...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Thomasboro

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has suffered from Dog Bite Injuries in Thomasboro, turn to the experienced and dedicated attorneys at Carlson Bier. Pioneers in personal injury cases, our proficient team knows how to navigate through the complexities of Illinois laws, ensuring our clients receive the compensation they deserve. Effectively managing both minor injuries or severe trauma cases arising from dog attacks requires specific skill sets and resources – attributes we pride ourselves on having at Carlson Bier. Our compassionate approach combined with aggressive representation allows us to develop robust strategies oriented towards maximum recovery for your physical and emotional suffering post a traumatic incident. Opting for Carlson Bier means partnering with attorneys who are committed to justice irrespective of the type of personal injury concern you’re facing – dedicated professionals recognized for going above and beyond for their clients even when dealing with challenging circumstances involving animals that bite humans is involved.As your trusted advocates against Dog Bite Injuries in Thomasboro , choosing Carlson Bier makes all the difference.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Thomasboro Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted allies in navigating dog bite injuries in the state of Illinois. As a renowned personal injury law firm, we strive to arm you with valuable information and empower you with an understanding of your legal rights after such an accident. Dog bites incidents can be highly traumatic both physically and psychologically, causing not only outright pain and suffering but also deep-seated fear or distress. We believe that knowledge is key in overcoming these issues simultaneously while reclaiming what is rightfully yours.

When a dog bites, the effects aren’t confined to physical harm alone; emotional damage may occur, leaving victims terrified or anxiety-ridden around dogs for life. This psychological impact fuels our endeavor at Carlson Bier to ensure our clients are adequately compensated for all forms of suffering endured due to vicious dog attacks. Our process involves thorough investigations where we dig deep into every minute detail related to each case.

There are crucial aspects attached to handling adog bite injury lawsuit:

• Proof of ownership: Identifying and proving pet owner’s identity remains pivotal.

• Establish Liability: Proving owner’s negligence requires showing they failed in preventing the attack from happening.

• Document Injuries: Detailed medical reports provide strong evidence documenting the exact extent of injuries sustained.

• Evaluate Damages: Determining tangible (medical costs) and intangible damages (emotional distress).

Illinois follows strict liability concerning dog attacks meaning the dog’s owner remains fully liable for any injury their pet causes as long as the victim did not provoke it whilst lawfully on the premises where they got bitten. Our team diligently works within this guideline ensuring victims receive full compensation under this provision applicable in the state.

Facing an insurance company without legal representation often ends up being counterproductive given insurance companies try minimizing their payouts as much as possible. Having competent legal counsel like Carlson Bier behind you radically alters situations; we negotiate aggressively ensuring fair compensation covers all expenses incurred including medical bills, lost wages, and emotional suffering.

Navigating dog bite laws can be tiring. Misunderstanding the statute of limitations— which in Illinois is two years right from the date of injury—can lead to loss of rightful compensation. Our team ensures no such inaccuracies or missed timelines hinder your pursuit for justice.

Remember, if you’ve been bitten by a dog in Illinois, the timing is essential; the sooner you speak with an attorney after obtaining necessary medical attention, better are the possibilities of building a stronger case supported by fresh evidence and eyewitness testimonies.

The Carlson Bier legal team’s proficiency lies not only in its profound understanding of Illinois law but also a commitment on bringing about fruitful resolutions for our clients. We acknowledge that each case holds unique elements and requires individualized strategies—a key reason why we maintain a personalized approach towards every client ensuring their needs get properly addressed, their concerns heard, and their rights passionately defended.

We know what you’re going through because we’ve stood beside countless other victims fighting for their rights over the years – garnering us vast experience alongside undiminished passion. Whether it’s overseeing medical documentation, liaising with insurance personnel, negotiating settlements, or advocating vociferously at trials—Carlson Bier offers comprehensive services maintaining an unwavering focus on your wellbeing while relentlessly pursuing just reparation.

At Carlson Bier we remain dedicated to putting forth your best interests provided with compassionate counsel guiding you throughout this disillusioning journey—beginning from when you walk through our doors until a satisfactory resolution gets achieved.

Want to know how much compensation could come your way? Allow us to evaluate your case further so that we may present you with a realistic figure. Just click on the button below—it’s that simple! Trust us—we’re experts who understand these laws like no one else does because defending personal injury victims forms our sole mission here at Carlson Bier: Your Justice Flag-bearers in Illinois.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Thomasboro Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Thomasboro

Areas of Practice in Thomasboro

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Expert in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Providing expert legal advice for patients of serious burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Hospital Carelessness

Providing dedicated legal services for patients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Liability

Dealing with cases involving defective products, offering professional legal guidance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Abuse

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble and Fall Occurrences

Skilled in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking justice for their suffering.

Infant Traumas

Extending legal aid for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Car Mishaps

Mishaps: Committed to helping individuals of car accidents receive reasonable recompense for wounds and harm.

Motorbike Crashes

Committed to providing legal services for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Big Rig Crash

Ensuring adept legal representation for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for losses.

Construction Mishaps

Engaged in supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Head Traumas

Expert in offering expert legal support for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Skilled in addressing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Focused on legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Passing

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and experienced legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spine Injury

Dedicated to representing patients with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer