...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Toluca

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the aftermath of a dog bite injury can be stressful, that’s when Carlson Bier comes to your aid. Being experienced attorneys in Illinois, we apply our extensive knowledge about Dog Bite Injuries for those impacted by such unfortunate incidents in Toluca. We understand the potential severity of these injuries and are proficient at presenting clear-cut evidence aligned with Illinois law. At Carlson Bier, we offer steadfast advocacy while ensuring compliance with state regulations on representation specifics. Our team is adept at intricately understanding medical findings related to canine-inflicted harm and correlating it to legal jargon efficiently; this contributes towards formulating a compelling case for you. While working tirelessly behind courtroom doors, not only do we defend your rights vehemently but also ensure accessibility around-the-clock along your journey towards justice after dog bite induced distress – always putting our clients first underlines our services’ ethos at Carlson Bier amplifying us as an ideal choice when seeking legal assistance pertaining to Dog Bite Injuries.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Toluca Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we have a wealth of experience successfully representing individuals who experienced dog bite injuries. Dog bites can be traumatic and life-altering events, causing significant physical damage along with emotional trauma. Our team is dedicated to providing high-quality legal representation in these incidents and helping our clients restore their peace of mind.

In the state of Illinois, there are specific laws pertinent to dog bite cases under the ‘Animal Control Act.’ Key aspects include:

• The law places strict liability on the owner of a vicious or dangerous dog for any injuries the animal causes.

• No previous history of aggression by the dog needs to be proven for claims resulting from unprovoked attacks.

• Owning a “dangerous” or “vicious” dog could potentially bear criminal charges if it leads to severe injury or death.

Dog bite injuries pose serious health risks beyond mere physical pain. Some potential consequences that victims need careful attention towards include:

• Infections: Rabies and Tetanus are two severe infections that may develop after a dog bite incident.

• Scarring: Dogs’ sharp teeth can lead to permanent disfigurement due to persisting scarring.

• Emotional distress: Psychological trauma often follows such incidences affecting social behaviour and mental well-being long term.

We believe you must know your rights when you’re involved in such an unfortunate event. The costs incurred as result of treatment, therapy sessions, loss of income during medical leave and more should not fall upon you but rather on the negligent party i.e., usually the owner’s insurance company.

It is noteworthy here that each case varies significantly based on factors like severity sustaining physical disfigurement, psychological impact etcetera. Hence no hard-and-fast rule applies universally; it depends primarily depending upon circumstances surrounding each situation uniquely.

A crucial step towards acquiring fair compensation involves thorough investigation which naturally requires access sophisticated resources like professional accident reconstruction experts; this where assistance firms becomes invaluable – we provide comprehensive support throughout process, right up until point negotiation or trial if necessary.

At Carlson Bier, our approach is meticulous; your case will be extensively investigated, medical experts may be consulted to ascertain severity and impact of the injury while juggling stringent legal deadlines. All the while keeping you constantly informed and ensuring your best interests are at the forefront of every decision. Our client-centric approach ensures that your unique needs are considered at each step in order to build a robust claim.

It’s crucially important to understand that not all law firms share this commitment to detailed advocacy – many tend towards quick settlement offers that rarely serve clients’ best interests. At Carlson Bier, we firmly object on such practices which disregard thoroughness justice deserves. We pursue nothing less than maximum compensation potential for each client we represent.

We acknowledge the emotional strain and financial burden dog bite incidents bring upon victims; thus making sure even initial consultation with us doesn’t add any additional fiscal load on them – it’s entirely free! During this session, we openly discuss nitty-gritty of their case, as well as subsequent steps they can expect if they decide working together.

Choosing an advocate post dog-bite incident might feel overwhelming amidst accident aftermath chaos but remember: professionals who’ve handled similar cases successfully before – like team here Carlson Bier—would only make journey easier for you significantly, aiding faster recovery overall turning tide favor once again renegotiating terms life most effectively possible under given circumstances.

Are you ready take first towards gaining control over life back? Click button below find just how much potentially worth- after having gone through painful experience traumatic incident deserve peace mind knowing fully compensated needless pain suffering underwent due others negligence re-establish balance justice achieved respect dignity preserved intact court law.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Toluca Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Toluca

Areas of Practice in Toluca

Cycling Collisions

Focused on legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Extending expert legal support for victims of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Medical Misconduct

Delivering professional legal services for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, supplying professional legal assistance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Stumble Occurrences

Specialist in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking compensation for their harm.

Infant Traumas

Providing legal support for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Crashes: Focused on helping patients of car accidents gain reasonable recompense for wounds and harm.

Bike Accidents

Specializing in providing legal services for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Big Rig Incident

Extending experienced legal services for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for injuries.

Construction Mishaps

Dedicated to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Injuries

Focused on providing expert legal advice for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Focused on legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unjust Demise

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Harm

Dedicated to representing individuals with vertebral damage, offering expert legal guidance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer