FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Tremont

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering a spinal cord injury can be life-altering and pursuing justice requires expertise, compassion and dedication. Carlson Bier is an acclaimed choice for such legal representation in Illinois, with deep-seated understanding of these complex cases. Our attorneys carefully investigate every case to ensure the best possible outcome for our clients. We have garnered exceptional results on behalf of individuals statewide, making us trusted advocates in this sphere of law.

Our commitment extends far beyond victory in court; we strategically fight for optimal health care and rehabilitation outcomes too. Knowledge from years spent specializing exclusively in personal injuries like spinal cord damage means we’re capable of tackling complicated medical jargon head-on, whilst arguing your right to compensation effectively.

Navigating through procedural complexities with ease due to profound statutory knowledge underpins our success rate. At Carlson Bier, you are not merely treated as another case number but rather as family needing support during tough times. Trusting us with your case isn’t just choosing legal representation; it’s embracing a partnership striving together towards justice after a spinal cord injury ordeal.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Tremont Illinois

If you or a loved one has sustained a devastating spinal cord injury, Carlson Bier in Illinois is your go-to professional resource. Our dedicated team of personal injury attorneys specialize in cases highlighting the complexity and long-lasting impact of such traumatic bodily harm.

Excellently trained and highly skilled, our mission at Carlson Bier is to deliver top-notch legal services that ensure those who suffer such catastrophic injuries receive maximum compensation for their pain, suffering, medical expenses, loss of earnings capacity, and other associated costs.

Spinal Cord Injuries pose unique challenges due to their ability to drastically alter an individual’s life balance. They often occur due to traumatic events like car crashes or falls, but sometimes they can also result from non-traumatic causes such as disease.

• Primary Spinal Cord Injury: This type happens at the instant of trauma where the physical impact directly damages the spinal cord. The degree of damage doesn’t necessarily correlate with the initial cause; hence it’s essential that victims get immediate medical attention.

• Secondary Spinal Cord Injury: This refers to progressive damage occurring overtime after trauma – largely consisting of molecular and cellular changes.

Victims often endure immense pain along with obstructed motor skills resulting in either partial or total paralysis – paraplegia or tetraplegia respectively. Paraplegia mainly affects legs and lower body functions while tetraplegia affects arms too alongside impacting respiratory system leading to increased dependence on caregivers.

The emotional toll these drastic changes may inflict upon victims can be overwhelming. We fully understand this fact here at Carlson Bier which drives us towards relentlessly striving for justice on behalf of our clients by managing every detail meticulously thereby alleviating some stress they might face navigating through legal complexities themselves during hard times.

We navigate persistently on targeted strategies intending maximum recompense whether it calls for out-of-court settlement negotiations or maintaining resolute stances in courtrooms when necessary.

At Carlson Bier we consider the aftermath that a spinal cord injury might have not only on patients but also their immediate family. Hence, we offer compassionate legal support that covers advising families about dealing with insurance companies, recovery resources along with counseling programs for emotional heft.

What sets up apart is our firm belief in building strong client relationships through unconditional dedication and unwavering determination to secure favorable outcomes, paired seamlessly with impeccable expertise and deep understanding of laws governing personal injuries in varying contexts.

Regardless of how complex or daunting your circumstances might seem – know that you are not alone. We extend our hand to be by your side guiding at every step while you focus most on recovery amidst these trying times.

We’re committed to offering comprehensive advice designed to enlighten and empower affected individuals to facilitate informed decision making as we march towards the collective goal – winning rightful justice!

Though it’s stressful enough coping with life-altering consequences of such injuries yet we suggest adopting proactive attitudes towards championing challenges thrown at them because early action is critical for achieving desirable results particularly when asserting personal injury rights.

Take control today by clicking upon the button below encouraging yourself towards a new hope filled journey inviting wealth wisdom into your new lives post traumas. Remember – no one does it better than Carlson Bier when reckoning rightful compensations tailored for enriching futures within business accords aligned perfectly well under Illinois law provisions guarding truthfulness in publicizing legal services locations! Permit us serving you best by aligning together coupled seamlessly against an unfortunate adversity defining grounds for a challenging lawsuit game!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Tremont Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Tremont

Areas of Practice in Tremont

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Expert in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Wounds

Providing expert legal support for victims of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Physician Malpractice

Offering expert legal representation for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Responsibility

Managing cases involving dangerous products, offering adept legal support to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Trip Occurrences

Professional in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking restitution for their suffering.

Birth Injuries

Delivering legal help for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Mishaps: Dedicated to supporting patients of car accidents obtain appropriate recompense for injuries and impairment.

Bike Collisions

Specializing in providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Semi Collision

Extending specialist legal services for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for hurts.

Building Site Mishaps

Committed to assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Brain Harms

Dedicated to providing expert legal representation for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Harms

Proficient in handling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Expert in legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Passing

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and experienced legal representation to ensure justice.

Vertebral Damage

Focused on defending victims with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440