...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Thomasboro

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When pedestrian accidents occur in Thomasboro, the aftermath can be overwhelming. Legal complexities coupled with personal distress can make a challenging circumstance much worse. But hope is not lost; Carlson Bier brings to bear substantial experience and proven expertise handling such cases right within Illinois state lines. Our focus is solely on relieving your burden by striving tirelessly to secure a successful claim legally entitled to you following a pedestrian accident mishap.

We excel in dissecting multiple factors surrounding pedestrian accidents – assessing the liability quotient, evaluating accompanying injuries, determining compensatory amounts based on medical expenses or loss of remuneration. Every angle gets meticulously scrutinized ensuring you get justice served unequivocally.

What sets Carlson Bier apart from other firms? Our profound commitment towards our clients’ well-being together with an unyielding pursuit for fair reparation denotes our operational ethos rooted in all aspects of personal injury law execution.

Such dedication has earned us widespread recognition as heavyweights championing the cause of pedestrians affected by unforeseen events around Thomasboro and its environs. If you happen upon an unfortunate incident where legal representation becomes essential, trust Carlson Bier’s proficient Pedestrian Accident attorneys – dedicated advocates aiming unfailingly at safeguarding your rights and interests through resolute legal aid.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Thomasboro Illinois

Welcome to the distinguished law firm of Carlson Bier, your premier personal injury attorneys in Illinois. Our dedication takes root in representing those who are victims of pedestrian accidents—shedding light on their rights, explaining potential outcomes, and detailing how our aggressive representation ensures their voices echo within the justice system.

Pedestrian accidents occur when an individual on foot is hit by a vehicle such as a car, motorcycle, or bicycle. The effects can be not only traumatically physical but also psychologically damaging; from broken bones and traumatic brain injuries to paralysis or even loss of life, all culminating in significant emotional distress.

At Carlson Bier, we tirelessly fight for just compensation reflecting the severity of injuries suffered by our clients due to negligent drivers’ actions. Factors considered include:

* Medical Expenses: Immediate medical treatment costs alongside projected future bills related to your accident.

* Lost Wages: Any potential income lost during recovery period or incapability after returning to work.

* Pain & Suffering: Non-economic damages involving mental/emotional anguish endured during and following incident.

* Repair/Replacement Costs: Compensation covering damaged properties like clothing or personal belongings at time of accident.

Navigating through legal realms can prove daunting for a layman – stacking paperwork into mountains you neither have the strength nor inclination to climb is where we come into play. We simplify legal jargon until it’s straightforward and digestible while embodying unswerving champions defending your cause with unmatched professionalism coupled with profound empathy. It’s our guiding principle that no victim should feel overburdened – emotionally, financially or otherwise – while striving for deserved justice.

Liability determination could warrant thorough investigations which encompass witness statements’ analyses among other factors unraveling intricate detail layers proving negligence. On many occasions, however unlikely it may seem initially, these cases unearth more than one liable party contributing towards fortifying claim validity before court hearings thus ensuring maximum compensation recovery.

Procrastination bears grim tidings in personal injury cases due to Illinois’ statute of limitations which stipulates a deadline for filing lawsuits; time hampers case merit. The quicker you initiate unraveling processes, the sooner you curtail accruing medical bills and lost wages conversations into actions set towards battling for your justice.

Although it’s crucial emphasizing Carlson Bier isn’t located explicitly in Thomasboro – misleading would contradict both our principles and governance adhered to by Illinois law – our physical presence remains unconfined. Our reach extended across various counties implies we aggressively represent anyone regardless of their location within the Illinois bounds.

Being pedestrian-specific injury attorneys, we understand intricacies governing these suits intricately meshed with subtleties unique only to such claims – unlike many law firms spreading resources thin over broad spectrum practice areas. Certainty exists that at any given moment, anyone contacting us will receive undivided attention their respective situations warrant.

The journey toward seeking compensation often aligns with an uphill trek filled with quick decisions demanding fast action cordially stopping at just settlements and fair verdicts doorsteps as deserved- battles worth fighting not just because they’re hard but acknowledging winning them are what makes life easier afterwards too.

Ready to break ground on seeking full compensation you deserve? We understand placing trust in someone looks easy until it is your turn – this why we build relationships based first and foremost on trust. The next step mirrors simplicity itself – find out how much your case could be worth by clicking the button below reassuringly assigned to guide rather than guess while ensuring transparent fee structures bear no hidden surprises along way forward navigating uncharted territories together headed towards recovery triumphs!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Thomasboro Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Thomasboro

Areas of Practice in Thomasboro

Bike Mishaps

Expert in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Burns

Giving skilled legal services for victims of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Hospital Misconduct

Extending professional legal services for patients affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Responsibility

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, delivering adept legal help to individuals affected by defective items.

Senior Misconduct

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Slip Accidents

Skilled in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking compensation for their losses.

Newborn Injuries

Supplying legal support for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Crashes

Collisions: Concentrated on guiding victims of car accidents receive just settlement for injuries and destruction.

Motorbike Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Big Rig Collision

Providing expert legal advice for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for hurts.

Worksite Collisions

Engaged in representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Damages

Specializing in providing specialized legal advice for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Skilled in tackling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from dog bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unfair Fatality

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and skilled legal assistance to ensure redress.

Backbone Harm

Dedicated to representing individuals with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​