FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Uptown

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a pedestrian accident, navigating through legal processes can be overwhelming. This is where Carlson Bier steps in as your trusted personal injury lawyer. Recognized for our robust proficiency in pedestrian accident law and commitment towards upholding the rights of victims, we make every effort to secure maximum compensation on your behalf. Our expertise goes beyond just understanding laws; it includes employing a strategic approach that aligns with Illinois-specific regulations and reflects an appreciation for individual circumstances each case presents. We’re proud to extend our professional services to residents of Uptown – ensuring you are not alone while dealing with litigation stress or negotiating insurance terms. By choosing Carlson Bier, you choose relentless advocacy coupled with compassionate support from beginning until resolution of your claim period We prioritize open communications, keeping clients informed through each stage cementing trust-based relationships together Let us leverage our skills and experienced judgment at work for the relief you deserve after enduring trauma from a pedestrian accident because at Carlson Bier, protecting victim’s rights isn’t only part of what we do – it’s all we do element

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Uptown Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are deeply committed to representing victims of pedestrian accidents throughout Illinois. Often a result of negligent behavior by motorists, these types of accidents can lead to severe injuries—even death—for the pedestrians involved. Our experienced personal injury attorneys are acutely aware that such incidents require aggressive legal advocacy to ensure justice is served and fair compensation is obtained for the sufferer and their families.

Pedestrian accidents come with unique circumstances compared to other types of personal injury cases. A few key points on this matter include:

– The rights which could be exercised immediately after an accident such as immediate medical attention regardless of insurance status.

– The complex nature behind determining liability—due regard needs to be observed pertaining to traffic rules, level of attentiveness from both parties involved, and vehicle speeds among others.

– The time-sensitive nature when handling claims with rigorous statute limitations in place strictly governing the timeline within which claims ought to be presented for consideration.

Our team at Carlson Bier holds extensive knowledge about all these factors pertaining to pedestrian accidents in Illinois and we apply this expertise assiduously when advocating your case.

When you entrust your case with us, our attorneys work diligently to establish compelling arguments substantiating driver negligence—the most typical cause behind pedestrian accidents. This includes identifying determinants like distracted driving, speeding or failure-to-yield while establishing your claim or lawsuit.

However, Pedestrian Accident Law isn’t just centered around motorist-induced situations alone but extends its scope into premises liability too. For instance, if inadequate lighting or poorly kept sidewalks contributed towards an unfortunate incident, relevant property owners could also be held accountable—a fact we keenly pursue when it works in favor of our clients’ claims.

Notably distinct from automobile collisions where your auto-insurance would seek resolution post-accident scenarios; experiencing a pedestrian accident leaves you entirely dependent on litigating any compensatory damages through the driver’s auto insurer. In instances where the driver might not have any insurance or if the policy limit proves inadequate to cover your expenses, our attorneys are skilled at exploring options for Underinsured/Uninsured Motorist Coverage from your own auto-insurance.

Lastly, it’s important to note that at Carlson Bier we attire ourselves for battle—not just quick settlements. We prepare every case as though it will go to trial. This precision in readiness not only strengthens your litigation but also oftentimes coerces insurance companies into offering fair compensatory amounts. Although suit-filing remains a last resort, with us by your side, you can rest assured knowing that should circumstances demand litigation—we are prepared to extend the fight towards acquiring justice in front of an audience.

The legal web tied around pedestrian accidents can be intricate and overwhelming—especially when you’re trying to navigate it while reeling from post-accident trauma. Allow us to help alleviate some of the stress involved in such dire times.

At Carlson Bier, we dedicate our professional efforts towards fostering a brighter future for pedestrian accident victims. Follow the link below now and take an important step toward restoring peace and order once more in your life – find out how much your case is worth and begin on this journey towards receiving comprehensive compensation together with us.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Uptown Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Uptown

Areas of Practice in Uptown

Bicycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Flame Burns

Supplying adept legal advice for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Medical Incompetence

Extending specialist legal assistance for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Accountability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, supplying specialist legal services to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Senior Malpractice

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Slip Incidents

Specialist in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking redress for their suffering.

Birth Damages

Delivering legal assistance for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Incidents: Concentrated on assisting individuals of car accidents secure fair remuneration for damages and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal advice for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Semi Mishap

Delivering professional legal assistance for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for losses.

Building Crashes

Committed to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Head Damages

Dedicated to extending specialized legal services for victims suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Proficient in handling cases for individuals who have suffered damages from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Expert in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Loss

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and expert legal support to ensure fairness.

Backbone Impairment

Expert in advocating for individuals with spine impairments, offering expert legal services to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​