...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Toledo

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the consequences of a dog bite injury in Toledo, professional legal guidance is invaluable. Carlson Bier positions itself as an exceptional consideration for your needs, boasting extensive experience in personal injury law. Their skilled attorneys can effectively navigate the complexities that often surround dog bite cases: from identifying responsible parties to handling negotiations with insurance companies adeptly. They understand intimately how serious these injuries can be—physically, emotionally and financially—and strive to secure maximum compensation for every client. With their comprehensive understanding of Illinois’ strict liability laws governing dog bite incidents, they have successfully advocated for victims across different courts. Opting for Carlson Bier means choosing stalwarts committed not just to winning your case but also alleviating the pressures associated with such distressful situations through clear advice and unswerving support.” At Carlson Bier: your pain finds its voice; we provide assurance anchored on competence.'” Trust them today—they are simply a call away.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Toledo Illinois

When dog bites occur, the victim may suffer from severe injuries such as infection, scarring, or even psychological trauma. These situations can be complex and serious – that’s why attorneys at Carlson Bier are here to help. Operating in Illinois with a specialty in personal injury law, we offer professional representation and guidance for victims of dog bite instances across the state.

As renowned experts in the field of personal injury law, we understand how distressing a dog bite incident can be. Acute physical pain is often accompanied by emotional distress and potentially hefty medical bills – all of which contribute to a scenario where legal recourse may be necessary. A study has shown that about 800,000 people need medical attention each year because they’ve been bitten by dogs. In Illinois alone thousands fall prey to these terrible episodes.

Being fully cognizant of Illinois State Laws pertaining to dog bite incidents is crucial for gaining compensation. Some key points worth noting include:

– The “One Bite Rule” doesn’t apply in Illinois: Unlike some states where owners are only held liable if their pet has exhibited aggressive behavior before or it’s not their first time biting someone; In Illinois, this exemption does not exist.

-In addition to this rule, under certain circumstances, landlords can also be held accountable if you were bitten on their property.

-The Statute of Limitations: In accordance with the law in Illinois, you generally have two years from the date of your injury (dog bite) to file a lawsuit against the person responsible for your injuries.

Our team takes every case seriously. We believe that no one should carry burdens imposed upon them because of another party’s neglect or irresponsibility. Property owners owe a duty of care towards invited visitors and when such standard care isn’t upheld causing an incident like a bitting by a dog occurrs; They should rightfully bear responsibility

Through our operational years as dedicated personal injury attorneys based out of Illnois , we at Carlson Bier have successfully helped numerous clients obtain the compensation they deserved. Our team works tirelessly to ensure that every factor surrounding your case is meticulously addressed- from collecting evidence, identifying and interviewing witnesses, through to obtaining medical records that attest to the extent of injury thereby ensuring a compelling case is built

However, understanding if you are eligible for a claim or how much your case might be worth can be difficult, especially when you’re dealing with trauma or recovery. This is where our expertise comes into play. Our well-experienced attorneys are available 24/7 to guide you on this journey. Remember: It’s not just about getting compensated, it’s also about making sure such incidents see a decrease.

At Carlson Bier, we hold an unrivaled commitment towards client satisfaction and progress along each step in their personal injury law cases. We pride ourselves on strong attorney-client relationships which ensures optimal transparency and strategised decisions for success.

No one should endure the aftermath of a dog bite alone – and with us by your side; You definitely won’t have to! With Carlson Bier as your dedicated legal partner , justice won’t seem far-fetched.

As you navigate these challenging circumstances allow us to ease certain burdens associated with dog bite instances…we encourage you to utilize Carlson Bier’s resources today.An evaluation of what your case might be worth is merely a click away! Learn more by clicking the button below. Trust in our dedicated professionalism .Put us on your side for justice ;You deserve no less than the best representation possible !

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Toledo Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Toledo

Areas of Practice in Toledo

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Traumas

Supplying professional legal support for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Hospital Misconduct

Offering specialist legal services for clients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Fault

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, offering adept legal assistance to clients affected by defective items.

Geriatric Malpractice

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Stumble Occurrences

Skilled in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking redress for their injuries.

Newborn Wounds

Offering legal assistance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Crashes: Focused on helping individuals of car accidents receive appropriate remuneration for hurts and impairment.

Motorbike Crashes

Committed to providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Trucking Crash

Ensuring experienced legal advice for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for injuries.

Construction Incidents

Dedicated to defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Brain Harms

Dedicated to offering compassionate legal advice for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Damages

Skilled in handling cases for victims who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Incidents

Committed to legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unfair Passing

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and professional legal guidance to ensure justice.

Vertebral Harm

Focused on assisting clients with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​