Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Uptown

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the legal complexities surrounding spinal cord injuries demands specialized expertise and a profound understanding of Illinois law. At Carlson Bier, our seasoned attorneys utilize their extensive knowledge to advocate relentlessly for clients with such afflictions. We’re intimately aware that catastrophic accidents leading to these injuries can drastically alter lives – physically, emotionally, and financially; hence, we strive tirelessly to secure maximum compensation for our valuable clients. Our team is professional yet compassionate; they guide you through every step of your legal journey while responding honestly and promptly to any questions or concerns. A significant aspect that sets apart Carlson Bier in this scope is an enviable track record in succesfully handling spinal cord injury cases endorsed by numerous satisfied clients. Selecting us gives you access not only to a committed partner standing by your side during tough times but also unwavering assurance capable of delivering favorable results on spinal cord injury lawsuits under Illinois jurisdiction irrespective of where you reside within the state boundaries – even Uptown!

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Uptown Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we have the primary objective to provide our community with valuable information about personal injuries and advocate ardently in defending the rights of those affected. Among various types of personal harm one can endure, Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) hold significant gravity because of their severe impact on an individual’s everyday life. An injury of this kind might result from an automobile accident, a falter at work, or other miscellaneous misadventures that inflict unintended harm.

To begin with, it is critical to understand what spinal cord injuries are typically encompassing. These primarily relate to any damage inflicted on the spinal cord that creates temporary or permanent alterations in its function. The consequences range from sensory changes like numbness or tingling to motor disruptions including weakness or paralysis. Now let us delve into some key aspects:

• Severity: Generally categorized as ‘complete’ and ‘incomplete’, SCIs gravely vary in how they affect individuals.

• Complete SCI: Accounting for approximately half all cases according to National Institute Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), these lead to total loss control over sensory and motor function below level injury.

• Incomplete SCI: As name suggests, these preserve some degree functioning below level injury; nonetheless, effects fluctuate widely across different individuals.

What further exacerbates the complex situation around SCIs are the lofty medical costs attached to treatment options necessary for recovery. These range from emergency care required right after the incident to long term rehabilitative procedures that are key for regaining maximum possible movement capabilities.

Carlson Bier understands this reality poignantly and vehemently works toward getting you comprehensively compensated ensuring your medical expenses do not weigh heavily upon your shoulders during your recovery phase. Our experienced lawyers scrutinize your case in detail while always keeping open channels of communication for any queries you might harbor regarding your claim status.

A crucial point addressed often is determining liability – correctly identifying who exactly was at fault for your accident that inevitably resulted in spinal cord injury. Relying on the specific details of each case, it could be anything from a company’s negligence at the workplace to an individual driver’s errant conduct on road. Rest assured; our seasoned legal professionals meticulously evaluate every aspect to safeguard your interests utmostly.

Results lead us! But we still maintain that no two cases are similar – especially when dealing with intricate cases related to SCI. The factors and circumstances surrounding each particular incident can vary widely, and therefore, the corresponding compensation packages differ as well.

For this reason, providing educational content about SCIs is part of our committed-duties – empowering you to understand better what you’ve experienced and how Carlson Bier team supports your fight against justice.

Our attorneys don’t merely handle matters happening within courtroom walls but extend beyond by offering full attention towards acquiring all relevant details necessary for preparing a robust claim for anyone enduring pain/suffering due to SCI in Illinois.

Once again, we’d like emphasize not equating this informational expanse offered here as any form professional medical advice instead treat it baseline stepping stone reach out more concrete help and solutions provided by experts both legal medical fields respectively when dealing unfortunate instances such as spinal cord injuries.

As time plays instrumental role recovery process individuals suffering from SCIs strongly encourage taking immediate action secure rights potentially seek settlement your predicament deservingly worth sooner better picture becomes seeking recompense availing best available treatment concurrently reduces psychological stress importantly brings balance back disrupted life adversely affected unfortunate events.

This is where we step forward fervently: We invite you discover much case truly deserves simply clicking button below bringing forth sense clarity amidst storm uncertainty precise knowledgeable stance fills shadows doubt clear light understanding rightful entitlements momentous journey toward TCFields wholly new affirmative chapter life Carlson Bier alongside valiantly courageous relentless inevitable fight justice recognition unfairly stripped away dignity compassionately restored nothing but sheer grit determination- Welcome aboard!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Uptown Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Uptown

Areas of Practice in Uptown

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Focused on legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving professional legal support for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing professional legal representation for clients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Fault

Handling cases involving dangerous products, providing specialist legal help to victims affected by faulty goods.

Aged Abuse

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Stumble Accidents

Skilled in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking recovery for their damages.

Newborn Injuries

Providing legal aid for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Crashes: Devoted to guiding sufferers of car accidents secure appropriate remuneration for damages and destruction.

Scooter Mishaps

Focused on providing legal advice for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Big Rig Accident

Delivering adept legal representation for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for hurts.

Building Mishaps

Concentrated on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cognitive Damages

Expert in offering specialized legal advice for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Damages

Specialized in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unfair Passing

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and skilled legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Backbone Impairment

Focused on defending victims with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer