Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Tuscola

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a spinal cord injury, securing reliable and experienced legal help is vital. For residents in Tuscola, the law firm of Carlson Bier remains an optimal choice. They specialize in cases surrounding Spinal Cord Injuries and bring forth their vast resource pool and knowledge base to get desirable results for their clients.

Navigating through complex medical terminologies, hefty paperwork, insurance claims can be overwhelming after such an untoward incident. With respected credentials behind them, Carlson Bier attorneys ensure these tedious tasks don’t add onto your stress.

At our law firm, we maintain rigorous standards while providing compassionate legal service that one deserves during this crucial time. Focusing not just on achieving substantial settlements but also advocating for comprehensive rehabilitation support best exhibits our client-centered approach.

With a robust record of countless successful negotiations under our belt and by marching hand-in-hand throughout the entire process with you – from collecting evidence to representing you flawlessly in court – we endeavor to turn things around positively.

For top-notch representation nestled alongside unwavering support during an arduous journey recovering from a challenging ordeal like Spinal Cord Injury – look no further than Carlson Bier!

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Tuscola Illinois

Navigating the complex and often overwhelming world of personal injury law can be a daunting endeavor. At Carlson Bier, we understand the intricacies this specialization demands, particularly those surrounding spinal cord injuries; one of the most serious types of personal injury cases. Specializing in Illinois-specific legislation, our objective is to lend our legal expertise to Tuscany residents grappling with these life-altering occurrences.

Spinal cord injuries are amongst the most severe injuries an individual can endure. The aftermath can leave victims disabled for life, necessitating round-the-clock care while introducing a host of financial concerns relating to medical and lifelong treatment costs. When such tragedy strikes as a result of another person’s negligent or reckless behavior, you don’t have to bear the burden alone – Carlson Bier holds perpetrators legally responsible whilst seeking full compensation on your behalf.

The path towards recovery where spinal cord injuries are concerned involves understanding several key points:

• Severely Fractured Vertebrae: A fracture can lead to bone fragments becoming lodged in soft tissues or piercing adjacent organs and blood vessels.

• Spinal Cord Compression: This occurs when pressure is exerted upon any part of your spinal cord – causing nerve damage which results in pain and loss of function within certain body parts.

• Disc Degeneration/Deterioration: Ageing makes discs more susceptible to injury, potentially leading to severe back pain or nerve compression if herniated.

• Full Transection/Paraplegia/Quadriplegia: Situations wherein complete severance has occurred usually culminate in permanent paralysis below the area affected due largely to cut-off communication between the brain and other parts.

These aforementioned conditions define some facets of spinal cord injuries that may constitute grounds for litigation but each case’s merits must first undergo careful evaluation before proceeding. Balancing out potential timeframes pitch against probabilities regarding payout amounts remains central throughout all processes drafted by us at Carlson Bier – promoting equitable outcomes being our foundational mantra.

Dealing with the ramifications of a severe injury can be overwhelming, but armed with the right legal representation, you’re never alone. Knowing your rights and understanding compensation measures are essential steps towards restitution.

Noticeably absent from this gamut is falsehood – while we strive to make justice for our clients prevail, Carlson Bier does not foster illusions about instantaneous success. We believe in managing expectations realistically – recognising that each case requires time, patience and dedication to seek maximum compensation under Illinois law.

We couple this approach with continuous updates regarding each legal development – ensuring you remain informed throughout all proceedings for as long as they last. Our personal injury attorney takes pride in being thoroughly transparent and providing tailored solutions according to case specifications.

Illinois law mandates certain restrictions concerning advertisement which Carlson Bier strictly adheres to: While implying physical presence within localities where no actual office exists breaches expected protocols, our services aren’t necessarily restricted by geography. With technology enabling us at the forefront today; connecting adversely affected victims to competent remedial resources forms the backbone of every effort made by us.

When it comes to fighting for those who have sustained spinal cord injuries due to someone else’s negligence or recklessness, you can trust the professional team at Carlson Bier to invest devoted attention into establishing a solid claim and compete rigorously on your behalf.

As one final reminder: As daunting as these prospects may seem now, remember that guidance from an experienced personal injury lawyer could dramatically impact your life’s trajectory following such catastrophic events..and alter potential outcomes positively than previously imagined.

Interested in estimating how much your case might be worth? Click on the button below. Speak directly with one of our experienced attorneys who will guide you through the process step-by-step…and most importantly align strategies best suited toward obtaining optimum financial recoveries wherever possible under Illinois law.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Tuscola Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Tuscola

Areas of Practice in Tuscola

Cycling Incidents

Specializing in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Providing adept legal assistance for people of severe burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Hospital Negligence

Providing specialist legal representation for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Accountability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, providing adept legal assistance to victims affected by defective items.

Aged Malpractice

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Trip Occurrences

Skilled in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking recovery for their losses.

Childbirth Damages

Extending legal guidance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Mishaps: Dedicated to supporting patients of car accidents gain reasonable payout for damages and impairment.

Motorbike Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Semi Incident

Extending professional legal support for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for injuries.

Building Site Mishaps

Dedicated to defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Cerebral Injuries

Committed to ensuring compassionate legal services for patients suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Injuries

Skilled in tackling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Loss

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and professional legal support to ensure justice.

Neural Injury

Committed to supporting patients with paralysis, offering specialized legal guidance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer