Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Tovey

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a spinal cord injury, placing your trust in the right attorney is crucial. The unique expertise of Carlson Bier significantly enhances prospects for compensation. As experienced Illinois-based lawyers, we have an exceptional track record managing complex Spinal Cord Injury cases with tenacity and dedication. Possessing a rich tapestry of understanding built upon years representing clients like you; those suffering due to negligence or malpractice resulting in such injuries. At Carlson Bier, we strategize meticulously – fighting hard to ensure you receive rightful restitution for medical costs, pain and suffering experienced due to this life-altering event. Our attorneys adeptly navigate intricate legalities surrounding these unprecedented circumstances, yet remain ever compassionate about your realities – truly rendering us partners in your journey towards recuperation and closure post-injury. If you are seeking relentless representation coupled with empathetic support as victims of spinal cord injuries residing within Tovey’s jurisdiction-growing number amidst all personal injury claims across Illinois-your best choice remains unarguably: Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Tovey Illinois

Spinal cord injuries are regarded as some of the most severe and life-altering afflictions that anyone can endure, often resulting in drastic changes to an individual’s lifestyle, livelihood, and general well-being. At Carlson Bier, a leading personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we understand the immense challenges our clients face – both physically and emotionally – following such catastrophic incidents.

As experienced personal injury attorneys specializing in spinal cord injuries, we realize first-hand that the journey towards recovery is multifaceted. It isn’t just about physical recuperation; it’s also about addressing the financial implications related to long-term medical care needs, loss of employment income, adjustments for accessibility at home or work among other unanticipated costs. And all these could significantly distress one’s mental health.

Understanding spinal cord injuries is crucial when considering litigation options after accidents leading to such severe trauma. Briefly defined as damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves at the end of the spinal canal (also known as cauda equina), these types of injuries often result in permanent changes — whether it is strength sensation or bodily functions below the site of injury.

Let’s delve into additional fact points around this:

– There are two primary types of Spinal Cord Injuries: Complete & Incomplete. In a “complete” SCI, total lack of sensory and motor functions occur beneath the level where injury occurred. An “incomplete” SCI means you may have some functioning below said levels.

– Depending on their severity and location along your spine, they oftentimes lead to paralysis termed paraplegia (paralysis below waist) or quadriplegia/tetraplegia (paralysis below neck).

Should you be grappling with aftermaths following a tragic accident causing such profound adversity; remember you’re not alone — Carlson Bier remains firmly committed to being by your side during this arduous legal journey. As advocates prioritizing your best interests, we strive to ensure you attain justice through securing rightful compensation for the losses and pain incurred.

Admittedly, personal injury cases — especially those concerning spinal cord trauma — are complex. They require experienced legal representation equipped with strong technical understanding of pertinent medical facts in tandem with application of the correct laws applicable.

Here’s what our professional approach encompasses:

– Comprehensive review of case details including analysis of involved actions leading to accident, inspection of medical reports etc.

– Uncovering negligence/risk factors contributing to mishap.

– Determining suitable compensation commensurate with the severity of injury, impact on life quality and future prognosis as indicated by medical experts.

Moreover, recognizing that these litigation battles can be emotionally draining; we have a dedicated team working tirelessly not only towards delivering favorable legal results but also providing compassionate counsel during such challenging times.

We believe it’s essential for you to recuperate without added stress from prolonged lawsuits and take pride offering our services on a contingency fee basis meaning – there is absolutely no upfront payment for our services. We are compensated once successful resolution is reached based on an agreed percentage parted from awarded judgement or settlement amount ensuing post your victory in court or pre-trial phase respectively – indicating that we’re fully vested together with you in this fight for justice!

Whether your catastrophic event occurred due to motor vehicle accidents, slip & fall episodes at hazardous premises or any other form accident which could’ve been avoidable should reasonable care had been exercised — Our skilled and committed attorneys at Carlson Bier stand ready to provide zealous advocacy towards ensuring wrongful parties answer rightfully in law’s court.

If you find yourself grappling with ramifications following a terrifying bodily injury like spinal cord damage – DON’T despair! Reach out today so we can help assess where you stand legally regarding your situation.

Make use of this opportunity NOW—click the button below—to learn more about what your case might be valued at, gauged roughly through careful consideration via in-depth evaluation by our expert attorneys. Enabling us to aid you is just a click away.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Tovey Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Tovey

Areas of Practice in Tovey

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Offering adept legal help for victims of intense burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Clinical Misconduct

Extending professional legal support for victims affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Accountability

Managing cases involving faulty products, delivering adept legal help to clients affected by harmful products.

Senior Abuse

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Slip Injuries

Skilled in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking redress for their losses.

Birth Damages

Offering legal help for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Mishaps: Committed to aiding clients of car accidents receive fair recompense for wounds and damages.

Motorcycle Accidents

Specializing in providing legal services for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Trucking Accident

Ensuring specialist legal services for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for hurts.

Construction Accidents

Committed to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Brain Damages

Focused on ensuring specialized legal support for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Proficient in managing cases for people who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unfair Loss

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and skilled legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Injury

Focused on representing patients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer