...

Car Accident Attorney in Ursa

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you have been involved in a car accident in Ursa, it’s crucial to seek credible legal guidance. Carlson Bier is your optimal choice for professional and experienced representation. Our primary commitment is to uphold your rights and help you attain the appropriate compensation deserved after an auto collision. We pride ourselves on understanding how physically, emotionally, and financially straining such incidents can be and vow to go the extra mile for our clients ensuring active communication throughout each step of this quite complicated process. Our team at Carlson Bier has a commanding track record that speaks volumes about our resolve towards attaining rightful justice for car accident victims with vigorous advocacy fortified by strategic negotiation skills before insurers or jury if necessary.We take all cases whether big or small ensuring everyone gets their fair shake of justice.Think expert advice, think maximum settlement – think Carlson Bier– because we believe no one should carry the burden of someone else’s negligence alone.Call us today!

About Carlson Bier

Car Accident Lawyers in Ursa Illinois

Personal injury accidents can have serious consequences that last long after the incident occurs. At Carlson Bier, we understand the toll such incidents can take and are committed to providing comprehensive legal counsel to those who need it most. Our skilled team focuses predominantly on car accident cases across Illinois, using our extensive legal knowledge to support your case.

Car accidents happen daily and are often a primary reason for personal injury claims. The repercussions can encompass physical injuries, emotional trauma, financial strain due to medical bills, property damage repair costs and lost earning potential for prolonged periods. Every situation is unique; however, victims usually encounter several common hurdles during their recovery.

Certain key aspects should be paramount when dealing with the aftermath of an accident:

• Identifying liable parties: In many car accidents, multiple parties may bear some responsibility for the incident. Determining this liability accurately has substantial implications on your claim’s success.

• Understanding Insurance Claims: Navigating insurance claims post-accident can be confusing and overwhelming. Without prior comprehension or legal representation, you risk receiving less than what you deserve based on your policies.

• Pursuing Compensation: All damages—physical & emotional wounds, financial burdens—stemming from the accident warrant reasonable compensation from responsible parties or their insurance providers.

Carlson Bier assists clients in overcoming these challenges effectively by conducting thorough investigations into each case’s specifics while framing robust arguments that uphold their rights in court proceedings.

Being involved in a car accident is challenging enough without considering the complications of ensuing lawsuits or insurance battles. When such instances arise, having qualified attorneys like ours at Carlson Bier is critical in ensuring equitable reparation measures for possible losses incurred because some damages might not be immediately apparent after an accident but may become evident later.

For example:

– You could suffer a traumatic brain injury or spinal cord damage that requires months of therapy or surgery.

– Emotional anguish caused by an accident fades slowly and therapy costs could mount up over a stretch.

– Lost earnings, if you can’t return to work immediately or ever again owing to the accident.

Our expertise ranges from minor fender-benders and multi-car accidents to fatal car crashes. Regardless of your situation, our aim is consistent – helping you recover medical expenses, lost wages and compensation for pain & suffering that you may be entitled to.

The legally convoluted nature of personal injury cases demands an informed approach. Consequently, our strategies are driven by precedent-setting court decisions and the latest revisions in Illinois motor vehicle accident laws.

Drawing on these principles, Carlson Bier charters assertive roadmaps to protecting your interests throughout legal proceedings while advocating persistently for settlements commensurate with deserved damages. And curating impactful narratives around them enhances potential prospects for success during negotiations or trials.

Experiencing a car accident can put victims under unexpected stress due to injuries or financial burdens resulting from repair costs and medical expenses. The last thing they need is additional anxiety about representing themselves adequately against insurance companies bent on paying out as little as possible.

Take action today and protect yourself against such unnecessary pressures. You deserve fair representation in seeking the justice owed due to someone else’s negligence. To ascertain whether Carlson Bier’s proven track record aligns best with your particular needs in these challenging circumstances – simply click the button below.

Evaluate how much your case is worth without any upfront costs; only remuneration required is resulting from successful resolution of your claim favoring you—the cardinal principle governing all Carlson Bier engagements—a testament truly delineating our commitment towards assisting personal injury victims across Illinois seek redressal rightfully theirs!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Ursa Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Car Accident FAQ​

The most common causes of car accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause drivers to lose control of their vehicles.
  • Vehicle defects: Defective vehicles can cause accidents in a variety of ways.
  • Weather conditions: Rain, snow, and ice can make roads slick and dangerous.

If you are involved in a car accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

    Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle.

    Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Ursa

Areas of Practice in Ursa

Bicycle Incidents

Expert in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Extending professional legal support for people of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Healthcare Negligence

Offering experienced legal advice for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Accountability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, supplying expert legal guidance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Elder Neglect

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Trip Accidents

Expert in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking recovery for their injuries.

Newborn Traumas

Supplying legal aid for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Accidents: Dedicated to helping victims of car accidents get fair compensation for wounds and impairment.

Motorcycle Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Trucking Incident

Delivering adept legal advice for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for losses.

Construction Site Incidents

Engaged in defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Head Impairments

Focused on extending expert legal representation for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Injuries

Specialized in addressing cases for clients who have suffered damages from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Incidents

Focused on legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Passing

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and professional legal representation to ensure justice.

Vertebral Harm

Committed to defending patients with vertebral damage, offering expert legal support to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer