Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Uptown

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you are in the unfortunate situation of suffering a dog bite injury, it is crucial to have strong representation on your side. This is where Carlson Bier comes in. Operating as a top-notch personal injury law firm, we specialize particularly in cases involving dog bite injuries and carry years of combined experience within our team. We understand how traumatic these situations can be and work relentlessly to ensure justice for our clients through favorable compensations. Although each case varies considerably, we implement tailored approaches that match your unique circumstances while consistently adhering to Illinois laws concerning such incidents. By choosing us as your legal support, assure yourself an astute understanding of this niche area alongside an unfaltered commitment towards results-oriented advocacy – crucial factors for positive outcomes Consumer protection doesn’t stop on county borders; hence Carlson Bier takes pride in broadly extending expert guidance even beyond its base location – aiming toward those residing or injured across the state including Uptown… at Carlson Bier agility follows uncompromising integrity!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Uptown Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the distress and confusion that can follow a dog bite injury. With established expertise in this field of personal injury law as our backbone, we strive to provide you with comprehensive support through these challenging times. Based in Illinois, our highly knowledgeable lawyers specialize in handling dog bite cases, helping victims understand their rights and seek just compensation.

A significant component of this critical process begins with understanding Illinois’s Dog Liability Statute. This state-specific legislation makes a pet owner liable for an unprovoked attack by their animal on another individual who is conducting themselves peacefully within all legal restrictions. Moreover, based on the principle of strict liability applied in Illinois, it doesn’t matter if the owner knew or had reason to believe that their dog could be potentially dangerous.

Furthermore, recognizing crucial facts about Dog Bite Injuries greatly aids your case:

• Victim does not need to prove any neglectfulness on part of pet-owner

• A claim needs to justify that victim wasn’t trespassing or provoking

• Simply displaying wound isn’t enough; it’s equally important how you emotionally felt

Our years-long experience informs us there are multifaceted layers to these circumstances which go beyond initial treatment costs. Often grotesque injuries lead to psychological scars alongside physical ones— leading to full life disruption from work absences and severe emotional stress affecting family relationships. At Carlson Bier, our expert attorneys conduct thorough assessments of clients’ experiences post-incident taking all factors into account while claiming compensation.

The medical attention required following dog bites varies significantly depending upon severity and temperament — spanning from tetanus shots for minor wounds up until extensive surgeries for deep lacerations complications like disfigurement or infections aren’t ruled out either — adding mounting hospital bills/medical expenses that were otherwise unplanned adding economic strain onto already traumatized victims

Given these insights about dog bites under Illinois law and potential implications on your routine life due to such an incident underscored the importance of legal assistance from experienced personal injury attorneys. Our doorstep approach ensures you get timely advice in your moment of need maintaining utmost discretion about your case details– working relentlessly until justice is served.

We believe that education empowers individuals, and it is our goal to help you in navigating these complexities brought on by an unexpected dog bite incident. However, we understand that every situation is unique. The law’s interpretation might differ based upon individual perspectives, requiring tailor-made strategies for each case depending upon tactical fact-presentation— this is where expertise matters most; our proficient team at Carlson Bier excels here.

Failing to take immediate action could be detrimental for your claim as under Illinois law Dog Bite claims have a basic statutory limitation period wherein plaintiffs can file lawsuits against dog owners within two years from the date of incident —Delay beyond could mean losing out on rightful compensation despite having concrete evidence

This content has been put together with greatest care all designed to demystify key facets around Dog Bite injuries providing clarity and equipped knowledge thereby aiding your decision-making journey towards seeking rightful reparation. By shining light on other hidden areas like negotiating with insurance companies who are known for their tactics minimizing repayment amount –we cover extensive grounds so you don’t have to fight alone through this tumultuous situation.

As dedicated advocates for victims of dog bites, at Carlson Bier we promise unwavering support until justice prevails. We are ready to assist you through each daunting step ahead, ensuring best possible outcome matching or exceeding expectations — because when it comes down to it everyone deserves a safe community.

Therefore if you or someone close has recently encountered a dog bite episode; time’s ticking – Act swiftly – Seek immediate medical attention followed by professional legal aide – Start Your Claim Process today! Remember combination of holy trinity : Quick Medical Aid + Timely Legal Advice + Prudent Actions could transform odds in favor

Hover below find out what your Case Worth could be with us. Act now, equip yourself and strive for a fair resolution alongside Carlson Bier, your trusted partners in this pursuit of rightful compensation.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Uptown Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Uptown

Areas of Practice in Uptown

Cycling Incidents

Focused on legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or hazardous conditions.

Flame Burns

Extending adept legal assistance for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Delivering experienced legal assistance for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Accountability

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, delivering specialist legal assistance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Misconduct

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Trip Injuries

Specialist in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking compensation for their damages.

Infant Wounds

Delivering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Accidents

Mishaps: Focused on assisting clients of car accidents obtain reasonable remuneration for wounds and impairment.

Motorbike Incidents

Expert in providing legal assistance for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Trucking Collision

Providing experienced legal assistance for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for losses.

Building Crashes

Engaged in supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Brain Impairments

Focused on ensuring compassionate legal advice for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Wounds

Expertise in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered harms from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Committed to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unjust Fatality

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and skilled legal services to ensure fairness.

Backbone Harm

Expert in supporting individuals with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer