FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Tolono

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has been injured by a dog bite in Tolono, Carlson Bier is the paramount choice for professional legal representation. Our skilled and knowledgeable group of attorneys specializes in dog bite injuries, offering astute guidance through the complex process of injury claims. At Carlson Bier, our mission is to ensure your rights are safeguarded while we vigorously fight to secure damages related to medical costs, pain and suffering endured as an outcome of these unfortunate incidents. Our track record speaks volumes; numerous clients have found relief and received fair compensations due to our expert counsel on this specialized area of law. With unmatched dedication and proficiency in personal injury cases resulting from dog attacks, we aid people facing overwhelming situations with diligence and compassion. Choose Carlson Bier’s seasoned expertise when negotiating settlements or presenting compelling arguments at trial – all aimed towards achieving maximum compensation for your hardship caused by such traumatic experiences – because here at Carlson Bier you’re not just another case but a valued client deserving justice.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Tolono Illinois

At Carlson Bier, one of the top-tier personal injury attorney firms in Illinois, we understand that the effects of a dog bite can be both physical and emotional. Undeniably dog bites pose significant health risks, potentially leading to serious injuries or illnesses for the victim. However, believe that no person should bear this burden alone. Our team is deeply committed to providing you with comprehensive legal support in seeking justice and compensation.

Remarkably, an estimated 4.5 million instances of dog bites occur annually in the United States but only a fraction of these incidents result in legal action. Such cases necessitate expertise due to their unique nature as they come surrounded by multifaceted layers including animal laws and regulations, insurance considerations and fault determinations among others.

• First thing first: Dog owners hold responsibility over their pets’ actions according to Illinois’s Animal Control Act. This law implies that a pet owner would be held liable if his/her unmuzzled dog attacks a person without provocation.

• Understanding Liability: It extends beyond just dogs biting humans. The same law applies even if someone got injured while trying to escape an aggressive dog.

• Claims Deadline: According to state law, victims have two years from the date of injury caused by animal bite/attack to bring forward a lawsuit.

Carlson Bier possesses extensive experience handling dog bite-related cases diligently maximizing potential recovery for affected clients under strict adherence with statutes outlined above along with additional considerations such as local leash laws or unreported vicious propensities prominent especially when dealing with breeds labeled “dangerous” or “vicious.”

The ripple effect from injuries drawn from canine attacks reach far beyond immediate medical attention; future surgeries may be necessary particularly ones involving plastic surgery for cosmetic correction following scarring/disfigurement inflicted during attack inclusively ongoing counseling sessions nessesityated dually by traumatic stress experienced during incident topping on potential income loss incurred whilst recovering physically/emotionally .

Illinois laws provide generous protection to victims of dog bites, allowing for the pursuit of compensation for:

• Immediate and future medical expenses

• Therapy or counseling costs

• Income loss from inability to work

• Non-economic losses like pain and suffering

Taking into account these complex factors, the experienced team at Carlson Bier crafts a comprehensive and compelling case in your favor. By working on every finer detail perfectly, our lawyers leverage experience for ensuring maximum entitled recovery reaches you.

Your journey back to normalcy following such a traumatic ordeal isn’t devoid of challenges but we assure you neither daunting insurance companies nor complex legal loopholes will be inconveniences you’ll face alone. Instead, our attorneys promise unwavering dedication standing alongside advocating tirelessly while crafting robust, detailed cases ensuring no deserving compensation gets left off balance sheet.

As specialists in personal injury law firm, trust us when we say time plays a considerable factor here. Promptly pursuing your claim significantly strengthens its chances it has walk through litigation minefield triumphantly plus it aids us gather solid evidence whilst memories are still fresh as eyewitness statements proven crucial – Now is the definitive action hour!

We cordially invite you take that all-important step towards seeking worthy resolution by clicking on the button below.

Discovering what your case holds isn’t just possible but undeniably necessary! Uncover now how much worth lies within overlooked details; give voice over neglected injuries plus overall courageously reclaim power unjustly seized away from undeserving maul victim. With Carlson Bier your steady pursuit upon rightful justice trail awaits intricately crafted gainful safeguard bringing triumphant fruition negotiated win vision closer than pervious reality reflected prior our partnership introductory realization phase impelling forward-looking motion unveiled right here, right now.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Tolono Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Tolono

Areas of Practice in Tolono

Bicycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Burn Damages

Offering skilled legal support for people of major burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Clinical Negligence

Providing professional legal assistance for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, providing adept legal assistance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Mistreatment

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Tumble Incidents

Specialist in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking recovery for their suffering.

Neonatal Harms

Providing legal assistance for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Collisions: Focused on helping clients of car accidents obtain equitable remuneration for damages and destruction.

Bike Incidents

Expert in providing representation for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Big Rig Accident

Extending adept legal assistance for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for injuries.

Building Incidents

Engaged in supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Cognitive Injuries

Expert in providing professional legal support for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Damages

Expertise in managing cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Loss

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and experienced legal support to ensure restitution.

Spine Injury

Focused on representing persons with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​