Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Tower Hill

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a slip and fall accident, who better to trust than Carlson Bier? Renowned for unwavering dedication in serving personal injury victims across Illinois. Brimming with experienced legal eagles proficient in successfully handling diverse slip and fall cases. At Carlson Bier, we understand every case’s seriousness; hence we ardently ensure you get the deserved compensation for medical expenses, lost wages or being unjustly rendered immobile by someone else’s negligence. Our laudable success rate sets us apart from ordinary law establishments around Tower Hill vicinity, which can be attributed to our modus operandi—meticulous case examination, aggressive representation while maintaining empathy towards evolving client needs. We operate on a contingency basis— charging fees only if victorious . Tackling legal wrangling without competent assistance might often prove detrimental leaving victims desolate under compounding stress and mounting bills . Be rest assured , choosing Carlson Bier means entrusting your case to dedicated experts harboring effective strategies for litigating such claims capably maximising your potential settlements.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Tower Hill Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the dizzying toll a slip and fall accident can have on your life. When you find yourself a victim of such an incident due to someone else’s negligence or carelessness, it is important to know that legal rights protect you. As premier personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our unwavering commitment ensures that justice is served.

Slip and fall accidents occur when an individual slips, trips, or falls as a result of dangerous or hazardous conditions on another person’s property. Although they might seem trivial or routine (“Accidents happen”), these incidents can often lead to severe injuries like fractures, sprains, head injuries including traumatic brain injury (TBI), and sometimes even fatal outcomes.

Of particular relevance are three key factors:

– The condition of the premises where the slip and fall incident happened: Was there poor lighting? Were there any warning signs posted near the hazard? Was the pathway damaged?

– What role the owner or occupier played in keeping their property safe: Had they noticed any potential dangers but failed to manage them accordingly?

– The actions of the injured party: Was there anything they could have done differently to prevent their fall?

Understanding who is at fault in slip and fall cases relies heavily on examining these aspects closely.

It is essential for anyone who has encountered such misfortune to seek help immediately—not just medical—but also legal aid. At Carlson Bier, our collective experience allows us analytical depth into such scenarios. We meticulously monitor every detail—like testimonies from witnesses if available, photographs of accident space taken following an incident—to ensure that each case receives dedicated attention with credibility at its core.

Moreover, according to Illinois law under Premises Liability Act Section 2-105(a), proprietors must uphold reasonable levels of maintenance on their properties for those permitted onto said location which includes regular inspections for hazards (e.g.: spills/water leaks/ice/snow) that could potentially lead to slip and falls. If a proprietor is found violating these laws, they may be held responsible for any injuries inflicted on their property due to lack of safety measures.

Dealing with the aftermath of such incidents often means medical bills, work loss, physical pain, emotional distress among others—factors which can financially incapacitate you if not addressed appropriately. At Carlson Bier, we aim to alleviate this stress by focusing vehemently on getting our clients the fair compensation they deserve while they recover.

When it comes to personal injury claims like in cases of slip and fall accidents, the statute of limitations—that is—the window period within which legal proceedings must be initiated after an incident is crucial; In Illinois, that’s two years from the date of your accident. Failing to meet such deadlines might cost you your rightful entitlements. Therefore, promptly seeking expert guidance will guard against forfeiting valuable recompense for damages incurred owing to another party’s negligence.

At Carlson Bier we honor our commitment towards uprightness and promptness by delivering results-driven law services—a testament mirrored in our remarkable history of victories over legitimate slip and fall lawsuits across Illinois. Our strategic approach embodies extensive investigation paired with skilled negotiation tactics aimed at achieving maximum settlements or awards whether via mediation or trials thereby ensuring that justice prevails.

As an established personal injury attorney group based in Illinois without implications suggestive of being located elsewhere such as Tower Hill—residents across Illinois trust us unfailingly for championing their cause when recklessness strikes unforeseen!

Now that you are better equipped about slip and fall accidents along with the protective scope under Illinois law; understand how colossal a difference one professional decision can make during crisis times: Connect today with experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier – Let us guide your steps towards fair redressal meaningfully.

Click on the button below—if peace-of-mind linked to knowing what your case could potentially yield reassures you—we extend the same reassurance by offering an exclusive case evaluation considering your unique circumstances. Remember: Your rightful compensation is not merely calculable, but also legally recoverable—let us show you how!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Tower Hill Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Tower Hill

Areas of Practice in Tower Hill

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Proficient in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Damages

Offering skilled legal services for people of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Healthcare Malpractice

Extending experienced legal advice for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Liability

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, offering adept legal assistance to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Elder Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Slip Mishaps

Skilled in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking recovery for their losses.

Infant Harms

Providing legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Incidents

Accidents: Concentrated on guiding victims of car accidents receive appropriate payout for wounds and destruction.

Bike Collisions

Specializing in providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Big Rig Collision

Extending experienced legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just claims for injuries.

Worksite Crashes

Focused on representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Head Impairments

Focused on extending professional legal support for victims suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Wounds

Expertise in dealing with cases for people who have suffered traumas from dog bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Incidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unfair Death

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and skilled legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spine Impairment

Committed to representing persons with paralysis, offering specialized legal representation to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer