...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Burn Injuries in Toledo

Burn Injuries Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you have suffered burn injuries owing to another party’s negligence, Carlson Bier is your most reliable legal partner. We are a prominent law firm in Illinois and cater to clients with unwavering dedication across geographical boundaries. Our team of seasoned Burn Injuries attorneys prides themselves on delivering results in the courtroom and offering personalized attention to each case we handle. Over the years, we have demonstrated an impeccable track record in effectively defending our clients’ rights and securing justifiable compensation for their pain, suffering, medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, lost wages among other damages related to burn injuries . Pioneers at negotiating settlements or fighting tooth-and-nail at trial proceedings if needed – Carson Bier embodies excellence when it comes to navigating through complex injury lawsuits that requires specific expertise. Don’t let your rights get dimmed by not choosing proper legal representation; allow us at Carlson Bear be your unyielding advocate against powerful opponents putting up stiff defense efforts.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Burn Injuries Lawyers in Toledo Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the physical and emotional trauma that burn injuries can bring, along with the complexities of finding the right legal representation to handle your claim. As a highly regarded Illinois-based personal injury law firm, our aim is to provide you not only professional service but also clear insight on all aspects when it comes to dealing with burn injuries.

To begin, let’s delve into the diversity of burn injuries one might encounter. These generally fall within three categories: First-degree burns being the least severe don’t reach beyond the top layer of skin, often healing within two weeks without leaving a scar. Second-degree burns extend into more layers of skin which require medical attention as there’s risk for infection or scarring. Third-degree burns are gravely serious involving deeper tissues such as fat, muscle or bone revealing potential black or white charred skin. This type may lead to permanent nerve damage and calls for immediate expert medical intervention.

Understanding how these different degrees and types occur further facilitate anticipation of their repercussions in any given context. Common sources include flame burns from fire incidents, electrical burns from high voltage exposure, hot-liquid scalds usually occurring in domestic environments and chemical burns caused by corrosive substance interaction cutting across household products to industrial chemicals.

• Flame Burns – Major causes include house fires, automobile accidents and defective products.

• Electrical Burns – Accidents due to faulty wiring or product malfunctions.

• Hot Liquid Scalds – Often happening at home due to kitchen mishaps or child-related accidents.

• Chemical Burns – Exposure from cleaning products at home or substances at work constitute typical instances.

Crucially significant are each individual rights following a burn accident; negligence lies central here lending impetus for compensation claims whilst asserting justice measures against liable parties involved be they private individuals or entities.

Victims’ Rights:

1) Right to File A Lawsuit: Victims hold every entitlement toward lawsuit filing for personal injuries within an indeed, time-sensitive two-year window commencing from the injury’s incident date as per Illinois law.

2) Right to Compensation: The resultant trauma caused by financial burden brought upon through medical costs coupled with potential loss of income underscores victims’ right here. Additionally, pain and suffering or impact on lifestyle also require consideration toward determining compensation.

3) Right to Holding Negligent Parties Accountable- Indispensably vital is a thorough investigation drawing out all possible liable parties inclusive of property owners, employers product manufacturers among others.

Interestingly enough, tackling these extensive facts in themselves becomes an uphill task without professional intervention thus prompting due course action towards retaining a seasoned personal injury lawyer specializing in burn injuries. This underlines our commitment at Carlson Bier – magnetizing the essence of expert guidance equipped with experiential proficiency underscored throughout our successful legal claims handling history.

From negotiating with insurance companies – acknowledging their tendency not paying victims fair compensation until pushed legally, to investigating individual cases meticulously identifying key facts influencing outcome direction; setting us apart from other typical legal outfits conforming simply to standardized approaches.

This takes us back to where we began; your journey navigating intimidating adversity following a life-altering event like a burn accident doesn’t have you standing alone. We are driven by unwavering dedication based on familiarity and understanding of just what is at stake for you, making none discountable concerning the efforts channeled toward securing the justice deserved. At Carlson Bier, it remains more than just a case number- You Matter!

We cordially invite you to explore exactly how much your case might be worth – fueling prospects for turning this intrinsically challenging phase around secure in industry-leading support promised through every step ahead. Click the button below today and find out how together we can make things happen!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Toledo Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Burn Accident FAQ​

There are three main types of burn injuries:

  • First-degree burns: These burns affect the outer layer of skin, the epidermis. They cause redness, pain, and swelling.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns affect the epidermis and the dermis, the second layer of skin. They cause redness, pain, swelling, and blistering.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns destroy the epidermis and the dermis, and can also damage the underlying tissues. They cause white, leathery, or charred skin.

Burn injuries can be caused by a variety of factors, including:

  • Heat: This includes flames, hot liquids, steam, and hot objects.
  • Electricity: Electrical burns can be caused by contact with live wires or outlets.
  • Chemicals: Chemical burns can be caused by exposure to acids, alkalis, and other corrosive substances.
  • Radiation: Radiation burns can be caused by exposure to ultraviolet (UV) rays from the sun or to other types of radiation.

The signs and symptoms of a burn injury will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Redness
  • Pain
  • Swelling
  • Blistering
  • Charred skin
  • Difficulty breathing
  • Shock

The treatment options for burn injuries will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common treatment options include:

  • First-degree burns: These burns typically heal on their own within a few days. However, it is important to keep the area clean and moist.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns may need to be treated with medication or surgery.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns typically require surgery and skin grafts.

.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit if your burn injury was caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person or party. A burn injury lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Toledo

Areas of Practice in Toledo

Bicycle Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Providing expert legal support for people of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Physician Misconduct

Providing dedicated legal advice for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Responsibility

Managing cases involving defective products, providing skilled legal help to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Abuse

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Fall Accidents

Specialist in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking recovery for their damages.

Newborn Damages

Providing legal assistance for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Collisions: Dedicated to supporting individuals of car accidents get reasonable settlement for harms and impairment.

Motorcycle Accidents

Committed to providing legal support for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

18-Wheeler Crash

Ensuring expert legal advice for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for hurts.

Building Site Incidents

Concentrated on advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Cerebral Harms

Dedicated to delivering expert legal assistance for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Wounds

Adept at handling cases for victims who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Dedicated to legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Wrongful Demise

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and expert legal services to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Injury

Expert in assisting individuals with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​