...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Tuscola

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the aftermath of a dog bite injury in Tuscola, choosing the right law firm is crucial to ensuring your rights are protected. Carlson Bier expertise lies precisely in handling these complex cases personally and professionally. We know how traumatic dealing with dog bite injuries can be, involving not only physical but also psychological wounds that may linger far beyond your initial recovery. With our team’s help, you will navigate legal processes confidently and proficiently while seeking fair compensation for medical bills or lost wages due to incapacitation from injuries sustained. Carlson Bier’s attorneys bear an exceptional understanding of Illinois regulations regarding animal attacks with proven success record advocating for victims like you compels courts for just recompense—making us a premier choice when it comes to selecting a lawyer for dog bite injury lawsuits. Partnering with us gives you access to committed advocates who fight tirelessly on behalf of clients dealing against negligent pet owners Our focus remains squarely on helping you heal by providing top-tier legal representation through every step of your case; consider making the first call today – choose Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Tuscola Illinois

When you or a loved one is the victim of a dog bite injury, it’s crucial to understand your rights and recourses. Each year, countless individuals suffer from this type of injury, often accruing hefty medical expenses and enduring significant emotional trauma in the process. Carlson Bier Associates fights tirelessly for victims just like you – our mission lies firmly in advocating for justice and ensuring compensation commensurate with your pain and suffering.

Dog bites are unfortunately common occurrences that could take an immense toll on physical health, mental wellbeing and financial stability. Often, these bites go unreported either due to fear or ignorance of available legal avenues. The injuries caused by dog bites can range from minor cuts and bruises to severe flesh wounds requiring surgical intervention. Frustratingly enough, many victims are unaware that they can make rightful claims for remuneration to cover both immediate medical costs as well as long-term treatment or therapy needs that may ensue following such incidents.

Key considerations after experiencing a dog bite event includes:

• Medical care: Prioritize seeing a healthcare professional who may assess the extent of the injury and provide appropriate treatment.

• Reporting: Work with local animal control agencies to report the incident; this records necessary details aiding completion of a robust case profile.

• Evidence collection: Documenting any video footage, photos of injuries or witness statements can prove extremely crucial during lawsuit proceedings.

• Legal consultation: It would be advisable to promptly seek legal guidance; doing so assures that your interests will remain safeguarded throughout the process.

As dedicated personal injury lawyers based in Illinois, Carlson Bier has successfully handled numerous cases involving dog bite injuries over several decades. Our extensive experience allows us insight into understanding the unique aspects inherent within each situation – factors such as reconstructive surgery requirements due to disfigurement caused by aggressive breeds or psychological repercussions faced by child victims.

It’s essential you comprehend your lawful right in holding negligent pet owners accountable for any harm inflicted upon you; a dog owner’s failure to restrain their animal, particularly if the pet had previously displayed aggressive behavior equates to negligence. A component of Illinois law known as the “strict liability” clause applies in such situations and might significantly increase your chances for procuring deserving recompense.

Though complex, understanding dog bite laws can be simplified under astute legal counsel. In Illinois, statutes dictate that victims need only prove they were indeed bitten (or likewise injured), were within legally permissible premises during the incident occurrence and did not provoke the said animal into attacking them. Nowadays, any assumption claiming certain breeds are inherently dangerous and thus more liable is viewed as outdated – all dogs are subject to these same standards as per local legislation.

Our intent at Carlson Bier Associates is simply this – provide our clients with knowledgeable guidance and steadfast representation while navigating through intricate legal landscapes surrounding dog bite injuries. We work closely with medical professionals ensuring comprehensive care starting from physical wound healing through psychological trauma management should that become necessary. Our dedication towards our clients’ best interests combined with relentless pursuit of justice ensures maximum compensation recovery feasible under prevailing circumstances.

Facing an unanticipated ordeal such as a dog bite injury causes enough stress without wrestling against Insurance agencies fixed on minimizing payouts or pet owners unwilling to admit fault. Instead, by choosing us to represent your case brings assurance of expert proficiency dealing specifically with personal injury litigations including those involving pets.

In conclusion, your life matters profoundly; don’t let recklessness-filled moments perpetuated by others irreparably mar it without just compensation being factored in. If you’ve been a victim of a dog-bite incident and wish to understand what benefits maybe rightfully yours – click on the button below now! Let Carlson Bier Associates help determine exactly what your claim could be worth in alignment with Illinois state stipulations concerning personal injury layovers related to pet aggressions.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Tuscola Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Tuscola

Areas of Practice in Tuscola

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Specializing in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Giving expert legal support for people of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Healthcare Misconduct

Delivering dedicated legal support for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Fault

Handling cases involving dangerous products, extending skilled legal assistance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Neglect

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble & Trip Accidents

Specialist in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking compensation for their losses.

Infant Harms

Extending legal aid for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Accidents: Devoted to helping victims of car accidents obtain reasonable payout for harms and losses.

Scooter Mishaps

Focused on providing representation for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Trucking Incident

Providing specialist legal advice for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for losses.

Construction Crashes

Focused on representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Traumas

Specializing in extending dedicated legal services for victims suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Skilled in managing cases for persons who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Collisions

Specializing in legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unfair Loss

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and skilled legal services to ensure redress.

Spine Damage

Dedicated to defending patients with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​