FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Urbana

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the unfortunate event of a pedestrian accident, obtaining legal representation is paramount. Carlson Bier emerges as an exemplary choice for those seeking formidable advocacy within Urbana. With their mastery in managing unique angles related to pedestrian accidents, they have demonstrated a commitment to champion the rights and interests of pedestrians who have been injured through no fault of their own. What sets them apart? Their dedication goes beyond standard professional service; it mirrors tireless advocacy that tenaciously pursues rightful compensation for clients’ physical, emotional traumas and financial woes post-accident. They draw from decades-long experience navigating this often complex realm of personal injury law, employing strategic argumentation and negotiation tactics geared towards achieving optimal outcomes. Furthermore, Carlson Bier ensures personalized attention detailing your case comprehensively – this way you never feel merely like ‘another number’. Choosing Carlson Bier means choosing victory over injustice for any pedestrian accident incident within Urbana’s vicinity – making an excellent choice clear: security is found in expertise.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Urbana Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are personal injury attorneys based in Illinois who specialize in Pedestrian Accident cases. What sets us apart is not just our deep expertise and broad experience but also our commitment to bringing value and hands-on support to every case we handle.

According to research from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), a pedestrian is killed approximately every Two hours across America due to accidents. More often than not, victims of pedestrian accidents suffer severe injuries that can have life-altering consequences. These instances demand legal practitioners equipped with an understanding of the complexities around Pedestrian Accidents, and at Carlson Bier, that’s exactly what we offer.

The primary focus point on which pedestrian accident lawsuits hinge is proving negligence; essentially showing that the other party failed to exercise due caution while operating their vehicle.

• This could include speeding: Drivers who speed have less time to react if a pedestrian suddenly enters their path.

• It could also entail disobedient behavior towards traffic signals or signs: A driver who decides to leap ahead before the light turns green can suddenly collide with a pedestrians crossing.

• And intoxicated driving: Driving under influence naturally impairs one’s ability. In these varying scenarios highlighting negligence proves key.

When dealing with such cases, our proceeding involves comprehensive investigation where collecting necessary evidence becomes pivotal – it could involve speaking with eyewitnesses or analyzing surveillance videos when available. At times we undertake services of professional investigators for gathering all relevant information crucial for building your case strongly.

Our next step involves quantifying damages – listing out your medical expenses, lost wages due to inability to work, property damage if any – along with assessing non-economic losses like emotional distress or loss of companionship etc.

Beyond establishing negligence on part of the responsible party and documenting damages sustained by you as because thereof comes the perilous negotiation process – this entails negotiating aggressively yet prudently with insurance companies involved all aimed towards securing you maximum possible compensation. It’s no secret that insurance companies aren’t inclined to pay out easily, yet having our experienced negotiating attorneys by your side gives you a confident upper hand.

Client assistance and support remain at our service-core beyond just developing effective legal strategies. This includes dealing with collision aftermath like helping you get vehicle repairs done or helping arrange medical appointments- especially crucial if injuries suffer are debilitating. Associated threads which may seem confusing, we untangle diligently providing you all-inclusive solution-focused services.

Our approach remains rooted in empathy; walking alongside you in this trialing journey ensuring you receive rightful justice. Every case is different and we tailor our methodologies suiting it best; letting nothing stand between your deserving compensation recoveries.

At Carlson Bier, under the folds of Pedestrian Accident cases, we have seen varied scenarios unfold: poorly maintained sidewalks causing accidents, pedestrians hit crossing outside crosswalks lawyers who ended up blaming victims for their injuries – We’ve seen it all! Hence rest assured as you put forth your trust in us, bracing for such hurdles becomes inherently part of how we proceed hence speeding up realization of rightful recovery.

Potential clients often worry about seeking legal help due to their preconceived notions about fees structure; let us tell them – You pay Only When WE Win! Our transparent fee system implies payment only upon settlement receipt or winning verdict.

Having highlighted key elements around Pedestrian Accidents and underlining how personal injury attorneys here at Carlson Bier engage with such cases towards driving optimum client advantage – there’s much more Carlson Bier can offer than what fits within this write-up’s boundaries!

Your situation could be unique necessitating specific guidance or perhaps rendering additional queries bubbling on surface. Now here’s some good news – click on the button below and find out what your case is really worth! Benefit from our free consultation where we map out specifics surrounding your unique case-circumstances –let’s understand better what you have at stake and discuss to address that with a plan!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Urbana Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Urbana

Areas of Practice in Urbana

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Proficient in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving skilled legal help for victims of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Providing specialist legal services for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Fault

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, supplying specialist legal help to victims affected by faulty goods.

Elder Misconduct

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Stumble Occurrences

Skilled in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking recovery for their harm.

Infant Harms

Providing legal aid for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Incidents: Dedicated to aiding victims of car accidents obtain equitable compensation for harms and losses.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Committed to providing legal support for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Crash

Offering specialist legal advice for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for injuries.

Worksite Incidents

Focused on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Brain Harms

Committed to providing compassionate legal representation for individuals suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Damages

Proficient in handling cases for persons who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Fatality

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and expert legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Neural Trauma

Focused on advocating for victims with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​