FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Third Lake

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a spinal cord injury can be a life-altering event, often leading to significant hardships. Carlson Bier, committed to serving Third Lake and its surrounding areas in Illinois, is the go-to attorney group for representing victims of such injuries. While not physically located in Third Lake our esteemed practitioners possess extensive knowledge of state laws close at hand while demonstrating robust proficiency with Spinal Cord Injuries cases. Our dedicated team works earnestly helping clients understand complex legal aspects whilst providing compassionate counsel during the entire litigation process. We fight relentlessly for fair compensation that covers medical expenses, impaired earning capacities or lost wages due to debilitating disabilities stemming from these injuries. What sets us apart is our proven track record and unwavering commitment towards achieving optimal outcomes for those we serve making us an optimal consideration when choosing representation in areas encompassing Third Lake dealing with Spinal Cord Injury matters.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Third Lake Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury cases with a key focus on spinal cord injuries. As a seasoned legal group based in Illinois, we’re passionate about equipping you with all the necessary information about this type of serious bodily harm. Your understanding is central to our strategy as it allows for more productive dialogues and empowering decisions moving forward.

Spinal cord injuries can spell life-altering setbacks and tremendous financial burdens for both victims and their families. They’re primarily caused by traumatic events like road accidents, falls from heights, or violence. However, they can also be due to non-traumatic reasons such as arthritis, cancer, inflammation, infections or disc degeneration.

When a spinal cord injury occurs there’s often an immediate barrage of medical hardships faced by the victims together with intense emotional strain. Let us provide you with invaluable insight into some crucial aspects regarding these injuries:

• Severity: Spinal cord injuries may result in either complete or partial loss of sensory and motor functions beneath the point where trauma occurred; collectively referred to as ‘paralysis’. Paraplegia represents paralysis affecting lower limbs and trunk while quadriplegia implies involvement of all four limbs along with the torso.

• Medical Interventions: Many are subjected to surgeries aiming at stabilizing their spines, preventing future pain or deformities as well as managing existing symptoms. Motor recovery does not happen overnight but across months or years after sustaining such an injury.

• Cost Factor: The initial hospitalization immediately following a single traumatic event causing these types of injuries could easily exceed $100k. Lifetime costs for high tetraplegia patients can surmount even $4 million considering continued healthcare requirements.

• Legal Recourse: Victims hold substantial rights when it comes to seeking compensation for damages incurred due to another’s negligence contributing towards their spine-related suffering.

At Carlson Bier, your representation is anchored in compassion-driven advocacy paired with aggressive prosecution strategies targeted towards securing maximum compensation possible for your case. Years of hands-on experience have equipped us to undertake a thoroughly comprehensive approach complemented by meticulous fact-checking, vigorous settlement negotiations, and tireless court advocacy if your case demands trial litigation.

However, while understanding these key aspects is vital, we also recognize that each case is unique with individual variables in play. Our committed team at Carlson Bier provides personalized legal services directed towards unearthing specific dynamics characteristic to your claim; thus orienting our tactics optimized for propelling you towards attaining rightful justice.

Spinal cord injuries harbor the potential to significantly alter victims’ life trajectories alongside demanding drastic changes across their routines and lifestyles too. At such an emotionally charged juncture, it’s opportune to align oneself with empathetic yet fierce legal representation amplifying incessant demand for justice and fair recovery. With our qualified team at Carlson Bier on side, rest assured that the complexities surrounding your claim are navigated with diligence, rigor, and tactical foresight allowing for optimal resolutions always envisaged.

The structured framework at Carlson Bier ensures accessibility where we emphasize transparency through all stages of our involvement. In addition to this informative empowerment initiative aimed at providing indispensable knowledge about spinal cord injuries; as a victim or family member/caregiver of a person suffering from said misfortune – discern how much value lies within pursuing a legal course centered around championing your rights. For more precise insights pertinent to financial quantification attached to claims identical/similar as yours – click the button below now! Discover how valuable partnering with Carlson Bier in embarking on this journey towards redemption can truly prove beneficial for you today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Third Lake Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Third Lake

Areas of Practice in Third Lake

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Supplying expert legal assistance for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Healthcare Carelessness

Ensuring experienced legal advice for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Fault

Taking on cases involving problematic products, providing professional legal assistance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Malpractice

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Fall & Trip Accidents

Expert in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking justice for their suffering.

Childbirth Traumas

Supplying legal assistance for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Collisions: Devoted to helping sufferers of car accidents get reasonable settlement for wounds and harm.

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal services for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Truck Collision

Delivering specialist legal advice for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for losses.

Worksite Accidents

Focused on defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Damages

Dedicated to extending expert legal advice for persons suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Wounds

Specialized in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from dog bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Specializing in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unjust Fatality

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and adept legal services to ensure redress.

Vertebral Harm

Focused on defending persons with paralysis, offering expert legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440