FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Thayer

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

As unfortunate as it may sound, pedestrian accidents are an unavoidable reality. In the midst of such challenging times, Carlson Bier serves Thayer residents with dedication and professionalism in dealing with personal injury cases effectively. Our specialized Pedestrian Accident attorneys understand the complexity these matters entail and strive to secure just compensations for our clients’ losses. Committed solely to your service, we navigate through legal loopholes diligently without unsettling your peace during recovery process.

Our track record defines us – as one stands not on hollow claims but on confirmed courtroom victories over monetary reimbursement fights against powerful corporations or individuals. We recognize that each case is unique; therefore, we tailor-make strategies based on detailed accident analysis to ensure our clients receive their rightful due.

In essence, if you unfortunately find yourself tangled in a pedestrian accident scenario within Thayer needing legal counsel and representation par excellence – remember Carlson Bier! We represent strength at its humblest while fighting relentlessly for justice one deserves amid distressing moments following an accident event.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Thayer Illinois

Pedestrian accidents are a significant concern in Illinois, causing numerous fatalities and injuries each year. It can be incredibly distressing to become the victim of such an incident, predominantly due to the last thing you expect when walking is having your safety compromised by a negligent driver. At Carlson Bier, we understand the emotional turmoil and financial stress pedestrians commonly endure after being hit by vehicles. As one of Illinois’s foremost personal injury attorney groups, we specialize in advocating for those who’ve been traumatized as innocent pedestrians.

The complicated nature of pedestrian accident cases demands legal expertise that can clearly identify parties liable for damages suffered while ensuring victims obtain fair compensation. This is precisely what we offer at Carlson Bier – competent and dedicated legal representation with a primary focus on maximizing your settlement negotiations or court verdicts.

– Pedestrian Right-of-Way: Our firm fights relentlessly for pedestrian rights due to state laws allocating almost all crosswalks as pedestrian zones. Therefore, any motorist infringing such boundaries may bear liability.

– Comparative Negligence: Legally proving fault isn’t always straightforward when dealing with Illinois’s comparative negligence model. We help in situations where drivers claim shared blame between them and casualties to escape full compensation accountability.

– Claims & Settlement Negotiations: We comprehend insurance adjusters’ middleman tactics employed during claim filing processes; hence our aim is forcing insurers into fair deals or taking them head-on at trials should initial negotiations fail.

– Future Medical Expenses Calculations: In addition to immediate medical costs coverage caused directly by road mishaps involving pedestrians, other future related expenses are legally eligible for compensation inclusive in settlements—something many victims tend not to know about their total potential recovery sums meant for actualization through skilled representatives like us.

Moreover, we direct invincible commitment towards justice facilitation if losing loved ones was fate’s unfortunate dictate following unfortunate pedestrian incidents – wrongful death claims specialist attorneys from our group shall ensure the maximum conceivable recovery.

At Carlson Bier, we unde Git stand the distressing aftermath of pedestrian accidents – physical injuries, psychological trauma and hefty medical bills. We are dedicated to walking with you on this journey towards justice. Our proficiency extends beyond just courtrooms; from empathetic listening to an unwavering focus in holding accountable parties responsible for their negligent actions. Whether it’s dealing with stubborn insurance adjusters or tirelessly proving liability before a court jury, our team is fully equipped to handle every facet involved competently.

Due to its complex nature, these accident cases require skilled navigation through different legal aspects such as pedestrian rights, comparative negligence laws among others. As certified personal injury lawyers based in Illinois (not Thayer), we harbor extensive experience in conducting successful settlement negotiations and securing fair compensation sums inclusive of potential future-related costs—a crucial but often overlooked factor.

With us at your defense frontlines, minimal will be your litigation-stress levels – promise Spectrum crossing from thorough case investigations into incident particulars claim-filing processes strategizing right down until full payment disbursement following favorable verdicts or settlements.

Imagine knowing what your case could earn you even before embarking on litigation proceedings? With us by your side while fighting courageously on your behalf for deserved settlement maximums – realize easily! Settling isn’t always simple nor necessarily advantageous to victims’ best interests; however, our tried-and-true negotiation skills lending buffer toward waiving lengthy trials when circumstances deem fit undeniably saves not just time but also precious resources potentially wasted.

As much valued prospective clients – Kickstart the process Today! Allow us position empowering tools inside palm hands help make informed choices about seeking rightful entitlements waiting collection upon taking ultimate action step—Click button below find out yourself how much worth might entail rightfully yours enacted within Carlson Bier’s representation framework

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Thayer Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Thayer

Areas of Practice in Thayer

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or dangerous conditions.

Scald Burns

Giving professional legal advice for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Hospital Incompetence

Providing expert legal services for persons affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Obligation

Addressing cases involving faulty products, supplying professional legal assistance to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip & Tumble Injuries

Adept in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking redress for their injuries.

Childbirth Wounds

Supplying legal aid for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Collisions

Incidents: Concentrated on guiding patients of car accidents obtain appropriate compensation for damages and losses.

Motorcycle Crashes

Committed to providing representation for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Semi Incident

Offering adept legal representation for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just claims for losses.

Building Site Mishaps

Engaged in representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Brain Traumas

Dedicated to offering dedicated legal services for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Harms

Proficient in managing cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Committed to legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unfair Passing

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and skilled legal support to ensure redress.

Neural Injury

Committed to advocating for persons with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​