...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Thayer

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a dog bite injury in Thayer, recourse to legal representation from Carlson Bier is advisable for optimal outcomes. As experienced personal injury lawyers, we specialize in cases pertaining to Dog Bite Injuries, guiding victims and families through each step in seeking legal redress. Beyond just physical trauma, such incidents often lead to emotional scars or financial strain due to hefty medical bills and potential loss of income during recovery. The attorneys at Carlson Bier ensure you are not alone amidst these challenges; we represent your rights vigorously while pursuing fair compensation that reflects pain severity and lost earnings incurred due to the incident. Having worked on an array of similar cases across Illinois equips us with requisite knowledge about unique case dynamics related specifically to Dog Bite Injuries; this renders us perfectly poised within your corner during such trying times. Trusting our expertise invariably facilitates smoother navigation through ordeal’s complexities – that’s Carlson Bier assurance you can bank on for Bodily Injury Claims.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Thayer Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your safety is paramount to us. As an esteemed personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we understand the profound impact that dog bite injuries can have on you both psychologically and physically. These abrupt accidents may trigger trauma, inflict pain and suffering, and often results in unforeseen financial expenses for treatment. Often underestimated, dog bite injuries can lead to serious consequences including deep wounds, tenderness or discomfort around the bitten area, infections risking sepsis or tetanus and psychological impairment.

It’s important to note key factors involved in a dog bite injury case:

• Responsibility of the Dog Owner: With everything being equal under stringent Illinois laws, dog owners are held accountable if their pet causes harm even without prior dangerous tendencies displayed by the animal.

• Filing Reports Properly: Victims must file accurate incident reports with concerned local authorities and agencies supporting these instances within a legal time frame prescribed by state regulations.

• Medical Costs Recovery: If proven that an owned dog inflicted harm without provocation on you as an innocent visitor or passerby; then hospital bills incurred will be recoverable from defaulting owners.

• Pain & Suffering Compensation: Beyond medical costs; emotional distress accompanied by physical pain could result into a worthy compensation to address resultant loss of income due to potential disability.

Navigating the legal landscape surrounding dog bite injuries in Illinois might seem daunting which is why at Carlson Bier; we provide expert guidance backed with keen attention to detail during this emotionally charged period.

We’ve handled countless cases of differing complexities related to dog bites with diligence while compassionately addressing concerns and settling any queries our clients might harbor. Our professional team maintains consistent communication ensuring each step taken aligns perfectly towards achieving favourable outcomes for our clients.

Legal proceedings necessitate evidence which could prove challenging especially where multiple dogs were present during attack incidence or there was absence of a witness. In such circumstances – having experts like our attorneys calibrates focus securing maximum compensation while ensuring that victims can seek immediate medical attention.

In Carlson Bier, you’ll gain access to knowledgeable professionals who are versed in Illinois law relating to personal injuries especially those from dog bites. We are adept at interpreting what might seem like dense legal jargon into simple layman’s language for your clear understanding enabling you to concisely determine the course of action that’s in your best interest.

We would love nothing more than to reassure and provide you with invaluable assistance after having suffered adversely due a dog bite injury. The values we uphold reflect on our commitment built upon securing rightful justice coupled by recovery of consequent damages incurred from unforeseen instances such as this poignant moment you’ve had to endure.

Remember, time is of essence when dealing with these cases as Illinois statute limitation period necessitates claims filed within a specific timeframe – usually 2 years post incidence date though there could be exceptions. Quick action affords ample preparation assessing costs incurred including medical bills alongside other expenses facilitating effective representation corroborated by compelling arguments bolstering chances for favourable case outcomes.

We’re confident that through partnership we could steer this seemingly overwhelming process towards delivering promising results making painful experiences a lot more bearable against all odds. The journey towards seeking rightful justice begins here at Carlson Bier; why not make the choice today?

Click on the button below and let’s meet up to assess what your case is worth reflecting our respect for your distress and attentive acknowledgement of illegality inflicted upon you unjustly via uncontrolled pet behaviour.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Thayer Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Thayer

Areas of Practice in Thayer

Bike Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Providing skilled legal help for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Physician Carelessness

Delivering professional legal services for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Liability

Handling cases involving unsafe products, supplying specialist legal assistance to victims affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Neglect

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Fall Mishaps

Specialist in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking redress for their damages.

Infant Traumas

Providing legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Crashes: Devoted to supporting sufferers of car accidents obtain appropriate recompense for injuries and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Committed to providing legal advice for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Semi Mishap

Extending adept legal assistance for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for injuries.

Worksite Incidents

Focused on supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Brain Harms

Expert in offering specialized legal advice for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Traumas

Specialized in addressing cases for people who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unjust Passing

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and skilled legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spine Harm

Focused on assisting persons with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​