...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in Ursa

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In navigating the aftermath of bicycle accidents, peace of mind comes with professional legal representation. Carlson Bier excels in this niche, dutifully serving those who have experienced such occurrences. Our vast experience and dedication to justice make us an excellent choice for residents across Illinois seeking robust legal representation for bicycle accident cases. As a personal injury law firm, we stand out due to our relentless pursuit of fair compensation for our clients’ injuries or damages. Ensuring that avenues typically unexplored by non-specialist attorneys are comprehensively analyzed forms the bedrock of our success story as Bicycle Accidents lawyers.

We empathize deeply with your situation – no one should endure alone what follows from a devastating incident such as a cycling mishap; count on Carlson Bier’s no-nonsense approach towards securing justice in adaptably representing your unique circumstances within the context of Illinois’ multifaceted personal injury laws.

Opting for excellence means choosing Carlson Bier – reliable partners in troubling times; trust us to guide you securely through complex processes and ease your burden considerably when grappling with post-accident realities.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Ursa Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to serving individuals who have been impacted by accidents and injuries of various types. One such niche of personal injury law that we specialize in is bicycle accidents. Illinois has its fair share of bicyclists, and unfortunately, also experiences a high incidence of bike-related accidents leading to severe personal injuries or even loss of life.

As experts in this legal field, we understand the variety of factors that may lead to these incidents. Most commonly it involves collisions with motor vehicles due to disregard of traffic rules or engagement in distracted driving behaviors. Sometimes road conditions or construction work may cause unexpected obstacles for cyclists, leading to serious accidents as well. In all instances, the potential for physical harm can be significant and the need for specialist legal representation becomes paramount.

When pursuing a claim following a bicycle accident it’s key to examine several aspects:

• Evidence collection: This includes photographs from the scene, witness testimonials and police records.

• Causation analysis: Understanding exactly why the accident happened is crucial when asserting liability.

• Medical evaluation: Medical reports help outline severity of injuries whilst projecting future medical needs

• Damages calculation: We compile an exhaustive list of applicable damages such as lost wages, rehabilitation costs etc.

Navigating through these complexities requires meticulous attention-to-detail along with substantial insights into Illinois’ laws pertaining to bicycle accidents; characteristics that define us at Carlson Bier.

Looking ahead post-accident can be devastating but rest assured realizing your full entitlements under the law can significantly alleviate financial stressors encountered during recovery. Our involvement not only constitutes providing robust representation throughout litigation proceedings but also shoulders administrative burdens on your behalf letting you focus entirely on healing & rehabilitating.

It’s worthwhile mentioning here – there’s no up-front cost when partnering with us because fees are contingent upon successful resolution meaning our interests remain inherently aligned towards securing maximum possible compensation for you.

Another noteworthy aspect regarding our services is our expansive reach. While we are not physically based in Ursa, restrictions set by state law do not limit us from representing clients elsewhere within Illinois – so whether you reside in a large urban center or more rural surroundings, our dedication towards championing your rights remains undeterred.

Carlson Bier boasts strong relationships with some of the foremost accident reconstruction experts in Illinois which allows presentation of the most compelling arguments when asserting liability against defendants. Our core focus revolves around securing justice for victims of negligent road behavior helping reduce profound life changes an accident can bring about through comprehensive compensation.

Where bike-related accidents are concerned, potential injuries extend far beyond physical harm – they profoundly impact emotional wellbeing whilst causing significant toll on personal lifestyles and future prospects following recovery. Validating these intangible attributes demands considerable professional expertise which Carlson Bier unequivocally brings to table for every single client.

In conclusion, if you’re grappling with aftermath of such unfortunate incident – let’s join hands! We promise unwavering support throughout this demanding interrogation. Let us guide through the maze that litigation undoubtedly is; ensure your voice gets heard loud & clear enabling financial liberation from sustained damages ensuring optimal recovery facilitated. Every case holds unique elements thus requires personalized perspective no matter how straightforward appearing initially.

So why wait? Our preliminary consultation awaits at click below – providing invaluable insight into what prospective claim might ideally yield thereby setting foundation for victorious arises after devastating fall off your ride!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Ursa Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Ursa

Areas of Practice in Ursa

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Supplying specialist legal assistance for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Medical Carelessness

Delivering expert legal advice for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, extending skilled legal support to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Slip Injuries

Expert in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking restitution for their losses.

Newborn Harms

Providing legal guidance for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Crashes

Incidents: Devoted to helping individuals of car accidents obtain equitable recompense for hurts and impairment.

Motorbike Mishaps

Dedicated to providing representation for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

18-Wheeler Incident

Offering experienced legal representation for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for losses.

Worksite Crashes

Concentrated on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Brain Injuries

Expert in providing specialized legal assistance for victims suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Wounds

Skilled in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Expert in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unfair Fatality

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and experienced legal assistance to ensure redress.

Vertebral Impairment

Dedicated to supporting persons with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​