...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Tovey

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Facing the aftermath of a dog bite injury can be overwhelming. Searching for adequate legal representation in such trying times should not heighten your stress, and that’s where Carlson Bier steps in. Known across Illinois for our expertise, we at Carlson Bier are accessible, dedicated personal Injury attorneys specializing in dog bite injuries cases. Our acumen is underscored by our comprehensive understanding of state laws pertaining to these types of incidents. Navigating the murky waters of a lawsuit involves myriad complexities; however, with Carlson Bier steering your case towards fair compensation and justice becomes unequivocally assured. Furthermore, while many firms may retain a broad focus on numerous areas of law practice concurrently–potentially diluting their effectiveness–we stand apart through our concerted dedication towards personal injury investigations alone: it’s what defines us as leaders versed in intricate causational factors surrounding dog bites. Choose Carlson Bier when you or loved ones suffer from canine-inflicted trauma because uncompromised professional prowess coupled with steadfast commitment to victims ensures formidable advocacy for preserving your rights during this challenging journey.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Tovey Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand how traumatic it can be to suffer from a dog bite injury. Navigating the legal landscape while dealing with physical and emotional consequences of such an event can seem daunting. This is why we are wholly committed to helping you or your loved ones secure the justice they rightfully deserve in Illinois.

Dog bite injuries often result in serious and long-lasting repercussions that go beyond immediate pain: physical disfigurement, mental trauma, costly medical bills for treatment & rehabilitation, potential loss of income due to inability work during recovery period – these are all real concerns burdening victims. Under Illinois laws, compensation is available for individuals who have suffered under such distressing circumstances.

• Onus on dog owners: In contrast to some jurisdictions where one needs to prove the owner’s negligence or prior knowledge about their pet’s aggressive behavior, Illinois law assigns ‘strict liability’ on dog owners. Simply put, if their dogs inflict harm without any provocation on someone either legally present at any location, the owner is held liable barring very few exceptions.

• Potential claims you can make: It extends not only for bites but covers injuries caused by attacks as well; even instances when a dog causes another person to become injured just by knocking them over. Compensation being sought might include aspects like medical expenses – present & future projections both- lost wages if victim was rendered unable to work during the recovery period, and payments for psychological counseling required as part of coping mechanism.

• Time limit for filing claim: Under statute limitations presiding in Illinois law around personal injury cases, you have just within two years from date of attack/bite incident to seek recompense making it all important that victims reach out early enough towards skilled legal counsel like ours at Carlson Bier so there’s ample time available for detailed investigation before filing a lawsuit.

Successfully advocating your case requires more than just proving ownership of animal involved & demonstrating unprovoked attack though. It involves negotiating with insurance companies who may try to downplay the level of injury severity you suffered or questioning the amount of compensation being asked for – an activity where legal professionals prove particularly useful.

Together, we at Carlson Bier bring to table years of expertise & successful track record in handling dog bite injuries across Illinois, relentlessly pursuing justice for our clients. Decades worth experience has honed us in artfully navigating through complexities underlying these personal injury cases.

Our focus remains on building a case that accurately showcases your suffering and presents compelling argument for maximum remuneration possible. We shoulder the responsibility of navigating through intricate Walter falls legal proceedings making sure you can rest your energy instead towards recovery and healing process.

Remember, everyone deserves competent representation regardless how complex their situation might be. If you’ve suffered from a dog bite injury, don’t feel as if you have to deal with this on your own. Let us help you sort out the practical implications around submitting claims against involved parties so your legal rights remain always protected given gravity of matter at hand.

Understanding whole gamut around impact such an incident impacts victim’s life can seem overwhelming indeed which is why it’s always advisable seeking professional guidance like ours here at Carlson Bier where client servicing is paramount. Be assured—we’re vested to deliver what is rightfully deserved by individuals embroiled in similar situations under Illinois jurisdiction particularly.

The journey towards securing rightful compensation can seem daunting but remember it’s not one that needs traveling alone anymore—reach out today itself! Click on the button below now & find exclusively how much potentially could your case be worth throughout this ordeal – start new chapter ahead confident in knowing we stand together alongside!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Tovey Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Tovey

Areas of Practice in Tovey

Bicycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Flame Damages

Supplying professional legal assistance for victims of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Medical Malpractice

Offering specialist legal advice for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Fault

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering adept legal assistance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Aged Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Fall and Slip Accidents

Specialist in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking redress for their injuries.

Neonatal Damages

Providing legal support for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Collisions: Focused on guiding sufferers of car accidents obtain appropriate remuneration for damages and impairment.

Bike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal assistance for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Semi Collision

Providing professional legal representation for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for hurts.

Building Crashes

Concentrated on defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Head Injuries

Dedicated to ensuring dedicated legal support for patients suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Proficient in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Specializing in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unfair Demise

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and experienced legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Trauma

Dedicated to representing individuals with paralysis, offering compassionate legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​