensive experience coupled with deep-rooted understanding in cases pertaining to dog-bite incidents ensures that you would be represented by utmost competence and staunch advocates—making Carlson Bier an invaluable ally for turning tables in seemingly overwhelming situations.

It’s crucial to remember time limitations on filing claims hence it’s important you act swiftly post incidence — allowing us ample time for thorough preparation and discovery resulting into enhanced chances of lawsuit success or fair settlements outside courtrooms as per individual case characteristics.

Your physical, emotional, and financial recovery journey after enduring such trauma deserves expert guidance…we offer exactly that here at Carlson Bier. As final step today—we urge you tap into our wealth of professional personal-injury expertise right now! Simply click on the button below,

Don’t wonder how much your case might potentially fetch; discover precisely what it’s worth instead. Your justice might just be one click away – let us help you successfully embark onto this path towards rightful restitution.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Texico Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Texico

Areas of Practice in Texico

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Focused on legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Burn Injuries

Providing adept legal assistance for patients of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Delivering dedicated legal assistance for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Obligation

Managing cases involving faulty products, offering professional legal support to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Trip Occurrences

Skilled in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking recovery for their harm.

Childbirth Damages

Supplying legal aid for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Crashes

Incidents: Focused on aiding individuals of car accidents secure just settlement for hurts and harm.

Motorcycle Incidents

Expert in providing legal support for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Ensuring specialist legal advice for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for damages.

Worksite Accidents

Concentrated on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Brain Traumas

Dedicated to providing dedicated legal support for clients suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Injuries

Skilled in tackling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Death

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and experienced legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Spine Injury

Focused on advocating for patients with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer